"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others, it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled that it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander Butterfield
are. LOL

"jim--" wrote in message
...

That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL


Wasn't Alexander Butterfield married to that woman who makes pancake syrup

"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup?

I wouldn't call that narrowmindedness. I'd call it uneducated, or lack
of knowledge. Right up to the point where you start offering opinions
(or stating opinions strongly, including calling those who disagree
names) on the subject without any knowledge even when it's been held out
to you.

Then it becomes stupid.

... I was 2 years old when Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.

Still think his opinion on the secretiveness of the Bush White House is
irrelevant?

Yes.


Still think John Dean is a "liberal activist lawyer"?

yes

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others, it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in 5
minutes time.

NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others, it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in 5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.




--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes.
I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.



Care to venture a bet on that Krause?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes.
I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.


I would venture any amount of money against your 36 foot custom made lobster
boat that her name is indeed Rose Mary Woods.

The problem is that you do not own a 36 foot custom made lobster boat.

So I will put up $200,000 against your 25 footer...certainly far more than
it is worth....against your claim that there was not a Rose Mary Woods
related to the Nixon scandal vs. your claim of a Rose Mary Wood.

What say you skipper?

In the mood or will you back out of this one also?

Eh?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:2p4k54Fgg5scU2@uni-
Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Ker-ripes, Harry you are beginning to sound more and more like Basskisser.

Damn you have real problems with hard facts Krause. Her name was and is
Rose Mary Woods.

Is your problem excessive drug abuse or are you off your meds again?

"jim--" wrote in message
...

Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.



Care to venture a bet on that Krause?


jim--,\
Harry is sounding more and more like Basskisser. It looks like both of them
have lost it.

DSK wrote in message ...

They make Nixon look like a blabbermouth.

How hard could that be. Nixon was a blabbermouth that recorded a lot
of his balbbering.

So, therefor, it
behooves all Bush supporters to demand that everybody else release all
documents publicly, right?

Nope. I don't think that all documents should be released.

All of Bush's miltary records? OK - though Bush is not holding up his
military experience as a reason to elect him.

Kerry's miltary records? Kerry is claiming to be a war hero. It is
being disputed. He is using his war hero status as a qaulification to
be president. The most definitely his records should be released.

Kerry would have been a lot better off if he had not taken the war
hero route. 4 months in Vietnam on a fifty foot boat does not bestow
and magical qualifications to be commander-in-chief. But by basing
his using it as the foundation of his candidacy, he has invited the
scrutiny of his miltary record.


NOYB wrote:
"A Freedom of Information Act request by The Post for Kerry's records
produced six pages of information. A spokesman for the Navy Personnel
Command, Mike McClellan, said he was not authorized to release the full
file, which consists of at least a hundred pages."

Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 22, 2004; Page A01

Curtis CCR wrote:

DSK wrote in message ...

They make Nixon look like a blabbermouth.

How hard could that be. Nixon was a blabbermouth that recorded a lot
of his balbbering.

So was LBJ. There seem to be lifetimes of his recorded conversations
with folks in his office and on the phones...they go on and on and on...



--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.



--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.


I would venture any amount of money against your 36 foot custom made
lobster boat that her name is indeed Rose Mary Woods.

The problem is that you do not own a 36 foot custom made lobster boat.

So I will put up $200,000 against your 25 footer...certainly far more than
it is worth....against your claim that there was not a Rose Mary Woods
related to the Nixon scandal vs. your claim of a Rose Mary Wood.

What say you skipper?

In the mood or will you back out of this one also?

Eh?

I see you have been on the board for some time as you have responded to
several posts well after I posted this one.

So I will ask again.....What say you Krause to my bet?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that
a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To
others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan
(the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous
manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a
well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't
figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and
activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that
in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.

Nice swerve.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that
a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To
others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan
(the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous
manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a
well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't
figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and
activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that
in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.


Why (and how) did you delete your original post that claimed it was "Wood"
not "Woods"?

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven
witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that
a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To
others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan
(the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous
manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a
well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my
argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge
ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't
figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and
activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years
old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct
that
in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.


Why (and how) did you delete your original post that claimed it was "Wood"
not "Woods"?



Because he was wrong but not man enough to admit it.

Pretty telling.

They make Nixon look like a blabbermouth.


Curtis CCR wrote:
How hard could that be. Nixon was a blabbermouth that recorded a lot
of his balbbering.

Nixon also kept a lot of things secret... a deeply ingrained policy.
Among other things, he would relay partial (or in some cases falsified)
info to the military in order to keep them from knowing his real plans.


So, therefor, it
behooves all Bush supporters to demand that everybody else release all
documents publicly, right?


Nope. I don't think that all documents should be released.

OK which ones?



