OT--CNSnews was first to report last time too.
 

Finally discovering proof of the Saddam/terrorist link means it's curtains
for Kerry.



Yeah, we're much better off with a guy who sets off on a wild goose chase and
then hopes to beat hell that he can find *something* to justify it.

Odd that documents like this turn up just now, from a "non-appointed" source in
the Administration, isn't it? But not surprising.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 05 Oct 2004 01:17:13 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Finally discovering proof of the Saddam/terrorist link means it's
curtains
for Kerry.



Yeah, we're much better off with a guy who sets off on a wild goose chase
and
then hopes to beat hell that he can find *something* to justify it.

Odd that documents like this turn up just now, from a "non-appointed"
source in
the Administration, isn't it? But not surprising.

It's October, isn't it? Weren't you expecting a surprise?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

There are 10 kinds of people in the world,
those who do binary and those who don't!

The Oil for Food investigation may yield another big one. Russia, France,
China....all implicated, as is the UN with receiving kickback money. When
this breaks open it will be big.

As to the CNS story NOYB published, let's see how much play it gets on the
network news. My guess...none.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 05 Oct 2004 01:17:13 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Finally discovering proof of the Saddam/terrorist link means it's
curtains
for Kerry.



Yeah, we're much better off with a guy who sets off on a wild goose chase
and
then hopes to beat hell that he can find *something* to justify it.

Odd that documents like this turn up just now, from a "non-appointed"
source in
the Administration, isn't it? But not surprising.

It's October, isn't it? Weren't you expecting a surprise?


Actually, I wasn't. To me, it's no surprise that Saddam had been working
with terrorists since '93. I've been saying that since September 2001.

Gould,
You forget, Kerry was on the intelligence committee, reviewed all the same
info that the Administration saw and come to the exact some conclusion and
voted to give the administration the authority to go to war.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Finally discovering proof of the Saddam/terrorist link means it's
curtains
for Kerry.



Yeah, we're much better off with a guy who sets off on a wild goose chase
and
then hopes to beat hell that he can find *something* to justify it.

Odd that documents like this turn up just now, from a "non-appointed"
source in
the Administration, isn't it? But not surprising.

Gould,
You forget, Kerry was on the intelligence committee, reviewed all the same
info that the Administration saw and come to the exact some conclusion and
voted to give the administration the authority to go to war.

The intelligence committee reviewed all the information that the Executive
Branch chose to share at the time. By carefully selecting the information
available to Congress, the Administration could, and did, maniuplate the
outcome of the commitee deliberations.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

And I'm not grasping at straws. In October 2001, even *you* believed
Saddam
played a role in 9/11.


Yeah, I admit I believed for a moment what the POTUS was saying.

Bush wasn't even mentioning Saddam publically back in October 2001...but you
were.


So I ask you once again: What was the reason for your belief back then?

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,
You forget, Kerry was on the intelligence committee, reviewed all the same
info that the Administration saw and come to the exact some conclusion and
voted to give the administration the authority to go to war.

The intelligence committee reviewed all the information that the Executive
Branch chose to share at the time. By carefully selecting the information
available to Congress, the Administration could, and did, maniuplate the
outcome of the commitee deliberations.

Clinton was the CIC while Kerry sat on the intelligence committee. So
you're saying that bubba manipulated the data? I can believe that.

In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says...

I concur. Besides, Kerry is a lying scumbag. (Or have I said that already?)

Boy, you're a quite a judge of character. I suppose you think Bush is a
lily white truth teller?

Man, you're drifting a ways off your "no spin zone." You're spinning
faster than any of the hurricanes that passed through Florida.

jps

In article , gould0738
@aol.com says...
Finally discovering proof of the Saddam/terrorist link means it's curtains
for Kerry.



Yeah, we're much better off with a guy who sets off on a wild goose chase and
then hopes to beat hell that he can find *something* to justify it.

Odd that documents like this turn up just now, from a "non-appointed" source in
the Administration, isn't it? But not surprising.

Yes, this was Herring's biggest bitch in quitting the Washington Post.
As long as the unnamed sources agree with his point of view, it's no
problem.

Herring's clearly losing brain cells and the synapses aren't firing like
they used to.

jps

jps wrote:
In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says...

I concur. Besides, Kerry is a lying scumbag. (Or have I said that already?)

Boy, you're a quite a judge of character. I suppose you think Bush is a
lily white truth teller?

Man, you're drifting a ways off your "no spin zone." You're spinning
faster than any of the hurricanes that passed through Florida.

jps


Herring's war injuries make his head hurt when he tries to think,
so...he gave up thinking.


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?