Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom wrote:
Since you obviously failed to convert enough voters to sway the election would you please give up your attempts and let's turn this back into a boating newsgroup? Harry sputtered indignantly: I've never been on the Democratic Party payroll. I have from time to time done some volunteer work for the party itself. I have been directly involved for compensation in the campaigns of several congressional candidates over the years and have been paid directly by them for services, but none of my checks came from the Democratic Party. This past election, I was involved in the creative end of a series of television and radio commercials on behalf of organizations with common political interests, but none was the DNC or any of its affiliates. Notice he never directly answered the question. Typical Demo tactic. I marched for peace, right along with the rest of the Division. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() -- "Mark" wrote in message ... Tom wrote: Since you obviously failed to convert enough voters to sway the election would you please give up your attempts and let's turn this back into a boating newsgroup? Harry sputtered indignantly: I've never been on the Democratic Party payroll. I have from time to time done some volunteer work for the party itself. I have been directly involved for compensation in the campaigns of several congressional candidates over the years and have been paid directly by them for services, but none of my checks came from the Democratic Party. This past election, I was involved in the creative end of a series of television and radio commercials on behalf of organizations with common political interests, but none was the DNC or any of its affiliates. Notice he never directly answered the question. C I marched for peace, right along with the rest of the Division. Notice he never directly answered the question? The question was "Harry - Now that Kerry has conceded and the election is over are you off the Democratic payroll? His answer was "I've never been on the Democratic Party payroll" Just exactly what "Typical Demo tactic" is it that confuses you? Dixon |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around 11/3/2004 2:26 PM, Mark wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: I've never been on the Democratic Party payroll. I have from time to time done some volunteer work for the party itself. I have been directly involved for compensation in the campaigns of several congressional candidates over the years and have been paid directly by them for services, but none of my checks came from the Democratic Party. This past election, I was involved in the creative end of a series of television and radio commercials on behalf of organizations with common political interests, but none was the DNC or any of its affiliates. Notice he never directly answered the question. Sure he did, you just snipped the question he answered: "Now that Kerry has conceded and the election is over are you off the Democratic payroll?" You can't get any more direct of an answer than "I've never been on the Democratic Party payroll." -- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Garth Almgren" wrote in message ... Sure he did, you just snipped the question he answered: "Now that Kerry has conceded and the election is over are you off the Democratic payroll?" You can't get any more direct of an answer than "I've never been on the Democratic Party payroll." -- Hee hee...a lot of Harry's antagonizes don't appear to be very bright. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"would you please give up your
attempts and let's turn this back into a boating newsgroup? Sure would be a nice change." I see a second question mark. And I'm not even as "bright" as a democrat:-) Don Hee hee...a lot of Harry's antagonizes don't appear to be very bright. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around 11/3/2004 4:38 PM, M-Tech wrote:
"would you please give up your attempts and let's turn this back into a boating newsgroup? Sure would be a nice change." I see a second question mark. After addressing the first in depth, he chose not to answer the second, which was a rather insulting question. I don't see any problem with that. What I *do* see a problem with is Mark trimming Tom's original post to make it appear that Harry hadn't addressed Tom's questions at all, and that's just dishonest. And I'm not even as "bright" as a democrat:-) Clearly. ![]() -- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() After addressing the first in depth, he chose not to answer the second, which was a rather insulting question. I don't see any problem with that. I don't see where the question was insulting. This newsgroup is supposed to be about boating and Harry (along with a few others) has been on a mission to convert it to his own little political newsgroup which has done nothing but generate hostility. I, for one, would prefer to see more boating related topics and move the political comments to an appropriate venue. Harry may be a likeable fellow, knowledgeable about boats and helpful to those with questions or problems but it would be hard to tell from his posts and even if he posts something worthwhile he will only get blasted by his protagonists. The election is over - we don't have to face it again for four more years so why not drop the political BS and talk about boats and fishing and cruising and sailing and whatever else might be related to boating? Who knows - we might find out we even like each other. :-) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
He said he didn't answer the "question". He did not say which one. Funny,
you chose to comment on the question he(harry) DID answer and not the one he didn't? And how is asking to return a ng to normal an "insulting question"??? Me thinks this guy might have you dems pegged pretty good....clearly:-) Don "Garth Almgren" wrote in message ... Around 11/3/2004 4:38 PM, M-Tech wrote: What I *do* see a problem with is Mark trimming Tom's original post to make it appear that Harry hadn't addressed Tom's questions at all, and that's just dishonest. And I'm not even as "bright" as a democrat:-) Clearly. ![]() -- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/4/2004 3:49 PM, M-Tech wrote:
Funny, you chose to comment on the question he(harry) DID answer and not the one he didn't? No, I commented on that one too, as you noted below. And how is asking to return a ng to normal an "insulting question"??? Read it again: "Since you obviously failed to convert enough voters to sway the election would you please give up your attempts and let's turn this back into a boating newsgroup?" As phrased, it was both insinuatory and misleading, therefore insulting; an obvious troll - not what this newsgroup needs to return to "normal." Me thinks this guy might have you dems pegged pretty good....clearly:-) Nope, he's off by a nautical mile. -- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don White" wrote in message ... "Garth Almgren" wrote in message ... Sure he did, you just snipped the question he answered: "Now that Kerry has conceded and the election is over are you off the Democratic payroll?" You can't get any more direct of an answer than "I've never been on the Democratic Party payroll." -- Hee hee...a lot of Harry's antagonizes don't appear to be very bright. Bright enough to relect President Bush. Bright enough to get Daschle voted out of office and increase the number of Republican seats in the Senate. Bright enough to increae the number of seats in the house. I also read that Canada doesn't want the loosers, Kerry supporters, thinking that they can just walk over the border and set up shop in Canada. It seems your health care system and social support system are at their breaking points. When y'all need a loan come and see us we always help those in need. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Accident Emergency Question [Three part ] | ASA | |||
Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! | ASA |