Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melandre wrote in message . ..
Looking at buying my first boat and don't know much about boating unfortunately. Narrowed it down to 2 options: both are Bayliner approx. 18' (either Capri 1750 or 1850 not sure) but one has an in outboard (Force 120hp I think) and the other has an Inboard (120hp or 135hp can"t remember exactly). The boat would be moored for a large portion of the year at a sal****er marina (in North Vancouver, BC). I am wondering if one type (O/B vs I/B) is considered a better solution for sal****er. For example, with an I/B the option of not having the leg in the water doesn"t exist while with an O/B I suppose one could choose to raise the motor above water level (not sure if this is wise or if the air/sal****er mix would create more damage than simply leaving it in the water). Any thoughts, advises, recommendations? Mooring in sal****er is about as punishing as i gets for a boat... you want to make sure you have all the corrosion prevention in place ... zincs ... mercathode... galvanic seperator (if running shorepower to the boat) .. Otherwise corrosion will destroy your drive... even stray currant from ohter boats can be punishing ... With such a small boat I recommend trailiring it (like oters here).. also 120 HP seems like there may be a (not enough) power issue waiting for you ... Lastly .. there are probably good reasons for FORCE engines being not manufactured anymore ![]() Matt |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I understand it Force is a "modern" Chrysler whom Brunswick purchased.
"Clams Canino" wrote in message nk.net... In my opinion Force is Brunswick, Mercury is Brunswick, but a Force is NOT a Mercury. (Mariner however IS Mercury) -W "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:26:41 GMT, Melandre wrote: Looking at buying my first boat and don't know much about boating unfortunately. Narrowed it down to 2 options: both are Bayliner approx. 18' (either Capri 1750 or 1850 not sure) but one has an in outboard (Force 120hp I think) and the other has an Inboard (120hp or 135hp can"t remember exactly). The boat would be moored for a large portion of the year at a sal****er marina (in North Vancouver, BC). I am wondering if one type (O/B vs I/B) is considered a better solution for sal****er. For example, with an I/B the option of not having the leg in the water doesn"t exist while with an O/B I suppose one could choose to raise the motor above water level (not sure if this is wise or if the air/sal****er mix would create more damage than simply leaving it in the water). Any thoughts, advises, recommendations? I assume these are used boats that you are considering. First, I would not purchase the 'Liner with the Force. I'm fairly sure that motor is on it's last legs. In any case, it's older and while it's still a "Mercury", parts are problematic - in particular of that vintage. I assume the other boat is an I/O and of the same vintage as the original boat. This may or may not be a good buy. I would certainly have a competant mechanic look it over and give you an opinion. As to mooring, these are a little small for a mooring - I would think you would be better served trailering the boat - cheaper too. I an strictly an outboard guy - I have three of the freakin' things on two boats and wouldn't have it any other way. If I were to move to a cabin boat, it would be something that I can hang an outboard or outboards off of. Outboards generally have more interior room than an I/O, but that's not always true. With respect to maintainence in salt water, it's better on a boat that size to trailer. That way you can flush the motor, wash things down and it helps the engines last longer. With respect to I/O, it's better to get a Fresh Water Cooled (FWC) motor than Raw Water Cooled (RWC) for obvioius reasons. As a general piece of advice for a new boat owner, find somebody who knows boats to check these out for you or pay a compentant outboard/inboard mechanic to check out the boats. LOOK AT A LOT OF BOATS!!! Don't settle for anything - the more you look at, the more guestions you ask, the more you learn and when you do buy, you will be more confident in your first boat purchase. At this time in history, used boats are plentiful. Check boattraderonline.com, boats.com, the used listings in your area and just go and look - get a feel for pricing, ages, types. Check out marina listings, go to in-water boat shows - get a firm idea of what it is you want and need. Good luck. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ----------- "Angling may be said to be so like the mathematics that it can never be fully learnt..." Izaak Walton "The Compleat Angler", 1653 |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ding!
-W "habbi" wrote in message ... As I understand it Force is a "modern" Chrysler whom Brunswick purchased. "Clams Canino" wrote in message nk.net... In my opinion Force is Brunswick, Mercury is Brunswick, but a Force is NOT a Mercury. (Mariner however IS Mercury) -W "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:26:41 GMT, Melandre wrote: Looking at buying my first boat and don't know much about boating unfortunately. Narrowed it down to 2 options: both are Bayliner approx. 18' (either Capri 1750 or 1850 not sure) but one has an in outboard (Force 120hp I think) and the other has an Inboard (120hp or 135hp can"t remember exactly). The boat would be moored for a large portion of the year at a sal****er marina (in North Vancouver, BC). I am wondering if one type (O/B vs I/B) is considered a better solution for sal****er. For example, with an I/B the option of not having the leg in the water doesn"t exist while with an O/B I suppose one could choose to raise the motor above water level (not sure if this is wise or if the air/sal****er mix would create more damage than simply leaving it in the water). Any thoughts, advises, recommendations? I assume these are used boats that you are considering. First, I would not purchase the 'Liner with the Force. I'm fairly sure that motor is on it's last legs. In any case, it's older and while it's still a "Mercury", parts are problematic - in particular of that vintage. I assume the other boat is an I/O and of the same vintage as the original boat. This may or may not be a good buy. I would certainly have a competant mechanic look it over and give you an opinion. As to mooring, these are a little small for a mooring - I would think you would be better served trailering the boat - cheaper too. I an strictly an outboard guy - I have three of the freakin' things on two boats and wouldn't have it any other way. If I were to move to a cabin boat, it would be something that I can hang an outboard or outboards off of. Outboards generally have more interior room than an I/O, but that's not always true. With respect to maintainence in salt water, it's better on a boat that size to trailer. That way you can flush the motor, wash things down and it helps the engines last longer. With respect to I/O, it's better to get a Fresh Water Cooled (FWC) motor than Raw Water Cooled (RWC) for obvioius reasons. As a general piece of advice for a new boat owner, find somebody who knows boats to check these out for you or pay a compentant outboard/inboard mechanic to check out the boats. LOOK AT A LOT OF BOATS!!! Don't settle for anything - the more you look at, the more guestions you ask, the more you learn and when you do buy, you will be more confident in your first boat purchase. At this time in history, used boats are plentiful. Check boattraderonline.com, boats.com, the used listings in your area and just go and look - get a feel for pricing, ages, types. Check out marina listings, go to in-water boat shows - get a firm idea of what it is you want and need. Good luck. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ----------- "Angling may be said to be so like the mathematics that it can never be fully learnt..." Izaak Walton "The Compleat Angler", 1653 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inboard vs Outboard | Cruising | |||
Help installing in the Vancouver Canada area | Electronics |