| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
OT--Bush has the higher IQ
POLITICAL POINTS
Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ |
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:18:44 -0400, NOYB wrote:
POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. Probably, before all those years of drinking took it's toll.;-) Frankly, I'm more concerned with Bush's intelligence now, and, honestly, he doesn't seem that bright. |
"NOYB" wrote in message ...
POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute of Scranton, Pennsylvania detailed its findings of a four month study of the intelligence quotient of President George W. Bush. Since 1973, the Lovenstein Institute has published its research to the education community on each new president, which includes the famous "IQ" report among others. According to statements in the report, there have been twelve presidents over the past 60 years, from F. D. Roosevelt to G. W. Bush who were all rated based on scholarly achievements, writings that they alone produced without aid of staff, their ability to speak with clarity, and several other psychological factors which were then scored in the Swanson/Crain system of intelligence ranking. The study determined the following IQs of each president as accurate to within five percentage points: 147 Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) 132 Harry Truman (D) 122 Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) 174 John F. Kennedy (D) 126 Lyndon B. Johnson (D) 155 Richard M. Nixon (R) 121 Gerald R. Ford (R) 176 James E. Carter (D) 105 Ronald W. Reagan (R) 98 George H. W. Bush (R) 182 William J. Clinton (D) 91 George W. Bush (D) The six Republican presidents of the past 60 years had an average IQ of 115.5, with President Nixon having the highest IQ, at 155. President G. W. Bush was rated the lowest of all the Republicans with an IQ of 91. The six Democrat presidents had IQs with an average of 156, with President Clinton having the highest IQ, at 182. President Lyndon B. Johnson was rated the lowest of all the Democrats with an IQ of 126. No president other than Carter (D) has released his actual IQ, 176. Among comments made concerning the specific testing of President GW Bush, his low ratings were due to his apparent difficulty to command the English language in public statements, his limited use of vocabulary (6,500 words for Bush versus an average of 11,000 words for other presidents), his lack of scholarly achievements other than a basic MBA, and an absence of any body of work which could be studied on an intellectual basis. The complete report documents the methods and procedures used to arrive at these ratings, including depth of sentence structure and voice stress confidence analysis. "All the Presidents prior to George W. Bush had a least one book under their belt, and most had written several white papers during their education or early careers.. Not so with President Bush," Dr. Lovenstein said. "He has no published works or writings, so in many ways that made it more difficult to arrive at an assessment. We had to rely more heavily on transcripts of his unscripted public speaking." The Lovenstein Institute of Scranton Pennsylvania think tank includes high caliber historians, psychiatrists, sociologists, scientists in human behavior, and psychologists. Among their ranks are Dr. Werner R. Lovenstein, world-renowned sociologist, and Professor Patricia F. Dilliams, a world-respected psychiatrist. This study was commissioned on February 13, 2001, and released on July 9, 2001, to subscribing member universities and organizations within the education community. |
As if we needed a study to tell us all this?
Capt. Jeff |
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." |
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." Once again asslicker proves why he is "King of the NG idiots" LMAO |
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." That's our Bassy. ;-) |
"JimH" wrote in message ...
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." That's our Bassy. ;-) Uh, you can believe what you want, Jimmy, but it's a hoax only in the minds of you right wing goose steppers. The folks in Germany during Hitler's reign, for the most part, were the same, they'd never believe their leader to be anything short of miraculous. |
"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." Once again asslicker proves why he is "King of the NG idiots" LMAO Once again, Fritz proves he is very bitter over his wife running off. Apparently, the divorce support isn't working too well. To pump up his very flat ego, he has to resort to a tactic that small children use, that is, start name calling. He's very good at it in a newsgroup, hiding behind anonymity, again, like a child. Now, go he http://www.lovenstein.org |
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
"basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." And I knew you'd be stupid enough, or at least goose-stepper to the party enough, that you'd not understand what you've read. Go he http://www.lovenstein.org |
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "JimH" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." That's our Bassy. ;-) Uh, you can believe what you want, Jimmy, but it's a hoax only in the minds of you right wing goose steppers. The folks in Germany during Hitler's reign, for the most part, were the same, they'd never believe their leader to be anything short of miraculous. Did you miss this part: "...*non-existent* Lovenstein Institute " Not a hoax? So then where's the Lovenstein Institute located? |
