I think you missed my point, he asks questions that are easily verified, but
he never follows up on any of his questions to say what is the truth. If
you only ask the question and don't write a report confirming or denying the
allegation, everyone is assumed guilty just by asking the question.

If Hack was really interested in knowing the truth, he would visit a few
bookstores and ask AAFES what books they do stock. He would also ask AAFES
to respond to the allegation before posting the email from an unidentified
army wife.

If he had a summary feedback on his questions, I could not find any on his
web site.




"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.

The party who wrote to sftt.org complaining that the Fort Lewis bookstore
only
displayed pro-Bush, anti-Kerry books was making an observation that can be
easily checked out by visiting the bookstore. Hackworth asked people to do
just
exactly that, as well as other on-post bookstores.
It can easily be disproven if untrue- it's a representation of a situation
that
can be investigated. It hardly qualifies as "crazy BS", even if it does
challenge you view that all is right or righteous in the Republican world.

Rush Limbaugh claims that "all liberals want is a free ride at public
expense
and a country where we all bend over in Muslim prayer three times a day".
That's a claim that cannot be verified, or refuted- simply spread and
repeated
by his many millions of not-so-bright, primarily conservative listeners.

"NOYB" wrote in message news:9fY5d.1749

When a person makes the decision to oppose Bush and support Kerry, he
aligns himself with a group made up of homosexuals, degenerates, anarchists,
pagans, atheists, Communists, Socialists, elitists, terrorists, trial
lawyers...and, worst of all, the French.

Apparently they all have more sense than you, though.