Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JohnH" wrote in message On 9 Sep 2004 06:52:53 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced budget. At 09/30/1999, the national debt was $5,656,270,901,615.43. Did Clinton pay it off in three months? I think not. We've seen this several times before. B'ass can't quite grasp the difference between the deficit and the national debt. It's fun, though. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Gaquin wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message On 9 Sep 2004 06:52:53 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced budget. At 09/30/1999, the national debt was $5,656,270,901,615.43. Did Clinton pay it off in three months? I think not. We've seen this several times before. B'ass can't quite grasp the difference between the deficit and the national debt. It's fun, though. And, of course, in your crippled mind, there is no connection between running a deficit and piling up the debt. -- Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal! And don't forget to pay your taxes so the rich don't have to! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message And, of course, in your crippled mind, there is no connection between running a deficit and piling up the debt. No, I didn't say that. But B'ass uses the terms interchangeably, and shows no comprehension of the difference. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message And, of course, in your crippled mind, there is no connection between running a deficit and piling up the debt. No, I didn't say that. But B'ass uses the terms interchangeably, and shows no comprehension of the difference. Please show where I've "used the terms interchangeably". You can't because I haven't. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"JohnH" wrote in message On 9 Sep 2004 06:52:53 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced budget. At 09/30/1999, the national debt was $5,656,270,901,615.43. Did Clinton pay it off in three months? I think not. We've seen this several times before. B'ass can't quite grasp the difference between the deficit and the national debt. It's fun, though. Oh, I know full the the differences. BUT, unlike YOU, I also know there is a direct correlations between the two. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "basskisser" wrote in message Oh, I know full the the differences. BUT, unlike YOU, I also know there is a direct correlations between the two. Help....My eye's are burning!!!!!!!!!!! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "basskisser" wrote in message Oh, I know full the the differences. BUT, unlike YOU, I also know there is a direct correlations between the two. Oh. OK. That explains why, when Clinton left office there was no debt. Is that right? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bush is certainly no Reagan | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
O.T. A day at the airport. | General | |||
Can We STOP IT??? | ASA |