Get over the fact that precedence has been set. Plus, BJC is still out
there trying to keep control of the DNC.

"Jim" wrote in message
ink.net...
The mark of a conservative. There is no argument that does not have
Bill Clinton as a response.

He's not the president anymore, get over it.

WaIIy wrote:

On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 04:30:00 GMT, Jim wrote:


Spending MY money on THEIR reelection photos is not a silly persnickety
issue.


Right on, Jim. Just like that time your hero made a cross out of rocks
on the beach at Normandy.
Problem was, since there are no rocks on that beach, they had to import
them.

LOL

Idiot

"Jim" wrote in message
ink.net...

Spending MY money on THEIR reelection photos is not a silly persnickety
issue.

Been done since the camera was invented.


Starting a war is not a silly persnickety issue.
The policy of starting "preemptive" wars is not a silly persnickety issue.
Lying about the reasons for starting a preemptive war is not a silly
persnickety issue.

All one issue. Spoken 3 ways.

There is nothing involved with a complete disregard for history in
foreign policy that is a silly persnickety issue.

Same issue - 4th incarnation.


OK?

If Bush actually gets elected in 2004, "it'll be people like you that
do it." Not people like me.

Jim


Clams Canino wrote:

This is *exactly* why if the Dems lose in 2004 it'll be people like you
that
do it. I've already heard people musing about how the party seems to
have
an "angry" overtone. Cod knows there's enough real issues to get on
about?
Or is yours becoming the party of the silly persnickity issues? I hope
not.

-W

"Jim" wrote in message
ink.net...

It was a fake dinner. Same thing. I didn't make anything up, if it
wasn't real, it was a fake.

Same with the table decoration.

Clams Canino wrote:

It wasn't a fake turkey. It was the display centerpiece bird. Actually,

the

correct one to hold for a photo-op. Unless of course, you *prefer* he

hold

up a hotel-pan full of pre-sliced turkey and gravy for the cameras -

LOL!

Now if he tried to actually CUT the display bird - that would be funny

as

hell.

But it wasn't a fake bird.

I think our Prez has enough "exposure" without having to make some up?

-W





"Jim" wrote in message news:xnPAb.4909



It would be interesting to know whether Bush was supposed to hold up
that turkey platter.

It's possible he was to hold up that platter for the camera, that's
exactly what he did. How could that possibly be the wrong thing to
do?
Symbolism, fake turkey being held by a.... let's just say the
symbolism
is what's wrong here.

Since Bill was the last President, who better to compare apples to apples?

Photo-ops are photo ops. If that's your "issue" - I'd be nervous.

-W

"Jim" wrote in message
ink.net...
The mark of a conservative. There is no argument that does not have
Bill Clinton as a response.

He's not the president anymore, get over it.

WaIIy wrote:

On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 04:30:00 GMT, Jim wrote:


Spending MY money on THEIR reelection photos is not a silly persnickety
issue.


Right on, Jim. Just like that time your hero made a cross out of rocks
on the beach at Normandy.
Problem was, since there are no rocks on that beach, they had to import
them.

LOL

Idiot

Wally wrote:

You're national candidates are reduced to saying the "F" word in
interviews with the "Y" generation. LOL

Perhaps you should consider sticking to the "f" word, yourself. It is a single
syllable, four-letter word and users are unlikely to be embarrassed as much by
incorrect, (rather than merely inapproprate) usage.

No charge for today's English lesson:

YOUR is a possessive pronoun. It is the proper form to use when stating, "One
of your national candidates used an F word in an interview with Rolling Stone
Magazine."

YOU'RE is a contracted form of "You are."
(Notice the apostrophe. First clue).
It is the proper form to use when stating
"As usual, you're concentrating on the petty details, (yet fail to understand
the
broader abstract concept)."



http://www.tomorrowsbestseller.com/w...State/book.asp