"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

And I knew you'd be stupid enough, or at least goose-stepper to the
party enough, that you'd not understand what you've read. Go he

http://www.lovenstein.org

God, you must have grown up never having been trained in the use of vacuum
cleaners, you get sucked in so regularly.

He just can't see throught the 'brown fog' where his head is at.


That is no legitimate site. They
claim to be a "...think tank employing high caliber historians,
psychiatrists, sociologists, scientists in human behavior, and
psychologists. Among their ranks are Dr. Werner R. Lovenstein,
world-renowned sociologist, and Professor Patricia F. Dilliams, a
world-respected psychiatrist."

And yet, their featured piece is written only to a ninth-grade level, and
rather poorly at that.

Note their disclaimers -- "... Copyrighted material used on Lovenstein.org
may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.. "

In other words, they just steal stuff from other sites, or just make it
up.

This is nothing more than yet another batch of anti-Bush brain vomit.

Now, you go check out urbanlegends.about.com/library/bliq-bush.htm

And please, ---- don't come back with the old "... I knew it was phony all
along..." line.

But Chuck thought that Bassy provided quite an interesting link. LOL!


I thought the essay that appeared when I followed the link was well written.

Observed trend:

With the major exception of Harry Krause,
it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend to post
messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with contrasting
perspectives.

Can the same be said about the right wingers?

NOYB,
The Lovenstein Institute is located in the mind of those who suffer from
FAS.


"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" atl_man2@a
href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com"
onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in
message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
POLITICAL POINTS
Secret Weapon for Bush?
By JOHN TIERNEY

To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from
the
military records of the two presidential candidates: the young
George W.
Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry.

That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative
columnist
at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential
I.Q.'s.
During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr.
Bush's
SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points
lower
than Al Gore's.

Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a
comparison
of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They
are
not
formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to
make
reasonable extrapolations.

Mr. Bush's score on the a
href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force"
onmouseover="window.status='a
href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=air%20force"
onmouseover="window.status='Air Force'; return true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a'; return
true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"Air Force/a Officer
Qualifying Test at age 22 again
suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about
the
95th
percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's
I.Q.
was
about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's
extrapolation
of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test.

Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware,
called
it a
creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or
that so
many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will
often
be
misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something
complicated
they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said.



http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/trail/

That's odd, the study below seems just as plausible, and puts Bush
quite a bit lower:
WASHINGTON --In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute

I knew that you'd be stupid enough to post that, so I intentionally
snipped the following part of the NY Times article just to make you
look
stupid. Congratulations for coming through as expected.



"Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the
Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr.
Bush's
I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that
report
from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax."





That's our Bassy. ;-)

Uh, you can believe what you want, Jimmy, but it's a hoax only in the
minds of you right wing goose steppers. The folks in Germany during
Hitler's reign, for the most part, were the same, they'd never believe
their leader to be anything short of miraculous.

Did you miss this part: "...*non-existent* Lovenstein Institute "

Not a hoax? So then where's the Lovenstein Institute located?

Gould,
Have you sunk to the intellectual level of Bass? Please tell me you were
joking.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
http://www.lovenstein.org

Great link.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
But Chuck thought that Bassy provided quite an interesting link. LOL!


I thought the essay that appeared when I followed the link was well
written.

Observed trend:

With the major exception of Harry Krause,
it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend to
post
messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with contrasting
perspectives.

Can the same be said about the right wingers?


Give me a friggin break.

You do it quite often Chuck so don't start crying when it happens to you.
You stepped in it big time and I made light of it. Big deal. Move on
already and stop whining as you seem to be doing quite often lately.

"Jon Smithe" wrote in message
news:PLagd.331157$D%.183470@attbi_s51...
Gould,
Have you sunk to the intellectual level of Bass? Please tell me you were
joking.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
http://www.lovenstein.org

Great link.



Better watch out Jon or Chuck will take his bat and ball and run home crying
because you are picking on him.

Gould,
When I was having discussions with you, you suddenly started posting
messages criticizing and belittling me, just because I had a contrasting
perspective.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
With the major exception of Harry Krause,
it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend to
post
messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with contrasting
perspectives.

Can the same be said about the right wingers?

PS - Have you ever looked at any of Basskisser's messages? Besides telling
everyone they are stupid what has he ever said of any value?


"Jon Smithe" wrote in message
news:_6bgd.326661$3l3.251921@attbi_s03...
Gould,
When I was having discussions with you, you suddenly started posting
messages criticizing and belittling me, just because I had a contrasting
perspective.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
With the major exception of Harry Krause,
it seems like very few of the moderates and liberals in this group tend
to post
messages to one another criticizing and belittling people with
contrasting
perspectives.

Can the same be said about the right wingers?

Gould,
Have you sunk to the intellectual level of Bass? Please tell me you were
joking.

What? Not posting as Harry Krause today? I enjoyed the essay that appeared
when I followed bass's link.

Good to see you back, I was sure you had committed Harry Kerry. :-)

Better watch out Jon or Chuck will take his bat and ball and run home crying
because you are picking on him.

Some folks have no bat, nor balls.