"basskisser" wrote in message

Oh, I know full the the differences. BUT, unlike YOU, I also know
there is a direct correlations between the two.

Oh. OK. That explains why, when Clinton left office there was no debt. Is
that right?

"JohnH" wrote in message

So if there was no deficit, then there was no debt?

Of course, since there's a direct correlations between the two. If one is
zero, the other has to be zero. That's what correlations means.

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

" jim--" wrote in message news:NPWdnVW5Is2Wj9_cRVn-

And Hillary's. :-)

maybe they found a trunkful of cash right under the Rose billing records.

Did they find those things yet? Maybe they burned up in the same Armory
fire that destroyed Bush's records!

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"JohnH" wrote in message

So if there was no deficit, then there was no debt?

Of course, since there's a direct correlations between the two. If one is
zero, the other has to be zero. That's what correlations means.

Are you REALLY that stupid???

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message


And, of course, in your crippled mind, there is no connection between
running a deficit and piling up the debt.

No, I didn't say that. But B'ass uses the terms interchangeably, and shows
no comprehension of the difference.

Please show where I've "used the terms interchangeably". You can't
because I haven't.

"basskisser" wrote in message

Are you REALLY that stupid???

Oh, you bet!!! I just mounted on my wall a framed certificate upon which
are printed the words

"There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced
budget."

That's *exactly* how stupid I am.

LOL

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message

Are you REALLY that stupid???

Oh, you bet!!! I just mounted on my wall a framed certificate upon which
are printed the words

"There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced
budget."

That's *exactly* how stupid I am.

LOL

Is it right next to those childish LOL's? And, is it also next to the
allegation that you made, that said that I used the "terms
interchangably"? Did you happen to find the evidence of that? LOL?

"basskisser" wrote in message

Is it right next to those childish LOL's? And, is it also next to the
allegation that you made, that said that I used the "terms
interchangably"? Did you happen to find the evidence of that? LOL?

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message

Is it right next to those childish LOL's? And, is it also next to the
allegation that you made, that said that I used the "terms
interchangably"? Did you happen to find the evidence of that? LOL?

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

Good, we're getting somewhere. Now, please post where I've used dthe
"terms interchangably". Maybe, then, I'LL laugh until your ass falls
off.

"basskisser" wrote in message

Good, we're getting somewhere. Now, please post where I've used dthe
"terms interchangably". Maybe, then, I'LL laugh until your ass falls
off.


OK.....


On 9 Sep 2004 06:52:53 -0700, (basskisser) [that's
you]wrote:

"There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced
budget."

OK. Start laughing. I'll let you know when my ass falls off.