"A Freedom of Information Act request by The Post for Kerry's records
produced six pages of information. A spokesman for the Navy Personnel
Command, Mike McClellan, said he was not authorized to release the full
file, which consists of at least a hundred pages."

Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 22, 2004; Page A01

More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy Policy
meetings; or pre-Sept 11th briefings about terrorists flying airplanes
into buildings.

However, the Bush-Cheney White House is the most secretive in all
history. They make Nixon look like a blabbermouth. So, therefor, it
behooves all Bush supporters to demand that everybody else release all
documents publicly, right?

NOYB wrote:
"A Freedom of Information Act request by The Post for Kerry's records
produced six pages of information. A spokesman for the Navy Personnel
Command, Mike McClellan, said he was not authorized to release the full
file, which consists of at least a hundred pages."

Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 22, 2004; Page A01

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy Policy
meetings;

Your side already went to court on that one...and lost.


or pre-Sept 11th briefings about terrorists flying airplanes
into buildings.

Ask Sandy Berger for the memos to those. He was caught stuffing them into
his socks.

NOYB wrote:

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy Policy
meetings;

Your side already went to court on that one...and lost.

Nope. Still boiling on the back burner.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the
Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy Policy
meetings;

Your side already went to court on that one...and lost.

Nope. Still boiling on the back burner.

Where it will remain until after November. And then nobody will give a damn
until the '06 mid-term elections.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy Policy
meetings;

Your side already went to court on that one...and lost.

And that's OK with you? You think those results are acceptable???

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the
Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy Policy
meetings;

Your side already went to court on that one...and lost.

And that's OK with you? You think those results are acceptable???

Not just acceptable. Desirable.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the
Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy
Policy
meetings;

Your side already went to court on that one...and lost.

And that's OK with you? You think those results are acceptable???

Not just acceptable. Desirable.



Let's get this straight: Corporate personnel are involved in making PUBLIC
POLICY, and you think it's desirable that the proceedings be kept secret?
Explain.

More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy Policy
meetings;


NOYB wrote:
Your side already went to court on that one...and lost.

Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom for U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
More to the point might be a release of some of the papers from the Bush
Presidency... such as Cheney's notes from his top-secret Energy Policy
meetings;


NOYB wrote:
Your side already went to court on that one...and lost.

Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom for U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.

"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters. If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn. If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the same guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee zones),
there'd be no case.