(ecr) wrote in message om...
(Gould 0738) wrote in message ...
Fly on wall of WH staff room hears:

Gould,

You have no clue as to Bush's service.
Have you not seen the reports as to the requirements for guard
service?

The requirements for NG service were 50 points per year.

Bush had;

1st yr: 340
2nd yr: 253
3rd yr: 112
4th yr: 137
5th yr: 56
6th yr: 56

Result; HONORABLE DISCHARGE


Source: http://www.hillnews.com/york/090904.aspx

I know, it is a conservative site so it must be discounted by such as
yourself and hairy and asskisser.

Grow up.

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:37:03 -0400, jim-- wrote:


I-0W. Conscientous objector. Draft number came up, did two years
alternative
service.

Translation: He who enjoys the freedoms other have fought for but will
not do the same when asked.

I figured as much Chuck.


Like religious freedom? So, when push comes to shove, which allegiance is
more important, to God *or* to country?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:37:03 -0400, jim-- wrote:


I-0W. Conscientous objector. Draft number came up, did two years
alternative
service.

Translation: He who enjoys the freedoms other have fought for but will
not do the same when asked.

I figured as much Chuck.


Like religious freedom? So, when push comes to shove, which allegiance
is
more important, to God *or* to country?


Uh-oh...Jayne gave the keyboard back to Jim--wit?

A teling post...

For someone who has killfiled me you seem to maintain a keen interest in my
life and my posts.

But such should be expected from a Kerry supported....flip.....flop.

Like religious freedom? So, when push comes to shove, which allegiance is
more important, to God *or* to country?

I did exactly what my country asked me to do. I had a couple of easy outs,
including
a group of anti-war people in Vancouver BC offering me a job in a cabinet shop
and the right connections to become a "landed immigrant". It was allegiance to
my country that inspired me to stay here, work within the system, etc.

I'm sure it would have been much more herioc to go AWOL from the National
Guard, attend college darned near forever,
or what not.

But the documents weren't wrong; they were just forgeries. There is no
dispute about Bush being A.W.O.L. at best, but probably a deserter, or
at least that's what they would have called me if I had been "dropped
from the rolls" over 30 days like he was. But then, my daddy wasn't the
prez, either...

Capt. Jeff

But the documents weren't wrong; they were just forgeries. There is no
dispute about Bush being A.W.O.L.

OJ is innocent.

Has to be. Just ask the right wingers.

Since part of the evidence against him was proven to be fabricated, (Mark
Fuhrman, glove, etc) that means the entire case was bogus from the get-go.

Since the presence of a forged document to the contrary proves that Bush *must*
have served honorably in the TANG, rather obviously OJ is innocent too.

Surely the same standard applies.

"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
But the documents weren't wrong; they were just forgeries.

LOL. Thanks. That put a smile on my face. ;-)

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
But the documents weren't wrong; they were just forgeries. There is no
dispute about Bush being A.W.O.L.

OJ is innocent.

Has to be. Just ask the right wingers.

Since part of the evidence against him was proven to be fabricated, (Mark
Fuhrman, glove, etc) that means the entire case was bogus from the get-go.

You just argued yesterday that the Constitution protects against abusive
powers by the police...and that criminals whose rights are violated
shouldn't be prosecuted. Now you're telling me that OJ was really guilty?




Since the presence of a forged document to the contrary proves that Bush
*must*
have served honorably in the TANG, rather obviously OJ is innocent too.

I'm glad we agree!

" jim--" wrote in message ...
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Chuck, how long were you in the military?

I-0W. Conscientous objector. Draft number came up, did two years
alternative
service.

Translation: He who enjoys the freedoms other have fought for but will not
do the same when asked.

I figured as much Chuck.

So, Jim, What exactly were the freedoms we were fighting for in
Vietnam? What was the purpose of that war?

Sam wrote:
" jim--" wrote in message ...
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Chuck, how long were you in the military?

I-0W. Conscientous objector. Draft number came up, did two years
alternative
service.

Translation: He who enjoys the freedoms other have fought for but will not
do the same when asked.

I figured as much Chuck.

So, Jim, What exactly were the freedoms we were fighting for in
Vietnam? What was the purpose of that war?


We were there to make sure the North Vietnamese didn't invade Avon Lake,
Ohio.



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?