Tinkerntom wrote:
Of course I am not for pollution. This simplistic approach which
presents itself as exclusive and elite intellectualism is the reason
you lost. You apparently still don't get it as has been pointed out
many times in this thread already. Should we assume that because the
Liberals, lost, that all is lost regarding the environment. No, it is
just how the battle is going to be fought, and I hope that you do not
prove yourself ineffective again, for the environments sake!

It was just the logical approach of your Bush that I used,
so if you call that simplistic... I agree.
Or to use your words with other goals:
Of course I am not for terrorism. No, it is just how the battle is
going to be fought, and I hope that you do not prove yourself
ineffective again, for the worlds sake!
As it is now, the war against terrorism is inefficient an ineffective
causing many innocent deaths and making things worse instead
of better.
And with the existence of the concentration camp in Guantanamo Bay,
the state has become the enemy and is creating new seeds
for more terrorism in all the world.