Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 07:38:01 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: ~~ snippity snip ~~ You have lots of problems with nuance. Life while you're living it is conditional at best, with lots of "If-Thens." Well, at least it is if you are driven by intellect. If you are Pavlovian, then I suppose you don't have to concern yourself with nuance. I don't see it that way. In my world, everything is pretty much black and white. And I don't see that as Pavlovian as much as I see it as a rational look at how the world works. I think it comes from being a mathematician by education and a engineer by profession. Remember the French language wars of the early '70s? French good, English bad? Then they discovered that the France French they'd been speaking for the past 200 or so years isn't French at all but an amalgation of Basque, Spanish and English leading to purifying the language by, and I loved this bit, sending French teachers to rural Louisiana to learn "true" French. Now that's pretty black and white in terms of culture isn't it? :) Anything that "defiles" the language is purged in favor of non-inclusion of terms from other languages and cultures. That's not nuance - that's pure simple arrogance and, if you wanted to use the term, bigotry. I think way to much emphasis is placed on nuance as being an intellectual trait. Nuance certainly does have it's place in philosophy, psychiatry/psychology and other medical professions that are not based on pure science, but as a practical trait, a factor in daily decision making, it's counter productive. Later, Tom |