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." Once again asslicker proves why he is "King of the NG idiots" LMAO Once again, Fritz proves he is very bitter over his wife running off. Apparently, the divorce support isn't working too well. To pump up his very flat ego, he has to resort to a tactic that small children use, that is, start name calling. He's very good at it in a newsgroup, hiding behind anonymity, again, like a child. Now, go he http://www.lovenstein.org You really are making it too easy for me. I almost feel guilty preying on the stupid. But here goes: Urban Legends and Folklore The Lovenstein Institute Urban Legends and Folklore Blog From David Emery, Your Guide to Urban Legends and Folklore. August 18, 2004 The Lovenstein Institute Note from a reader regarding the "G.W. Bush Has a Low IQ" hoax: "Hmm, you said you could find no trace of the Lovenstein Institute. That's strange, because a Google search yielded http://lovenstein.org/. I wonder how much you actually researched this? In light of Bush's foreign policy (or lack thereof) and decision-making processes, I find it hard not to believe he has the IQ of kitty litter. Used kitty litter, to be specific." Allow me to direct your attention to the WHOIS registration for lovenstein.org, which states that the Internet domain wasn't created until August 7, 2001 - one month after the infamous Bush IQ hoax began circulating via email. Note, too, that the listing is full of phony contact information. Whoever really owns the unabashedly anti-Bush Website doesn't want their identity known. As for the fabled Lovenstein Institute itself, I'm afraid it still doesn't exist, nor can wishing make it so. http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/a/106301.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------- If the note from the reader had the words "wild allegations", I'd be sure that basskisser wrote it. Instead, I can only guess that he did. |
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." And I knew you'd be stupid enough, or at least goose-stepper to the party enough, that you'd not understand what you've read. Go he http://www.lovenstein.org http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/a/106301.htm You are officially "King of the Dip****s" |
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... http://www.lovenstein.org Great link. http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/a/106301.htm |
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." Once again asslicker proves why he is "King of the NG idiots" LMAO Once again, Fritz proves he is very bitter over his wife running off. Apparently, the divorce support isn't working too well. To pump up his very flat ego, he has to resort to a tactic that small children use, that is, start name calling. He's very good at it in a newsgroup, hiding behind anonymity, again, like a child. Now, go he http://www.lovenstein.org You really are making it too easy for me. I almost feel guilty preying on the stupid. But here goes: Urban Legends and Folklore The Lovenstein Institute Urban Legends and Folklore Blog From David Emery, Your Guide to Urban Legends and Folklore. August 18, 2004 The Lovenstein Institute Note from a reader regarding the "G.W. Bush Has a Low IQ" hoax: "Hmm, you said you could find no trace of the Lovenstein Institute. That's strange, because a Google search yielded http://lovenstein.org/. I wonder how much you actually researched this? In light of Bush's foreign policy (or lack thereof) and decision-making processes, I find it hard not to believe he has the IQ of kitty litter. Used kitty litter, to be specific." Allow me to direct your attention to the WHOIS registration for lovenstein.org, which states that the Internet domain wasn't created until August 7, 2001 - one month after the infamous Bush IQ hoax began circulating via email. Note, too, that the listing is full of phony contact information. Whoever really owns the unabashedly anti-Bush Website doesn't want their identity known. As for the fabled Lovenstein Institute itself, I'm afraid it still doesn't exist, nor can wishing make it so. http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/a/106301.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------- If the note from the reader had the words "wild allegations", I'd be sure that basskisser wrote it. Instead, I can only guess that he did. But Chuck thought that Bassy provided quite an interesting link. LOL! |
|
"basskisser" wrote in message And I knew you'd be stupid enough, or at least goose-stepper to the party enough, that you'd not understand what you've read. Go he http://www.lovenstein.org God, you must have grown up never having been trained in the use of vacuum cleaners, you get sucked in so regularly. That is no legitimate site. They claim to be a "...think tank employing high caliber historians, psychiatrists, sociologists, scientists in human behavior, and psychologists. Among their ranks are Dr. Werner R. Lovenstein, world-renowned sociologist, and Professor Patricia F. Dilliams, a world-respected psychiatrist." And yet, their featured piece is written only to a ninth-grade level, and rather poorly at that. Note their disclaimers -- "... Copyrighted material used on Lovenstein.org may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.. " In other words, they just steal stuff from other sites, or just make it up. This is nothing more than yet another batch of anti-Bush brain vomit. Now, you go check out urbanlegends.about.com/library/bliq-bush.htm And please, ---- don't come back with the old "... I knew it was phony all along..." line. |
"JimH" wrote in message ... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... http://www.lovenstein.org Great link. LOL! At least guys like Chuck and basskisser are good for entertainment purposes, if nothing else. |
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." Once again asslicker proves why he is "King of the NG idiots" LMAO Once again, Fritz proves he is very bitter over his wife running off. Apparently, the divorce support isn't working too well. To pump up his very flat ego, he has to resort to a tactic that small children use, that is, start name calling. He's very good at it in a newsgroup, hiding behind anonymity, again, like a child. Now, go he http://www.lovenstein.org You really are making it too easy for me. I almost feel guilty preying on the stupid. But here goes: Urban Legends and Folklore The Lovenstein Institute Urban Legends and Folklore Blog From David Emery, Your Guide to Urban Legends and Folklore. August 18, 2004 The Lovenstein Institute Note from a reader regarding the "G.W. Bush Has a Low IQ" hoax: "Hmm, you said you could find no trace of the Lovenstein Institute. That's strange, because a Google search yielded http://lovenstein.org/. I wonder how much you actually researched this? In light of Bush's foreign policy (or lack thereof) and decision-making processes, I find it hard not to believe he has the IQ of kitty litter. Used kitty litter, to be specific." Allow me to direct your attention to the WHOIS registration for lovenstein.org, which states that the Internet domain wasn't created until August 7, 2001 - one month after the infamous Bush IQ hoax began circulating via email. Note, too, that the listing is full of phony contact information. Whoever really owns the unabashedly anti-Bush Website doesn't want their identity known. As for the fabled Lovenstein Institute itself, I'm afraid it still doesn't exist, nor can wishing make it so. Poor asslicker...... he's too stupid to realize how stupid he is. He truely is the King of the NG idiots. http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/a/106301.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------- If the note from the reader had the words "wild allegations", I'd be sure that basskisser wrote it. Instead, I can only guess that he did. |
