On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:58:45 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:18:38 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:


You have shown yourself to be devoid of credibility and integrity, Harry.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Because you found a site that shows deaths in Baghdad? What a giggle.
Keep looking, John.

What I found shows your statement to have been a lie.

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


What you found was a website. There are many websites, and there is much
information simply not available on websites. In fact, generally
speaking, most good information is not available for free on websites.


No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

JohnH wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:58:45 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:18:38 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:


You have shown yourself to be devoid of credibility and integrity, Harry.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Because you found a site that shows deaths in Baghdad? What a giggle.
Keep looking, John.

What I found shows your statement to have been a lie.

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


What you found was a website. There are many websites, and there is much
information simply not available on websites. In fact, generally
speaking, most good information is not available for free on websites.


No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


Pardon me while I yawn at your puerility, John. Oh, and in response to
some earlier post of yours, while I do have respect for individual
soldiers, I have no respect whatsoever for the *institution* of the
military. Eisenhower was spot-on. Be wary of the military and the
corporations who serve it and who the military serves. Unless particular
facts are blatantly obvious, one is better off not believing much of
anything "the military" says.





--
Email sent to is never read.

Harry Krause wrote:


Oh, and in response to
some earlier post of yours, while I do have respect for individual
soldiers, I have no respect whatsoever for the *institution* of the
military. Eisenhower was spot-on. Be wary of the military and the
corporations who serve it and who the military serves. Unless particular
facts are blatantly obvious, one is better off not believing much of
anything "the military" says.

Pure horse****.

You've done nothing but repeatedly denigrate the individuals who serve
and have served to keep your freedom so you can continue to spout your
horse****. In reality, you despise them because you never did and never
will have the courage and self-sacrifice they each have.

You're a coward who sits behind a keyboard and endlessly
self-aggrandizes with lies and deceit, congratulating himself on each
sucker who falls for your crap.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---