The terrorists have little to fear when we are
distracting ourselves by making war on organized armed forces that have never
attacked us, and are not credible threats in the future.


PS: The PNAC strategies were conceived with the concept of defending the US
against terrorism as a secondary, rather than primary priority. The military
adventures recommended by PNAC are not well advised when defending the US
against terrorism must now be our highest strategic priority. Bush is
surrounded by the authors of the PNAC doctrine- Cheney, Wolfowitz, etc etc etc.
All of his advisors are giving him biased and ultimately ineffective advice.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
The terrorists have little to fear when we are
distracting ourselves by making war on organized armed forces that have
never
attacked us, and are not credible threats in the future.


PS: The PNAC strategies were conceived with the concept of defending the
US
against terrorism as a secondary, rather than primary priority.

Wrong. Ridding the World of terrorism was one of the benefits predicted in
the Pax Americana vision for the future.

Wrong. Ridding the World of terrorism was one of the benefits predicted in
the Pax Americana vision for the future.

"Secondary"

Look it up. :-)