On 30-Nov-2004, "rick etter" wrote:

I don't remember
saying that, eh?

Go back through the thread. You jumped in when I responded to
such a statement.

Mike

"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 30-Nov-2004, "rick etter" wrote:

I don't remember
saying that, eh?

Go back through the thread. You jumped in when I responded to
such a statement.
================
and I made the statement?

But, I notice you dishonestly snipped out the rest of the post that you
apparently found too hard to reply to, eh?



Mike

On 1-Dec-2004, "rick etter" wrote:

and I made the statement?

No, but I'm discussing the topic of the thread, not your
vitriol.

But, I notice you dishonestly snipped out the rest of the post that you
apparently found too hard to reply to, eh?

I'm still waiting for you, Tom and Larry to respond to lots of stuff
I posted but you guys didn't bother to address. Works both ways chum.

Cheers,
Mike

"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 1-Dec-2004, "rick etter" wrote:

and I made the statement?

No, but I'm discussing the topic of the thread, not your
vitriol.

But, I notice you dishonestly snipped out the rest of the post that you
apparently found too hard to reply to, eh?

I'm still waiting for you, Tom and Larry to respond to lots of stuff
I posted but you guys didn't bother to address. Works both ways chum.
===========================
Don't snip it out and maybe somebody would,,,, You get what you give,
fool.


Cheers,
Mike