GUESS WHO'S ENDORSING JOHN KERRY????
 

The Communist Party has not endorsed any Candidate, but believes it is
important to elect Kerry and defeat Bush. From their web site: "The CPUSA
is doing our utmost to help defeat Bush"

Does this matter, no! Kerry is a liberal, he is not a communist and he can
not control what the CPUSA does.

The post was a troll, nothing more or nothing less. You can tell a post
made to the following groups
soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.barbra.streisand,alt.fan.j-garofalo,west-virginia.general,rec.boats
is only interested in starting a flame war.




"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
A boater A wrote in message
...
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:41:21 -0400, Dr. Linus Bahadur Goldfarb
wrote:

GUESS WHO'S ENDORSING JOHN KERRY????

The Communist Party of The United States of America, CPUSA, is
publicly supporting the election of John Kerry.


Now why doesn't that surprise me? Kerry, our Hanoi hero that helped
defeat
his own country!

His war on terroism would be against his own countrymen just like before.
Anyone that loves this country and what it stands for would be in his
sights.

It may surprise you, then, to learn that the CPUSA doesn't "support
Kerry". Idiot.

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:P6Y5d.60405$wV.28161@attbi_s54...
The Communist Party has not endorsed any Candidate, but believes it is
important to elect Kerry and defeat Bush. From their web site: "The
CPUSA
is doing our utmost to help defeat Bush"

Does this matter, no! Kerry is a liberal, he is not a communist and he
can
not control what the CPUSA does.

The post was a troll, nothing more or nothing less.

It was a troll, yes...but it points out a very important truth about Kerry's
base. When a person makes the decision to oppose Bush and support Kerry, he
aligns himself with a group made up of homosexuals, degenerates, anarchists,
pagans, atheists, Communists, Socialists, elitists, terrorists, trial
lawyers...and, worst of all, the French. Remember, people are judged by the
company they keep.

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

It was a troll, yes...but it points out a very important truth about
Kerry's
base. When a person makes the decision to oppose Bush and support Kerry,
he
aligns himself with a group made up of homosexuals, degenerates,
anarchists,
pagans, atheists, Communists, Socialists, elitists, terrorists, trial
lawyers...and, worst of all, the French. Remember, people are judged by
the
company they keep.

Now THAT'S a troll, using a 57 foot long Rapala with a dozen sets of treble
hooks and a bunch of 20' Uncle Josh pork rinds. Not bad for a moron.

NOYB,
The vast majority of liberals do not support communist goals, anymore the
conservative support the ultra right wing groups (i.e. Neo Nazi's or
Abortion bombers).

American liberals do not come close to being or supporting Communism.


"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:P6Y5d.60405$wV.28161@attbi_s54...
The Communist Party has not endorsed any Candidate, but believes it is
important to elect Kerry and defeat Bush. From their web site: "The
CPUSA
is doing our utmost to help defeat Bush"

Does this matter, no! Kerry is a liberal, he is not a communist and he
can
not control what the CPUSA does.

The post was a troll, nothing more or nothing less.

It was a troll, yes...but it points out a very important truth about
Kerry's
base. When a person makes the decision to oppose Bush and support Kerry,
he
aligns himself with a group made up of homosexuals, degenerates,
anarchists,
pagans, atheists, Communists, Socialists, elitists, terrorists, trial
lawyers...and, worst of all, the French. Remember, people are judged by
the
company they keep.

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:wjZ5d.269580$mD.145327@attbi_s02...
NOYB,
The vast majority of liberals do not support communist goals, anymore the
conservative support the ultra right wing groups (i.e. Neo Nazi's or
Abortion bombers).

American liberals do not come close to being or supporting Communism.

You know how some peoples' respiratory systems close up if they eat peanuts
or shellfish? NOYB and his ilk have the same reaction when opening a
dictionary. Thus, they equate the words "liberal", "Communist" and
"socialist".

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:wjZ5d.269580$mD.145327@attbi_s02...
NOYB,
The vast majority of liberals do not support communist goals, anymore the
conservative support the ultra right wing groups (i.e. Neo Nazi's or
Abortion bombers).

American liberals do not come close to being or supporting Communism.

I didn't say they did. However, I did say that people are judged by the
company that they keep. Harry and his ilk choose to criticize all
conservatives for the fact that we plan to vote for the same guy who is
supported by fanatical right-wing groups that believe in shooting
abortionists. When a Democrat presses the computer voting screen button for
Kerry, he's pressing the same button that the world's immoral degenerates
are pressing.

NOYB wrote:
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:wjZ5d.269580$mD.145327@attbi_s02...
NOYB,
The vast majority of liberals do not support communist goals, anymore the
conservative support the ultra right wing groups (i.e. Neo Nazi's or
Abortion bombers).

American liberals do not come close to being or supporting Communism.

I didn't say they did. However, I did say that people are judged by the
company that they keep. Harry and his ilk choose to criticize all
conservatives for the fact that we plan to vote for the same guy who is
supported by fanatical right-wing groups that believe in shooting
abortionists. When a Democrat presses the computer voting screen button for
Kerry, he's pressing the same button that the world's immoral degenerates
are pressing.

Sorry, bub, but if you look around the world today, most of the immoral
degenerates are right-wingers, conservatives, folks like you and in some
cases no more extreme.

Virtually all the Muslim terrorists are right-wing conservatives.
Tim McVeigh was a right-wing terrorist.
Abortion clinic bombers are right-wing terrorists.
The haters who go after blacks and Jews in this country are right-wing
terrorists.
The self-proclaimed "militias" active in this country are right-wing
terrorists.


Immoral degenerates congregate on the right-hand side of the fence. Your
side.



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

You are correct about Harry, but it makes no more sense when you say it then
when Harry says it.

