![]() |
OT BuschCo changing story on WMD's.....again
After the Bremmer report, in which he says that non only did Saddam
NOT have WMD's, but that he, BY HIS CHOICE, didn't have them, BushCo now says that we went to war because he MIGHT have had the ability to share information with terrorists. Now THAT'S a great reason to go to war! Every country in the world MIGHT have the ability to share information with terrorists. Even the world's scariest terrorist, Bush! |
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:54 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:
It's so funny to hear the right wing *insist* that the war was *never* about WMD, when just two years ago that was all they talked about. Some people find it quite difficult to admit to themselves, let alone others, that they were wrong. I don't have a cite, but remember quite clearly, a survey done after Watergate. The question was, who *did* you vote for in the last election. McGovern won by a landslide. |
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:54 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote: It's so funny to hear the right wing *insist* that the war was *never* about WMD, when just two years ago that was all they talked about. Some people find it quite difficult to admit to themselves, let alone others, that they were wrong. I don't have a cite, but remember quite clearly, a survey done after Watergate. The question was, who *did* you vote for in the last election. McGovern won by a landslide. It was indeed one of several reasons we went in and I don't recall hearing about republicans saying otherwise. Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in? |
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:29:52 -0400, JimH wrote:
It was indeed one of several reasons we went in and I don't recall hearing about republicans saying otherwise. Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in? I guess it was something the President said: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html |
"JimH" wrote in message ...
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:54 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote: It's so funny to hear the right wing *insist* that the war was *never* about WMD, when just two years ago that was all they talked about. Some people find it quite difficult to admit to themselves, let alone others, that they were wrong. I don't have a cite, but remember quite clearly, a survey done after Watergate. The question was, who *did* you vote for in the last election. McGovern won by a landslide. It was indeed one of several reasons we went in and I don't recall hearing about republicans saying otherwise. Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in? Well, hell, let's go over the OTHER reasons that Bush said we went there. It changed every week or so when people found out that the previous week's lies were just that.....lies. |
"basskisser" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:54 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote: It's so funny to hear the right wing *insist* that the war was *never* about WMD, when just two years ago that was all they talked about. Some people find it quite difficult to admit to themselves, let alone others, that they were wrong. I don't have a cite, but remember quite clearly, a survey done after Watergate. The question was, who *did* you vote for in the last election. McGovern won by a landslide. It was indeed one of several reasons we went in and I don't recall hearing about republicans saying otherwise. Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in? Well, hell, let's go over the OTHER reasons that Bush said we went there. It changed every week or so when people found out that the previous week's lies were just that.....lies. The reasons for going in have never changed. |
Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in?
I guess it was something the President said: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html The left should know better than to believe President Bush about anything. |
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in? I guess it was something the President said: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html The left should know better than to believe President Bush about anything. So can you point out the section of the speech where Bush said WMD were the only reason for us going in Chuck? |
"JimH" wrote in message ... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in? I guess it was something the President said: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html The left should know better than to believe President Bush about anything. So can you point out the section of the speech where Bush said WMD were the only reason for us going in Chuck? Of course he can't. Chuck has already made up his mind to support Kerry, and anything that might require actual thought is outside of Chuckie's realm of capability. |
Of course he can't. Chuck has already made up his mind to support Kerry,
and anything that might require actual thought is outside of Chuckie's realm of capability. Dr.... There could have been a WMD on every city block in Baghdad and I wouldn't be voting for Bush. Kerry is a crappy candidate. How sad that crappy as he is, he is clearly the better choice. Look how deeply we are mired in the results of your guy's lies and delusions. At least with a fresh start, it will take another four years to get the point where you can't believe the government on *anything*. Your guy won by 500 votes (?) last time around, and thought it was a mandate to take the country ridiculously to the right. Spare us from his delusional zeal if he manages to hoodwink enough folks to be reelected. |
NOYB wrote:
