Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are tons of old boats around with large (over 100hp) old 2 strokes
that are no longer worth the trouble especially with labor, parts and fuel costs. If you are mechanically inclined and the boat is free, that could be another story and a hobbyist's dream. For most though it will be a "nightmare". PS: They might make a good mooring? -- Bill Kiene |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is either a troll, or the most inane comment I've seen today.
There is though, an active conspiricy amongst the dealers to get these things off the water. This includes inflated labor rates, inflated parts costs, and poorly trained service personell who don't know how to work on them properly. Since they are so simple to work on... I surely wouldn't take a newer, more complex, outboard to any shop that couldn't properly troubleshoot or tune up a 1980 140hp Merc. -W "Bill Kiene" wrote in message m... There are tons of old boats around with large (over 100hp) old 2 strokes that are no longer worth the trouble especially with labor, parts and fuel costs. If you are mechanically inclined and the boat is free, that could be another story and a hobbyist's dream. For most though it will be a "nightmare". PS: They might make a good mooring? -- Bill Kiene |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is either a troll, or the most inane comment I've seen today.
You tell 'em Clams ![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Clams Canino" wrote in message hlink.net...
This is either a troll, or the most inane comment I've seen today. There is though, an active conspiricy amongst the dealers to get these things off the water. This includes inflated labor rates, inflated parts costs, and poorly trained service personell who don't know how to work on them properly. Since they are so simple to work on... I surely wouldn't take a newer, more complex, outboard to any shop that couldn't properly troubleshoot or tune up a 1980 140hp Merc. Clams, I agree its BS. Aside from that, large 2 strokes have 200+ HP not 100+ HP ![]() Matt |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there is a place for 2 strokes and a place for 4 strokes. If you are
really interested in running an appreciable portion of WOT all the time you need a 2 stroke. If you are content to cruise at 3000-3500 RPM a 4 stroke is probably for you. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there is a place for 2 strokes and a place for 4 strokes.
Yes, and if there were some decent mechanics around here that would actually get your boat back to you before the end of NEXT season a new 4 stroke would be nice. If you didnt need 4 million dollars worth of diagnostic equipment to fix one, a new four stroke would be nice. I'll give up my old 2 stroke when they pry my cold, dead fingers off the throttle. Hmmm, that sounds familiar. ![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Today they do.... but I think he meant "large" as in 100 and **up**.
It take a minimum of about 90hp at the propshaft to propel your "average" family runnabout and be able to use it for fishing / skiing / tubing etc. Granted, tournament bass boats need a bit more corn to be competative. Two stroke outboards broke "the 100 hp barrier" in 1962 with the Merc 1000 that was featured in popular mechanics magazine. A quick flurry of improvements saw the "Tower of Power" go to 110, 125, 135, 140, and 150hp over the next 10 years. Between 1962 and 1988 Mercury made hundreds of thousands of these critters, each *still* quite capable of powering a brand new runnabout. -W (who has new Seaswirl runnabout with about 50 hours on the hull, powered by a 16 year old Tower. Order it "Mercury pre-rig please!" and go find your own Tower hehe ) "Matt Lang" wrote in message I agree its BS. Aside from that, large 2 strokes have 200+ HP not 100+ HP ![]() Matt |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to be the owner of a '68 Merc 1250 ... a nice machine.. back
then it was THE ****kicker motor Matt "Clams Canino" wrote in message hlink.net... Today they do.... but I think he meant "large" as in 100 and **up**. It take a minimum of about 90hp at the propshaft to propel your "average" family runnabout and be able to use it for fishing / skiing / tubing etc. Granted, tournament bass boats need a bit more corn to be competative. Two stroke outboards broke "the 100 hp barrier" in 1962 with the Merc 1000 that was featured in popular mechanics magazine. A quick flurry of improvements saw the "Tower of Power" go to 110, 125, 135, 140, and 150hp over the next 10 years. Between 1962 and 1988 Mercury made hundreds of thousands of these critters, each *still* quite capable of powering a brand new runnabout. -W (who has new Seaswirl runnabout with about 50 hours on the hull, powered by a 16 year old Tower. Order it "Mercury pre-rig please!" and go find your own Tower hehe ) "Matt Lang" wrote in message I agree its BS. Aside from that, large 2 strokes have 200+ HP not 100+ HP ![]() Matt |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ya, that was the 1st 99ci block, and they grew up fast.....
1350 in 1970, 1400 in 1972, 1500 by 1973. For a time there in the 70's all those beasts were the kings of the lake..... 1500's still win the top NMMA titles in the "under 100ci classes" , they're done screaming when we say they're done screaming. ![]() There's a '68 1250 near me that's powering an 80's vintage family ski-boat, seems to be doing just fine out there. -W "Matt Lang" wrote in message om... I used to be the owner of a '68 Merc 1250 ... a nice machine.. back then it was THE ****kicker motor Matt |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also Sprach Bill Kiene :
There are tons of old boats around with large (over 100hp) old 2 strokes that are no longer worth the trouble especially with labor, parts and fuel costs. Feh. My 140 HP Johnson is almost as old as I am, and has been 100% relible in the 5 years I've owned it. Parts, if needed, are far cheaper than a brand new 4-stroke or DFI 2 stroke. For one thing, there are far fewer parts to begin with. Also, since it's been around forever, there are plenty of aftermarket manufacturers to buy parts from, while with a brand new engine you have no choice other than the manufacterer's parts. An example, I replaced the water pump earlier this season. It cost me $39.95 for a complete kit, new impeller, gaskets, housing and liner. Anyone want to look up what it costs for a 2004 4-stroke of similar size? The fuel cost argument is a non-starter. A few extra gallons a year is FAR cheaper than spending 15,000 plus installation costs to repower. Dan -- JESUS SAVES, but I makes backups! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Fuel Injection 4 strokes from Yamaha for 2005 | General | |||
Ray Jefferson "Deep Flasher" | Electronics | |||
Ray Jefferson "Deep Flasher" | Cruising | |||
Ray Jefferson "Deep Flasher" | UK Power Boats |