OT BuschCo changing story on WMD's.....again
 

After the Bremmer report, in which he says that non only did Saddam
NOT have WMD's, but that he, BY HIS CHOICE, didn't have them, BushCo
now says that we went to war because he MIGHT have had the ability to
share information with terrorists. Now THAT'S a great reason to go to
war! Every country in the world MIGHT have the ability to share
information with terrorists. Even the world's scariest terrorist,
Bush!

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:54 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:


It's so funny to hear the right wing *insist* that the war was *never*
about WMD, when just two years ago that was all they talked about.

Some people find it quite difficult to admit to themselves, let alone
others, that they were wrong. I don't have a cite, but remember quite
clearly, a survey done after Watergate. The question was, who *did* you
vote for in the last election. McGovern won by a landslide.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:54 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:


It's so funny to hear the right wing *insist* that the war was *never*
about WMD, when just two years ago that was all they talked about.

Some people find it quite difficult to admit to themselves, let alone
others, that they were wrong. I don't have a cite, but remember quite
clearly, a survey done after Watergate. The question was, who *did* you
vote for in the last election. McGovern won by a landslide.

It was indeed one of several reasons we went in and I don't recall hearing
about republicans saying otherwise.

Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in?

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:29:52 -0400, JimH wrote:


It was indeed one of several reasons we went in and I don't recall hearing
about republicans saying otherwise.

Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in?

I guess it was something the President said:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html

"JimH" wrote in message ...
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:54 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:


It's so funny to hear the right wing *insist* that the war was *never*
about WMD, when just two years ago that was all they talked about.

Some people find it quite difficult to admit to themselves, let alone
others, that they were wrong. I don't have a cite, but remember quite
clearly, a survey done after Watergate. The question was, who *did* you
vote for in the last election. McGovern won by a landslide.

It was indeed one of several reasons we went in and I don't recall hearing
about republicans saying otherwise.

Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in?

Well, hell, let's go over the OTHER reasons that Bush said we went
there. It changed every week or so when people found out that the
previous week's lies were just that.....lies.

"basskisser" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:54 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:


It's so funny to hear the right wing *insist* that the war was *never*
about WMD, when just two years ago that was all they talked about.

Some people find it quite difficult to admit to themselves, let alone
others, that they were wrong. I don't have a cite, but remember quite
clearly, a survey done after Watergate. The question was, who *did*
you
vote for in the last election. McGovern won by a landslide.

It was indeed one of several reasons we went in and I don't recall
hearing
about republicans saying otherwise.

Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in?

Well, hell, let's go over the OTHER reasons that Bush said we went
there. It changed every week or so when people found out that the
previous week's lies were just that.....lies.

The reasons for going in have never changed.

Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in?

I guess it was something the President said:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html

The left should know better than to believe President Bush about anything.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in?

I guess it was something the President said:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html

The left should know better than to believe President Bush about anything.

So can you point out the section of the speech where Bush said WMD were the
only reason for us going in Chuck?

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in?

I guess it was something the President said:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html

The left should know better than to believe President Bush about
anything.

So can you point out the section of the speech where Bush said WMD were
the
only reason for us going in Chuck?


Of course he can't. Chuck has already made up his mind to support Kerry,
and anything that might require actual thought is outside of Chuckie's realm
of capability.

Of course he can't. Chuck has already made up his mind to support Kerry,
and anything that might require actual thought is outside of Chuckie's realm
of capability.

Dr....

There could have been a WMD on every city block in Baghdad and I wouldn't be
voting for Bush.

Kerry is a crappy candidate. How sad that crappy as he is, he is clearly the
better choice. Look how deeply we are mired in the results of your guy's lies
and delusions. At least with a fresh start, it will take another four years to
get the point where you can't believe the government on
*anything*.

Your guy won by 500 votes (?) last time around, and thought it was a mandate to
take the country ridiculously to the right.
Spare us from his delusional zeal if he manages to hoodwink enough folks to be
reelected.