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "JimH" wrote in message ... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... http://www.lovenstein.org Great link. LOL! At least guys like Chuck and basskisser are good for entertainment purposes, if nothing else. It is quite comical to see asslicker flounce around.......did you notice his whine about me hiding behind 'anonymity' What a mar00n |
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message And I knew you'd be stupid enough, or at least goose-stepper to the party enough, that you'd not understand what you've read. Go he http://www.lovenstein.org God, you must have grown up never having been trained in the use of vacuum cleaners, you get sucked in so regularly. He just can't see throught the 'brown fog' where his head is at. That is no legitimate site. They claim to be a "...think tank employing high caliber historians, psychiatrists, sociologists, scientists in human behavior, and psychologists. Among their ranks are Dr. Werner R. Lovenstein, world-renowned sociologist, and Professor Patricia F. Dilliams, a world-respected psychiatrist." And yet, their featured piece is written only to a ninth-grade level, and rather poorly at that. Note their disclaimers -- "... Copyrighted material used on Lovenstein.org may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.. " In other words, they just steal stuff from other sites, or just make it up. This is nothing more than yet another batch of anti-Bush brain vomit. Now, you go check out urbanlegends.about.com/library/bliq-bush.htm And please, ---- don't come back with the old "... I knew it was phony all along..." line. |
But Chuck thought that Bassy provided quite an interesting link. LOL!
I thought the essay that appeared when I followed the link was well written. Observed trend: With the major exception of Harry Krause, it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend to post messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with contrasting perspectives. Can the same be said about the right wingers? |
NOYB,
The Lovenstein Institute is located in the mind of those who suffer from FAS. "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "JimH" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... POLITICAL POINTS Secret Weapon for Bush? By JOHN TIERNEY To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry. That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's. Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations. Mr. Bush's score on the a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force" onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test. Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/ That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush quite a bit lower: WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you look stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected. "Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax." That's our Bassy. ;-) Uh, you can believe what you want, Jimmy, but it's a hoax only in the minds of you right wing goose steppers. The folks in Germany during Hitler's reign, for the most part, were the same, they'd never believe their leader to be anything short of miraculous. Did you miss this part: "...*non-existent* Lovenstein Institute " Not a hoax? So then where's the Lovenstein Institute located? |
Gould,
Have you sunk to the intellectual level of Bass? Please tell me you were joking. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... http://www.lovenstein.org Great link. |
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... But Chuck thought that Bassy provided quite an interesting link. LOL! I thought the essay that appeared when I followed the link was well written. Observed trend: With the major exception of Harry Krause, it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend to post messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with contrasting perspectives. Can the same be said about the right wingers? Give me a friggin break. You do it quite often Chuck so don't start crying when it happens to you. You stepped in it big time and I made light of it. Big deal. Move on already and stop whining as you seem to be doing quite often lately. |
"Jon Smithe" wrote in message news:PLagd.331157$D%.183470@attbi_s51... Gould, Have you sunk to the intellectual level of Bass? Please tell me you were joking. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... http://www.lovenstein.org Great link. Better watch out Jon or Chuck will take his bat and ball and run home crying because you are picking on him. |
Gould,
When I was having discussions with you, you suddenly started posting messages criticizing and belittling me, just because I had a contrasting perspective. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... With the major exception of Harry Krause, it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend to post messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with contrasting perspectives. Can the same be said about the right wingers? |
PS - Have you ever looked at any of Basskisser's messages? Besides telling
everyone they are stupid what has he ever said of any value? "Jon Smithe" wrote in message news:_6bgd.326661$3l3.251921@attbi_s03... Gould, When I was having discussions with you, you suddenly started posting messages criticizing and belittling me, just because I had a contrasting perspective. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... With the major exception of Harry Krause, it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend to post messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with contrasting perspectives. Can the same be said about the right wingers? |
Gould,
Have you sunk to the intellectual level of Bass? Please tell me you were joking. What? Not posting as Harry Krause today? I enjoyed the essay that appeared when I followed bass's link. Good to see you back, I was sure you had committed Harry Kerry. :-) |
Better watch out Jon or Chuck will take his bat and ball and run home crying
because you are picking on him. Some folks have no bat, nor balls. |
Gosh...I've been promoted to Major Exception!
