On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 09:24:25 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 01:42:59 GMT, WaIIy
wrote:

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 21:35:08 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

...but, with a volatile electorate, who really knows...

"Bush advisers were described as ***stunned*** by how negative the
reviews were of the president's performance, which many of them regarded
as not his best but not so bad."


Stunned that their candidate came across as a barely literate
nincompoop? Why? That's what he is...

I'd be worried about the internals Harry.

I've heard this term chucked around a lot - what are the internals?

A breakdown of how people line up on specific issues, such as "Who is best
to lead the country on the war against terror".

Bush kills Kerry on all internals but the issue of healthcare.

So it's basically a poll within a poll?

Single point questions and answers?

God, only a statistician could come up with something like that. :)

All the best,

Tom
--------------

"What the hell's the deal with this newsgroup...
is there a computer terminal in the day room of
some looney bin somewhere?"

Bilgeman - circa 2004