Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please, righties, read with an open mind:
From Jon Carrol: An acquaintance of mine, Ted Webster, has thought of a fine bumper sticker. Goes like this: "If Dean Is Too Liberal Why Don't We All Just Shoot Ourselves?" Yes, the dangerous radical who threatens our very way of life is the last in a long line of zany socialistic Vermont governors. They're almost Canadian. Leftie Dean cut state income twice and cut the state sales tax entirely, and increased prison terms for felons. He is also, of course, opposed to an unprovoked invasion of a foreign country. He is opposed to lying about the reasons for the attack. This used to be an honorable opinion. In the past, opposition to war often came from people who'd served in the previous one. That opinion was treated seriously, even when it was wrong. Franklin Roosevelt thought it was necessary to convince the American public that war against the Germans and Japanese was a good idea. His main opposition came from conservative Republican senators. Everyone understood why they did not want to get involved in a European struggle -- the horror that was World War I was less than 20 years in the past. Vietnam is almost 30 years away; you'd think we might at least entertain the notion that fighting a war half a world away is a bad idea. So it used to be OK to hold an opinion different from that held by the president of the United States. Now doing so leaves you open for accusations of treason, which is how Howard Dean got to be the fighting liberal. Swell. Howard Dean said the United States was rendered "no safer" by the capture of Saddam Hussein. This is of course true; no one seriously disputes it. It may be that the capture of Saddam Hussein makes American soldiers in Iraq safer, although it's too soon to know that. Let us hope it does; if Iraq turns into a grinding war of attrition, we'll be chin deep in the Big Muddy with rain predicted. I'm not sure whether you were watching television when Dean made his statement. It was like a bomb going off. Commentators could not believe their ears. The look on their faces was precious. It was all, "Am I going to lose my job for allowing that on the air?" Those guys and gals seem to be a little nervous. So here we all were, rejoicing over the bad dental work and scruffy appearance of the onetime dictator, and here Dean was raining on our parade. Typical Vermont behavior -- Calvin Coolidge was no fun at parties either. So let's review briefly why the capture of Saddam Hussein does not make America any safer. On Sept. 11, 2001, there was an unprovoked attack on American cities. It shortly emerged that this attack was the work of radical Muslims, what we now call "Jihadists" to differentiate them from the vast majority of non-radical non-murderous Muslims. Iraq under Saddam Hussein was a secular nation. Its women were unveiled; the sexes mingled freely in public places; Shariah was not the law of the land. Thus and therefore, it is unlikely that Iraq had anything to do with the Sept. 11 attacks, despite the administration's attempt to dig up at least one meeting between someone and someone else somewhere. It is generally agreed that Osama bin Laden was responsible for those attacks. Bin Laden is now almost certainly holed up in Pakistan, our wonderful ally and great good friend. In other words: The guy who actually attacked us is getting a free ride (and also helping in the effort to destabilize Afghanistan, our other client state in the region), while a guy who had nothing to do with attacking us is in custody. So what Howard Dean said is not radical or remarkable or innovative. I mean, he's an interesting guy, and I might even find myself voting for him, but he's not Roosevelt or anything. He just hasn't signed on to the Official Bush/Cheney/Wolfowitz worldview, which makes him a suspicious character indeed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- One really interesting thing about Bush is his iron discipline at news conferences. No matter what the question, he says what he came into the room to say. It doesn't even need to make sense. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Off the Topic. I'm waiting to see... | General |