That is just plain sick! NAMLA people are the lowest scum of the world. They
should best be put behind bars for the rest of their lives.



Are they as low, almost as low, or lower than outright liars who post a link to
a website stating that an organization claims something it does not?

Looks like the "better educated" Republicans are getting desparate.

On 26 Sep 2004 16:23:32 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

That is just plain sick! NAMLA people are the lowest scum of the world. They
should best be put behind bars for the rest of their lives.



Are they as low, almost as low, or lower than outright liars who post a link to
a website stating that an organization claims something it does not?

Looks like the "better educated" Republicans are getting desparate.

A little searching on the net will make you realize this is a Rather like
hoax.

See the Rather like documents he

http://www.freepgs.com/counterpunch/nambla.htm

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
That is just plain sick! NAMLA people are the lowest scum of the world.
They
should best be put behind bars for the rest of their lives.

Are they as low, almost as low, or lower than outright liars who post a
link to
a website stating that an organization claims something it does not?

Looks like the "better educated" Republicans are getting desparate.

grin, Gould, it looks like you are getting desperate, this post was nothing
but a troll and you instinctually grabbed swallowed it whole because it
allowed you to portray those you disagree with in a bad light.

I guess this is an example of the "better educated" Democrats at work.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...A%40teran ews



..

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:19:43 GMT, "Taco Heaven"
wrote:


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
That is just plain sick! NAMLA people are the lowest scum of the world.
They
should best be put behind bars for the rest of their lives.

Are they as low, almost as low, or lower than outright liars who post a
link to
a website stating that an organization claims something it does not?

Looks like the "better educated" Republicans are getting desparate.

grin, Gould, it looks like you are getting desperate, this post was nothing
but a troll and you instinctually grabbed swallowed it whole because it
allowed you to portray those you disagree with in a bad light.

I guess this is an example of the "better educated" Democrats at work.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...A%40teran ews



I posted the link to the website showing the document the story is founded
on. The document is there for everyone to see. Several anonymous sources
have verified that it is indeed a copy of a real document.

So what if the contents may be questionable, no one has yet to come out with
proof that they don't support Kerry.

Rather good reasoning!

A boater,

The truth of the matter is it doesn't matter who they are endorsing. The
candidate cannot refuse to accept their endorsement, and there endorsement
does not mean they agree with any of their positions.

Publishing their endorsement is someone trying to embarrass Kerry, Gould
jumping on the person who posted it in here as am "educated Republicans)
was Gould trying to embarrass those who support Bush.

Neither one is effective.


"A boater" A wrote in message
...
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:19:43 GMT, "Taco Heaven"
wrote:


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
That is just plain sick! NAMLA people are the lowest scum of the world.
They
should best be put behind bars for the rest of their lives.

Are they as low, almost as low, or lower than outright liars who post a
link to
a website stating that an organization claims something it does not?

Looks like the "better educated" Republicans are getting desparate.

grin, Gould, it looks like you are getting desperate, this post was
nothing
but a troll and you instinctually grabbed swallowed it whole because it
allowed you to portray those you disagree with in a bad light.

I guess this is an example of the "better educated" Democrats at work.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...A%40teran ews



I posted the link to the website showing the document the story is founded
on. The document is there for everyone to see. Several anonymous sources
have verified that it is indeed a copy of a real document.

So what if the contents may be questionable, no one has yet to come out
with
proof that they don't support Kerry.

Rather good reasoning!

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 23:03:23 GMT, "Taco Heaven"
wrote:

A boater,

The truth of the matter is it doesn't matter who they are endorsing. The
candidate cannot refuse to accept their endorsement, and there endorsement
does not mean they agree with any of their positions.

Publishing their endorsement is someone trying to embarrass Kerry, Gould
jumping on the person who posted it in here as am "educated Republicans)
was Gould trying to embarrass those who support Bush.

Neither one is effective.

I agree, just yanking on the anchor rode a bit.

People who post crap like "NAMBLA supports John Kerry on its web page"
rather
obviously hate the truth.

Do you think they'd support Bush?



They apparently don't support Kerry.