They both don't hold water. Suppose a murderer endorse Bush, would that
reflect badly on Republicans?




"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:wjZ5d.269580$mD.145327@attbi_s02...
NOYB,
The vast majority of liberals do not support communist goals, anymore the
conservative support the ultra right wing groups (i.e. Neo Nazi's or
Abortion bombers).

American liberals do not come close to being or supporting Communism.

I didn't say they did. However, I did say that people are judged by the
company that they keep. Harry and his ilk choose to criticize all
conservatives for the fact that we plan to vote for the same guy who is
supported by fanatical right-wing groups that believe in shooting
abortionists. When a Democrat presses the computer voting screen button
for
Kerry, he's pressing the same button that the world's immoral degenerates
are pressing.

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:%b06d.61013$wV.44977@attbi_s54...
You are correct about Harry, but it makes no more sense when you say it
then when Harry says it.

They both don't hold water. Suppose a murderer endorse Bush, would that
reflect badly on Republicans?

*One* murderer? No. An entire organization of murderers? Yes.

NYOB,
Let's agree to disagree on this one. ; )


"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:%b06d.61013$wV.44977@attbi_s54...
You are correct about Harry, but it makes no more sense when you say it
then when Harry says it.

They both don't hold water. Suppose a murderer endorse Bush, would that
reflect badly on Republicans?

*One* murderer? No. An entire organization of murderers? Yes.

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:%b06d.61013$wV.44977@attbi_s54...
You are correct about Harry, but it makes no more sense when you say it
then when Harry says it.

They both don't hold water. Suppose a murderer endorse Bush, would that
reflect badly on Republicans?

*One* murderer? No. An entire organization of murderers? Yes.



Hmmm. What makes an organization? How many? How about less than twenty,
including Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and the Joint Chiefs of Staff?

NOYB wrote:
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:%b06d.61013$wV.44977@attbi_s54...
You are correct about Harry, but it makes no more sense when you say it
then when Harry says it.

They both don't hold water. Suppose a murderer endorse Bush, would that
reflect badly on Republicans?

*One* murderer? No. An entire organization of murderers? Yes.



Ahhh...you're discussing the Bush Administration, right? Liars, thugs,
thieves and murderers, all of them.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

*I* am also encouraging people to defeat Bush. By your
perverted logic, that makes me a communist?

No, that makes you an asshole.

Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is evidence of
anger?

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
*I* am also encouraging people to defeat Bush. By your
perverted logic, that makes me a communist?

No, that makes you an asshole.

Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

It's evidence of someone who really doesn't want his nap disturbed - not for
many, many years.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:UXy6d.72301$wV.34778@attbi_s54...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.



Everything I repeat is exquisitely sane, not crazy.

Doug Kanter wrote:
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:UXy6d.72301$wV.34778@attbi_s54...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.



Everything I repeat is exquisitely sane, not crazy.


Taco Heaver hopes one day to be promoted to drive-by window hander-outer
at Taco Blech.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

grin, of course.


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:UXy6d.72301$wV.34778@attbi_s54...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.



Everything I repeat is exquisitely sane, not crazy.

ohh Harry for someone who says he has me filtered, you sure seem obsessed
about me.

Maybe you need a 12 step support group to help you .


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:UXy6d.72301$wV.34778@attbi_s54...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own
positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one
for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.



Everything I repeat is exquisitely sane, not crazy.


Taco Heaver hopes one day to be promoted to drive-by window hander-outer
at Taco Blech.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a
pariah.

What, me worry?

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.

The party who wrote to sftt.org complaining that the Fort Lewis bookstore only
displayed pro-Bush, anti-Kerry books was making an observation that can be
easily checked out by visiting the bookstore. Hackworth asked people to do just
exactly that, as well as other on-post bookstores.
It can easily be disproven if untrue- it's a representation of a situation that
can be investigated. It hardly qualifies as "crazy BS", even if it does
challenge you view that all is right or righteous in the Republican world.

Rush Limbaugh claims that "all liberals want is a free ride at public expense
and a country where we all bend over in Muslim prayer three times a day".
That's a claim that cannot be verified, or refuted- simply spread and repeated
by his many millions of not-so-bright, primarily conservative listeners.

I think you missed my point, he asks questions that are easily verified, but
he never follows up on any of his questions to say what is the truth. If
you only ask the question and don't write a report confirming or denying the
allegation, everyone is assumed guilty just by asking the question.

If Hack was really interested in knowing the truth, he would visit a few
bookstores and ask AAFES what books they do stock. He would also ask AAFES
to respond to the allegation before posting the email from an unidentified
army wife.

If he had a summary feedback on his questions, I could not find any on his
web site.




"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.

The party who wrote to sftt.org complaining that the Fort Lewis bookstore
only
displayed pro-Bush, anti-Kerry books was making an observation that can be
easily checked out by visiting the bookstore. Hackworth asked people to do
just
exactly that, as well as other on-post bookstores.
It can easily be disproven if untrue- it's a representation of a situation
that
can be investigated. It hardly qualifies as "crazy BS", even if it does
challenge you view that all is right or righteous in the Republican world.

Rush Limbaugh claims that "all liberals want is a free ride at public
expense
and a country where we all bend over in Muslim prayer three times a day".
That's a claim that cannot be verified, or refuted- simply spread and
repeated
by his many millions of not-so-bright, primarily conservative listeners.

"NOYB" wrote in message news:9fY5d.1749

When a person makes the decision to oppose Bush and support Kerry, he
aligns himself with a group made up of homosexuals, degenerates, anarchists,
pagans, atheists, Communists, Socialists, elitists, terrorists, trial
lawyers...and, worst of all, the French.

Apparently they all have more sense than you, though.