Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bin Laden saw Moore's F-911 I see...... sigh
-W "It never occurred to us that the commander in chief of the American forces (Bush) would leave 50,000 citizens in the two towers to face those horrors alone at a time when they most needed him because he thought listening to a child discussing her goat and its ramming was more important than the planes and their ramming of the skyscrapers. This had given us three times the time needed to carry out the operations, thanks be to God... "Your security is not in the hands of (Democratic presidential candidate John) Kerry or Bush or al Qaeda. Your security is in your own hands and each state which does not harm our security will remain safe. -- Today George W. Bush made a very compelling and thoughtful argument for why he should not be reelected. In his own words, he told the American people that "...a political candidate who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts is not a person you want as your Commander-in-Chief." |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Clams Canino" wrote in message link.net... Bin Laden saw Moore's F-911 I see...... sigh There are terrorists, terrorist sympathizers, and Democrats. Lately, they all sound remarkably alike. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:58:01 -0400, NOYB wrote:
There are terrorists, terrorist sympathizers, and Democrats. Lately, they all sound remarkably alike. Just curious, after 9/11, did you think bin Laden would still be running loose three years later? I sure as hell didn't. I figured six months, a year at the outside, and he would be brought to justice. The most powerful country on this planet, and he is still rubbing our nose in it. I blame Bush for that, who the hell do you blame? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:58:01 -0400, NOYB wrote: There are terrorists, terrorist sympathizers, and Democrats. Lately, they all sound remarkably alike. Just curious, after 9/11, did you think bin Laden would still be running loose three years later? I sure as hell didn't. I figured six months, a year at the outside, and he would be brought to justice. The most powerful country on this planet, and he is still rubbing our nose in it. I blame Bush for that, who the hell do you blame? I blame the Pakistani people who are willing to overthrow Musharraf if he allows US troops into Northwestern Pakistan with the intent to permanently entomb bin Laden's ass in the cave he's hiding in. Pakistan is an Arabic nuclear power, but with a level-headed US-friendly guy in charge (at least "somewhat" in charge). There have been several attempts already on Musharraf's life...two of them coming when Pakistani forces pushed the furthest into Waziristan. Because of the nukes, our hands are tied...which is precisely why we must move the war on terror into Iran before they're a nuclear power. Do you think we would have invaded Afghanistan if the Taliban had nukes? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message ... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:58:01 -0400, NOYB wrote: There are terrorists, terrorist sympathizers, and Democrats. Lately, they all sound remarkably alike. Just curious, after 9/11, did you think bin Laden would still be running loose three years later? I sure as hell didn't. I figured six months, a year at the outside, and he would be brought to justice. The most powerful country on this planet, and he is still rubbing our nose in it. I blame Bush for that, who the hell do you blame? I blame the Pakistani people who are willing to overthrow Musharraf if he allows US troops into Northwestern Pakistan with the intent to permanently entomb bin Laden's ass in the cave he's hiding in. Pakistan is an Arabic nuclear power, but with a level-headed US-friendly guy in charge (at least "somewhat" in charge). There have been several attempts already on Musharraf's life...two of them coming when Pakistani forces pushed the furthest into Waziristan. Because of the nukes, our hands are tied...which is precisely why we must move the war on terror into Iran before they're a nuclear power. Do you think we would have invaded Afghanistan if the Taliban had nukes? I think that Bush, AFTER THE ELECTION, must say: The fact that a terrorist supporting country has nuclear weapons does not mean that they are immune from attack, it just means that nuclear weapons are now authorized to be used on them. Up the ante by upping the threat if they have nuclear weapons. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Rigby" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:58:01 -0400, NOYB wrote: There are terrorists, terrorist sympathizers, and Democrats. Lately, they all sound remarkably alike. Just curious, after 9/11, did you think bin Laden would still be running loose three years later? I sure as hell didn't. I figured six months, a year at the outside, and he would be brought to justice. The most powerful country on this planet, and he is still rubbing our nose in it. I blame Bush for that, who the hell do you blame? I blame the Pakistani people who are willing to overthrow Musharraf if he allows US troops into Northwestern Pakistan with the intent to permanently entomb bin Laden's ass in the cave he's hiding in. Pakistan is an Arabic nuclear power, but with a level-headed US-friendly guy in charge (at least "somewhat" in charge). There have been several attempts already on Musharraf's life...two of them coming when Pakistani forces pushed the furthest into Waziristan. Because of the nukes, our hands are tied...which is precisely why we must move the war on terror into Iran before they're a nuclear power. Do you think we would have invaded Afghanistan if the Taliban had nukes? I think that Bush, AFTER THE ELECTION, must say: The fact that a terrorist supporting country has nuclear weapons does not mean that they are immune from attack, it just means that nuclear weapons are now authorized to be used on them. Up the ante by upping the threat if they have nuclear weapons. That doctrine is already in place. However, the terrorist-sponsoring countries like Iran continue to wage an atypical clandestine war against the US by outsourcing the murder of Westerners to radical Islamic groups like Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and al Qaeda. The only way to stop this practice is to move the war to their backyards...but that means doing so before these countries get nukes that they can use on our troops. Pakistan is a perfect example. We know bin Laden is there, but we're afraid that sending troops into the Northwestern portion of the country would lead to a coup against Musharraf, and put the radical Islamic elements of their intel agency in charge of the nuke button. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"Clams Canino" wrote in message link.net... Bin Laden saw Moore's F-911 I see...... sigh There are terrorists, terrorist sympathizers, and Democrats. Lately, they all sound remarkably alike. You all gone over the deep end with this ****. If you honestly believe that because someone isn't a goose stepping republican, that they are automatically terrorist sympathetic, then you are indeed more ignorant than one could imagine. Do you just memorize Hannity and Rush's non-factual rantings, then repeat verbatim, without any thought? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Osama Bin Ladin Found Hanged | Boat Building | |||
Osama Found Hanged | Cruising | |||
Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! | ASA | |||
The Bush Transcript...well, sort of. | General |