"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven
witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that
a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To
others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan
(the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous
manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a
well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my
argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge
ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't
figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and
activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years
old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct
that
in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.


Why (and how) did you delete your original post that claimed it was "Wood"
not "Woods"?



Because he was wrong but not man enough to admit it.

Pretty telling.