| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:56:14 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: John Gaquin wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message On 9 Sep 2004 06:52:53 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced budget. At 09/30/1999, the national debt was $5,656,270,901,615.43. Did Clinton pay it off in three months? I think not. We've seen this several times before. B'ass can't quite grasp the difference between the deficit and the national debt. It's fun, though. And, of course, in your crippled mind, there is no connection between running a deficit and piling up the debt. *Whose* crippled mind? Do you know where this came from? _______________________________________ On 9 Sep 2004 06:52:53 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced budget. Did bassie really say that there was no *debt*? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT Bush is certainly no Reagan | General | |||
| OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
| O.T. A day at the airport. | General | |||
| Can We STOP IT??? | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
