Gould 0738 wrote:
I am not suggesting there are any plans for a draft, but NOYB has
suggested attacks on Syria and Iran.

If NOYB's fantasy comes to fruition and we expand this war, he may be among the
first to go!

From the Selective Service website, "Strategic Goals for 2004"

Strategic Objective 1.1: Within current legislative guidance, enhance the
Agency’s ability
to respond flexibly to a DoD request for health care personnel using the
Agency’s HCPDS.

**********
Strategic Objective 1.2: Ensure a mobilization infrastructure of 56 State
Headquarters,
442 Area Offices and 1,980 Local Boards are operational within 75 days of an
authorized
return to conscription.

*********************
Strategic Objective 1.3: Be operationally ready to furnish untrained manpower
within DoD
timelines.

************

Strategic Objective 1.4: Support the Agency’s ability to provide manpower to
the DoD with the development and implementation of updated readiness training
programs.

*************

Strategic Objective 2.1: Improve registration compliance rates.

********

Strategic Objective 2.2: Improve the participation rate in the SSS’ High
School (HS) Registrar Program which is composed of individuals who have agreed
to act as uncompensated Registrars in high schools nationally.

*************

Strategic Objective 2.3: Seek alternative registration methods

*************
Strategic Objective 4.1: Ensure a mobilization infrastructure of 48 Alternative
Service Offices and 48 Civilian Review Boards are operational within 96 days
after notification of a return to induction.

***********


Sure sounds like a draft is the farthest thing from the government's mind.


A funny thing occurs to me. The Limbaugh fans who squeal, "Don't let them
register our guns! They might come and take them away!" have no difficulty at
all registering their sons, and soon their daughters for that *exact* purpose.





I'm planning to send in the particulars of several warmongers here, to
the government agency that can best use the information.*






* Not really...but it would be a gas, eh? Imagine the military
conscriptors showing up at a certain house on Nantucket Drive in a
suburb of Cleveland, and taking "jeff," the fellow a poster here once
claimed was his "son" using his account to do exactly what the dad does...



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I am not suggesting there are any plans for a draft, but NOYB has
suggested attacks on Syria and Iran.

If NOYB's fantasy comes to fruition and we expand this war, he may be
among the
first to go!


If NOYB's fantasy comes to fruition, we'd use nukes on Iran before they use
them on us.

Gould,

You have been all concerned about the republicans keeping the proposed draft
secret till after the elections.

If you have any problems with the draft you need to contact the following
representative:

The following representative introduced the legislation: Mr. RANGEL Dem.
from NY, Mr. MCDERMOTT Dem from Washington State, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. LEWIS
Dem of Georgia, Mr. STARK Dem from California, and Mr. ABERCROMBIE Dem. from
Hawaii, introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Armed Services.

The bill to reinstate the draft was introduced by democrats as a way to make
sure the privilege have to serve in the armed forces.

I guess the White House and Republicans are not responsible after all.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I am not suggesting there are any plans for a draft, but NOYB has
suggested attacks on Syria and Iran.

If NOYB's fantasy comes to fruition and we expand this war, he may be
among the
first to go!

From the Selective Service website, "Strategic Goals for 2004"

Strategic Objective 1.1: Within current legislative guidance, enhance the
Agency's ability
to respond flexibly to a DoD request for health care personnel using the
Agency's HCPDS.

**********
Strategic Objective 1.2: Ensure a mobilization infrastructure of 56 State
Headquarters,
442 Area Offices and 1,980 Local Boards are operational within 75 days of
an
authorized
return to conscription.

*********************
Strategic Objective 1.3: Be operationally ready to furnish untrained
manpower
within DoD
timelines.

************

Strategic Objective 1.4: Support the Agency's ability to provide manpower
to
the DoD with the development and implementation of updated readiness
training
programs.

*************

Strategic Objective 2.1: Improve registration compliance rates.

********

Strategic Objective 2.2: Improve the participation rate in the SSS' High
School (HS) Registrar Program which is composed of individuals who have
agreed
to act as uncompensated Registrars in high schools nationally.

