Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not trying to be sarcastic here or question your knowledge, but
this seems to contradict your comment about a decrease in speed. Comments? I'm just trying to understand. Thanks, Bob Bob: Assumptions include: 1. You are not retuning your engine for the high altitude operation, and will be running a mixture somewhat lean on oxygen. 2. That you have two different size props for a valid reason, i.e. your boat needs the decreased resistance of the smaller diameter prop to achieve proper RPM at the higher elevation. If your boat runs the same at the higher elevation with the larger prop, why the H would you bother to screw around changing it? Without resorting to charts, graphs, theories, and etc: *If* your engine had been achieving proper RPM at the high altitude only because you had previously been swapping out the props........(please read the first paragraph of my response more carefully), running the larger prop could create an overpropped condition and the results would have been as I described. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What are the pros and cons of a folding prop? | Cruising | |||
Angle of prop shaft - theoretical question. | General | |||
High Thrust vs. Low for Kicker | Boat Building | |||
Volvo 270 outdrive prop cone replacement? | General | |||
Removing lower unit from 40 hp Johnson outboard - Help? | General |