Harry has criticized Bush for just reading the headlines and not the stories...but the hypocrisy here is unbelievable. Did you watch any of Duelfer's testimony, Harry? Read any of the transcripts? Read any of the summaries in the actual report? It's 1500 pages long, and you summarize it a five words: "no weapons of mass destruction"? Sheesh...talk about intellectually lazy. Yeah, I thought it was especially pathetic when Senator Warner tossed pro-Bush softballs his way. But the most telling remark in the areas you're trying to bring to the forefront concerned Saddam and his posturing...he didn't have the WMDs, but he wanted Iran to think he did. Bush blew our credibility around the world. -- "...vice president (Cheney), I'm surprised to hear him talk about records. When he was one of 435 members of the United States House, he was one of 10 to vote against Head Start, one of four to vote against banning plastic weapons that can pass through metal detectors. He voted against the Department of Education. He voted against funding for Meals on Wheels for seniors. He voted against a holiday for Martin Luther King. He voted against a resolution calling for the release of Nelson Mandela in South Africa. It's amazing to hear him criticize either my record or John Kerry's." - Senator John Edwards, 10/05/04 |
On 08 Oct 2004 16:27:32 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:
Your guy won by 500 votes (?) An opportune time to bring back up the voter fraud that happened in Florida. The right likes to make jokes about the stupid voters in Palm Beach county, but thousands of black voters in other counties either were denied the right to vote, or had their vote thrown out. http://www.sptimes.com/2004/10/08/De...zes_blac.shtml "No county produced more spoiled ballots than Duval - nearly 27,000 - and they were concentrated in African-American neighborhoods. An estimated one in five black votes was tossed out in Duval, three times the rate of white votes." Little doubt this was pure fraud. Little doubt in was facilitated by Republicans with the approval of the presidents brother. Little doubt if these votes had been counted, Bush would not be the president. last time around, and thought it was a mandate to take the country ridiculously to the right. For me, that's the part that is the hardest to take. Mandate my ass, he didn't even win the election. bb |
"JimH" wrote in message ...
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in? I guess it was something the President said: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html The left should know better than to believe President Bush about anything. So can you point out the section of the speech where Bush said WMD were the only reason for us going in Chuck? Hell, no he can't! BushCo came up with completely different reasons several times! Here in lies the problem, Bush and his henchmen lied us into a war. I'm glad that you've realized that Bush changed his mind several times. |
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "JimH" wrote in message ... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Now why does the left insist that WMD were the only reason we went in? I guess it was something the President said: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html The left should know better than to believe President Bush about anything. So can you point out the section of the speech where Bush said WMD were the only reason for us going in Chuck? Hell, no he can't! BushCo came up with completely different reasons several times! Here in lies the problem, Bush and his henchmen lied us into a war. I'm glad that you've realized that Bush changed his mind several times. He has not changed his mind about anything. If you have proof to show otherwise please post it. |
In Duval, about 22,000 presidential ballots were uncounted because of double
votes and 5,000 because no presidential vote was recorded. That's the problem with a "punch card" ballot. Don't like the way somebody voted? Punch a second hole for a second candidate in the same race, after the voter leaves the building. Joila. No more "wrong" vote. To save time, you can even pass out ballots with the hole for GWB pre-punched. The votes of folks who intend to vote for GWB aren't efffected, they simply push the stylus through an already existing hole. The po' dumb folk who don't see the many advantages of a right wing reactionary in the WH? Thier votes for the wrong candidate are tossed out, "sorry, two holes punched for president." |
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... In Duval, about 22,000 presidential ballots were uncounted because of double votes and 5,000 because no presidential vote was recorded. That's the problem with a "punch card" ballot. Don't like the way somebody voted? Punch a second hole for a second candidate in the same race, after the voter leaves the building. Joila. No more "wrong" vote. To save time, you can even pass out ballots with the hole for GWB pre-punched. The votes of folks who intend to vote for GWB aren't efffected, they simply push the stylus through an already existing hole. The po' dumb folk who don't see the many advantages of a right wing reactionary in the WH? Thier votes for the wrong candidate are tossed out, "sorry, two holes punched for president." I see the black helicopters following you again Chuck. |
"JimH" wrote in message ... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... In Duval, about 22,000 presidential ballots were uncounted because of double votes and 5,000 because no presidential vote was recorded. That's the problem with a "punch card" ballot. Don't like the way somebody voted? Punch a second hole for a second candidate in the same race, after the voter leaves the building. Joila. No more "wrong" vote. To save time, you can even pass out ballots with the hole for GWB pre-punched. The votes of folks who intend to vote for GWB aren't efffected, they simply push the stylus through an already existing hole. The po' dumb folk who don't see the many advantages of a right wing reactionary in the WH? Thier votes for the wrong candidate are tossed out, "sorry, two holes punched for president." I see the black helicopters following you again Chuck. Make that "are following you again" ;-) |
You reckon that's how Clinton got in, Chuck?