*************

Strategic Objective 2.3: Seek alternative registration methods

*************
Strategic Objective 4.1: Ensure a mobilization infrastructure of 48
Alternative
Service Offices and 48 Civilian Review Boards are operational within 96
days
after notification of a return to induction.

***********


Sure sounds like a draft is the farthest thing from the government's mind.


A funny thing occurs to me. The Limbaugh fans who squeal, "Don't let them
register our guns! They might come and take them away!" have no difficulty
at
all registering their sons, and soon their daughters for that *exact*
purpose.

Gould,

You have been all concerned about the republicans keeping the proposed draft
secret till after the elections.

Taco, not so.

I have simply posted items from the Selective Service website stating that the
2004 goal is to be prepared to furnish XXXXX troops withing XXXXX time
"following the authorization to resume conscription.

If the Republicans wanted to keep this plan a secret, they wouldn't post it on
the internet, would they???

With any luck, the Repubs won't have much to say about whether there's a draft,
or not, after the election. :-)

Time to derail the New American Century disaster plan. Time for a change. We'll
have to see how courageous, or scared, the electorate is in a few weeks.

Gould,
Do you disagree that the party you support wants the draft reinstated?


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,

You have been all concerned about the republicans keeping the proposed
draft
secret till after the elections.

Taco, not so.

I have simply posted items from the Selective Service website stating that
the
2004 goal is to be prepared to furnish XXXXX troops withing XXXXX time
"following the authorization to resume conscription.

If the Republicans wanted to keep this plan a secret, they wouldn't post
it on
the internet, would they???

With any luck, the Repubs won't have much to say about whether there's a
draft,
or not, after the election. :-)

Time to derail the New American Century disaster plan. Time for a change.
We'll
have to see how courageous, or scared, the electorate is in a few weeks.

Gould,
Do you disagree that the party you support wants the draft reinstated?

I don't support any political party.
My choice for POTUS this year will be a Democrat. I am seriously debating
between the Demo and the Repub candidate in the Wash State Gov. election- she's
more liberal and more tuned in to some of my concerns, but he might be a better
administrator. Unlike the POTUS race, the Republican candidate hasn't already
proven to be inept.

I vote for the man, not the party. Next time you right wingers run a qualified
candidate, I will carefully compare with other choices and perhaps support him
or her for the office.

There are plans for a draft, but the Bush-****ters won't dare admit it
until after the elections.



Some folks who are reluctant to register their guns, for fear the government
might take them away, are eager to register their kids for that *exact*
purpose. Go figure.

Gould 0738 wrote:
There are plans for a draft, but the Bush-****ters won't dare admit it
until after the elections.



Some folks who are reluctant to register their guns, for fear the government
might take them away, are eager to register their kids for that *exact*
purpose. Go figure.


Easy...they are only "right to life" when it concerns a fetus.


--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

Gould,

You have been all concerned about the republicans keeping the proposed draft
secret till after the elections.

If you have any problems with the draft you need to contact the following
representative:

The following representative introduced the legislation: Mr. RANGEL Dem.
from NY, Mr. MCDERMOTT Dem from Washington State, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. LEWIS
Dem of Georgia, Mr. STARK Dem from California, and Mr. ABERCROMBIE Dem. from
Hawaii, introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Armed Services.

The bill to reinstate the draft was introduced by democrats as a way to make
sure the privilege have to serve in the armed forces.

I guess the White House and Republicans are not responsible after all.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
There are plans for a draft, but the Bush-****ters won't dare admit it
until after the elections.



Some folks who are reluctant to register their guns, for fear the
government
might take them away, are eager to register their kids for that *exact*
purpose. Go figure.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
It's not my role to defend the site. Check it out and draw your own
conclusion,
but don't blindly accept Bush Limbaugh's spin on the matter.

Why do you think I listen to Rush or any talk radio? I don't and haven't
listen to Rush in over 5 years. When I did I listened to it to hear his
outrageous statements and his twisted logic.

I guess if someone disagrees with you, they must listen to Rush.