"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

starwars wrote:


On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Q wrote:


On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:39:14 -0400, Eisboch
wrote:



His remarks regarding
Cheney's daughter (however intended)

Cheney's daughter is working in the BushCo campaign. She is open for
discussion. This is a non-issue, so shut the **** up.

--
Q

You don't have any class or ethics.



If Mary Cheney were still in the closet, it would have been
inappropriate. Ms. Cheney, however, is openly gay. In fact, she flaunts
her sexual preference. During the GOP convention, she sat in the VP's
box with her gay partner. Her private sector job was as a liaison to
the
gay community as an employee of Coors Brewing.

MAry's parents obviously are upset with their daughter's sexual
preference, and they support Bush's plan to take a right away from
gays.

The righties are pandering to their small-minded pseudo-Christian base.
You obviously are a part the small-minded.



Now Harry, I may be small-minded to some, but pseudo-Christian I am not.

Eisboch

I don't believe you to be small-minded or pseudo anything. You sort of
remind me of the old style responsible Republican moderates, the ones
that helped make this country a better place to live.




Funny to see you squirm with someone who you admire and respect yet
continuously proves you wrong.

I the reply to you were made by me, JohnH, Jon Smith and the same it
would be totally different.

Dance Krause....dance....LMAO!

My fault. I got the names and replys messed up.

Harry's ok. I don't agree with his politics much, nor does he with mine,
but it's always an agreeable disagreement. Same with Gould.

It's when the focus shifts from healthy debate to frustrated name calling
that the threads in the NG spiral out of control.

It's good to mulch other ideas or philosophys once in a while. Sometimes
you learn something and modify your own positions. Sometimes your
position simply becomes stronger in your mind.

Eisboch (going to watch the Sox/Yankees now)


Despite our recent differences on the undecided vote I have always thought
you to be among the more restrained and intelligent posters to this NG. My
opinion has not changed despite our recent differences.

Regarding Harry Krause though, I do disagree with you. The man is a nut
case, a stalker and a frustrated wanna-be. I think most of the NG shares my
feelings, especially since he recently wished death and catastrophe to the
republican member family's. ;-)