Do I get a chevron or something? With a little luck and hard work, I believe a Major Exception can be promoted to a General Exception. :-) |
Gould,
When I was having discussions with you, you suddenly started posting messages criticizing and belittling me, just because I had a contrasting right wingers apparently don't do nuance. You and I have a discussion. I think you're full of crap and I tell you so. "to your face" if you will. You and I have a discussion. You think I'm full of crap so you start a side conversation with LOL JimH or somebody else to kick that fact back and forth between you. You see no difference? That's the trend I was observing. |
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Better watch out Jon or Chuck will take his bat and ball and run home crying because you are picking on him. Some folks have no bat, nor balls. Maybe some day you will get a bat....and balls. ;-) |
Gould,
The OT posts in rec.boats are nothing more than mental floss, it is a way to pass the time and have fun. I was poking a little fun at Harry and is obsession with cut and pasting articles. I would hope that no one would think Harry was posting the most ridiculous articles under the sun, using the email address of , but I guess I was wrong. Still it was fun for a few days. It would have sucked if I really had committed Harry Kerry. ; ) I am glad that you were not sucked into believing it was a real institute. ; ) "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Gould, Have you sunk to the intellectual level of Bass? Please tell me you were joking. What? Not posting as Harry Krause today? I enjoyed the essay that appeared when I followed bass's link. Good to see you back, I was sure you had committed Harry Kerry. :-) |
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Gould, When I was having discussions with you, you suddenly started posting messages criticizing and belittling me, just because I had a contrasting right wingers apparently don't do nuance. You and I have a discussion. I think you're full of crap and I tell you so. "to your face" if you will. You and I have a discussion. You think I'm full of crap so you start a side conversation with LOL JimH or somebody else to kick that fact back and forth between you. You see no difference? That's the trend I was observing. Gee Chuck, you can tell someone something to their face on the internet? Interesting spin. You stepped in it big time and were not man enough to laugh it off. This whining of yours is getting old. |
(Gould 0738) wrote in message ...
http://www.lovenstein.org Great link. Better link: http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/presiq.htm Claim: According to a study by the Lovenstein Institute, President Bush has the lowest IQ of all presidents of past 50 years. Status: False. Origins: No, this isn't a real news report, nor does it describe a real study. There isn't a "Lovenstein Institute" in Scranton, Pennsylvania (or anywhere else in the USA), nor do any of the people quoted in the story exist, because this is just another spoof that was taken too seriously. The article quoted above began circulating on the Internet during the summer of 2001. In furtherance of the hoax, later that year pranksters thought to register www.lovenstein.org and erecting a web site around it in an attempt to fool people into thinking there really was such an institute. |
You stepped in it big time and were not man enough to laugh it off. This
whining of yours is getting old. I hope it annoys the hell out of you. |
"Jon Smithe" wrote in message news:labgd.17310$HA.9663@attbi_s01... PS - Have you ever looked at any of Basskisser's messages? Besides telling everyone they are stupid what has he ever said of any value? Don't you remember his 'cow downing' post? LMAO "Jon Smithe" wrote in message news:_6bgd.326661$3l3.251921@attbi_s03... Gould, When I was having discussions with you, you suddenly started posting messages criticizing and belittling me, just because I had a contrasting perspective. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... With the major exception of Harry Krause, it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend to post messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with contrasting perspectives. Can the same be said about the right wingers? |
Sort of like the side conversation you and Harry are always doing.
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Gould, When I was having discussions with you, you suddenly started posting messages criticizing and belittling me, just because I had a contrasting right wingers apparently don't do nuance. You and I have a discussion. I think you're full of crap and I tell you so. "to your face" if you will. You and I have a discussion. You think I'm full of crap so you start a side conversation with LOL JimH or somebody else to kick that fact back and forth between you. You see no difference? That's the trend I was observing. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com