Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net...
Clarke admitted that he *alone* approved the flights. Why would he protect the Bush administration after his scathing attack book against Bush? Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Clarke admitted that he *alone* approved the flights. Why would he protect the Bush administration after his scathing attack book against Bush? Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. And for that exact reason, Clarke should be indicted for perjury. He contradicted himself when he admitted in May of this year that he alone, in consultation with the FBI, granted permission. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Clarke admitted that he *alone* approved the flights. Why would he protect the Bush administration after his scathing attack book against Bush? Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. And for that exact reason, Clarke should be indicted for perjury. He contradicted himself when he admitted in May of this year that he alone, in consultation with the FBI, granted permission. Nope, you're wrong. Sorry. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! | ASA | |||
( OT) uncovering the truth about 9/11 has never been Bush's intention | General | |||
( OT ) Bush's 9/11 coverup? | General |