John H No, but I've always had a tough time believing that 27,000 people- all living in the same county in Florida- were dumb enough to vote twice for POTUS when there probably weren't 2700 people in the entire rest of the country combined who made the same mistake. Are Floridians just particularly stupid? And all the most especially stupid just happen to live in the same county? I think not. |
|
I guess there is no safe way of voting.
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... In Duval, about 22,000 presidential ballots were uncounted because of double votes and 5,000 because no presidential vote was recorded. That's the problem with a "punch card" ballot. Don't like the way somebody voted? Punch a second hole for a second candidate in the same race, after the voter leaves the building. Joila. No more "wrong" vote. To save time, you can even pass out ballots with the hole for GWB pre-punched. The votes of folks who intend to vote for GWB aren't efffected, they simply push the stylus through an already existing hole. The po' dumb folk who don't see the many advantages of a right wing reactionary in the WH? Thier votes for the wrong candidate are tossed out, "sorry, two holes punched for president." |
Gould,
The elderly in Palm Beach County explained to the news what the problem was. A democrat was passing out cheat sheets to tell the elderly how to vote. The cheat sheet had an error which caused the double votes. The democrats controlled the election board in Palm Beach County, if we buy into your paranoia, they did a **** poor job. PS - . Where did you facts about the 2700 in the rest of the country? "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... You reckon that's how Clinton got in, Chuck? John H No, but I've always had a tough time believing that 27,000 people- all living in the same county in Florida- were dumb enough to vote twice for POTUS when there probably weren't 2700 people in the entire rest of the country combined who made the same mistake. Are Floridians just particularly stupid? And all the most especially stupid just happen to live in the same county? I think not. |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On 08 Oct 2004 22:45:29 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: In Duval, about 22,000 presidential ballots were uncounted because of double votes and 5,000 because no presidential vote was recorded. That's the problem with a "punch card" ballot. Don't like the way somebody voted? Punch a second hole for a second candidate in the same race, after the voter leaves the building. Joila. No more "wrong" vote. To save time, you can even pass out ballots with the hole for GWB pre-punched. The votes of folks who intend to vote for GWB aren't efffected, they simply push the stylus through an already existing hole. The po' dumb folk who don't see the many advantages of a right wing reactionary in the WH? Thier votes for the wrong candidate are tossed out, "sorry, two holes punched for president." You reckon that's how Clinton got in, Chuck? Who knows.....but that is apparently is a tactic of the dem is Palm Beach County......to spike the ballots .....read "Stealing Elections" John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who do binary and those who don't! |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On 09 Oct 2004 00:32:18 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: You reckon that's how Clinton got in, Chuck? John H No, but I've always had a tough time believing that 27,000 people- all living in the same county in Florida- were dumb enough to vote twice for POTUS when there probably weren't 2700 people in the entire rest of the country combined who made the same mistake. Are Floridians just particularly stupid? And all the most especially stupid just happen to live in the same county? I think not. Are you asking if stupid people can congregate? Let's see how long it takes for Marion Barry to again get elected to mayor of DC. Barry's best line: "The bitch set me up!" This was uttered a few times after he was caught in a hotel room with a woman, not his wife, while he was getting ready to snort a line of coke. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com