jps wrote:
In article . net,
says...

jps wrote:


In article et,
says...



Wal-Mart does not hold anyone's head under water.
Wal-Mart's manpower needs are very different from
Microsoft's. Each pays the appropriate wage to attract
the talent they need. Neither is unionized.


Walmart screws people in order to gain a competitive advantage in the
marketplace.

Wal-Mart doesn't screw anyone. They offer employment,
and people voluntarily take it.


Because, unless they want to live on welfare and food stamps, there are
few other choices.

Read this and learn something...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Dec13.html

You'll see a quote from your hallowed Employment Policy Institute about
the fact that jobs being created are "low quality."

Is it better to have a low quality job, or no job at
all, asswipe?

Why don't these people do something to EARN their way
into higher quality jobs?

Labor is just another input into the production
process. There is no reason to treat it any
differently than iron ore or electricity or Post-it
notes. The price for it is set by supply and demand,
just as any other input resource.

Deal with it.