All of Bush's miltary records? OK - though Bush is not holding up his
military experience as a reason to elect him.

Really? He seems to make some use of it. About as much as Kerry,
actually. I have seen far more Republicans going on and on and on about
Kerry's war record than Democrats.


Kerry's miltary records? Kerry is claiming to be a war hero.

No, he's not. The Bush-Cheney campaign is claiming that he claims to be one.


.... But by basing
his using it as the foundation of his candidacy, he has invited the
scrutiny of his miltary record.

Really? It seems more reasonable to me that the records of Bush and
Kerry should be parked side by side for public inspection.

The argument that Kerry has made himself a legitimate target for this
kind of slander is too close to Rush Limbaugh's claims that Chelsea
Clinton is a legitimate target.

There is no "legitmate target" for abusive slander & character
assassination. If this is the kind of campaign that Bush & Cheney want
to run, what does that say about 1- their performance on the job and 2-
their own moral qualifications to be leaders?

Regards
Doug King

Kripes Harry,
No one believes that anymore than they believe you own a Lobster Boat or
your wife is anything more than a social worker.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.



--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

NYOB,
Not only is he anal, but he is wrong.

Kripes what a jerk. eh


"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To
others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous
manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a
well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and
activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that
in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.

Wierd. Your post appeared, then disappeared, and then reappeared.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message

thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven
witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a
blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal"
that
a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To
others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan
(the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous
manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source,
a
well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my
argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge
ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't
figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and
activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow
mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of
the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years
old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct
that
in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.


Why (and how) did you delete your original post that claimed it was
"Wood"
not "Woods"?


I didn;t delete anything.

--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:52:33 -0400, something compelled "NOYB"
, to say:

Wierd. Your post appeared, then disappeared, and then reappeared.

First there is a mountain, then there is no mountain, then there
is.

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:EybXc.92697$TI1.59905@attbi_s52...
NYOB,
Not only is he anal, but he is wrong.

Kripes what a jerk. eh

If you caught some spelling error, you'd be the first to start a whole
new post to proclaim such, John Smith.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:EybXc.92697$TI1.59905@attbi_s52...
NYOB,
Not only is he anal, but he is wrong.

Kripes what a jerk. eh

If you caught some spelling error, you'd be the first to start a whole
new post to proclaim such, John Smith.

Psssst....bass....it was not a spelling error that Krause made. Understand?

Basskisser,
What spelling error are you talking about? Harry was ridiculing someone for
not knowing Mrs. Woods name was really Mrs. Wood. When ones wants to
ridicule someone for making a mistake, it is prudent to make sure you are
correct.

Kripes, your mind is becoming more feeble everyday.

I understand their is a new drug that will delay the onset of Alzheimer, it
is time you saw your doctor. He might just tell you that your inability to
comprehend simple thought processes is the result of drug abuse and FAS, and
not Alzheimer's but it is worth a try.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:EybXc.92697$TI1.59905@attbi_s52...
NYOB,
Not only is he anal, but he is wrong.

Kripes what a jerk. eh

If you caught some spelling error, you'd be the first to start a whole
new post to proclaim such, John Smith.

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:17:51 -0400, DSK wrote:

Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom for U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

Sir:

The Independent Counsel, Kenneth Starr, was not appointed to "nail" Mr. Clinton
for his sexual escapades and peccadillo. He was appointed to investigate the
Clintons' involvement in the failed Whitewater development 20 years before.

Having essentially unlimited funds, staff, time and subpoena power enabled
Inquisitor Starr and his staff to delve into the Paula Jones matter and,
ultimately, to hit "pay dirt" with Monica Lewinsky, arguably the most famous
fellatrice of our time.

But to suggest that uncovering these sexual activities was Mr. Starr's original
purpose is, I believe, incorrect.

That was simply a bonus for him--the payoff after his long, arduous
investigation.

And don't you think he deserved at least that much? And an opportunity to enter
his own erotic prose into the public record? Lord knows, his religious
affiliations would never allow him to write and publish such steamy prose in any
other context!

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:01:37 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

[elided]

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in 5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.

Sir:

One of the problems with dispensing spelling flames (apart from their pettiness,
of course) is that one's _own_ spelling becomes a legitimate target.

In this case, for example, you are quite incorrect. Mr. Nixon's secretary, the
renowned tape recorder operator, was Rose Mary Woods.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:BCkXc.64046$Fg5.37089@attbi_s53...
Basskisser,
What spelling error are you talking about? Harry was ridiculing someone for
not knowing Mrs. Woods name was really Mrs. Wood. When ones wants to
ridicule someone for making a mistake, it is prudent to make sure you are
correct.

Do you really think that Mrs. Woods is NOT a misspelling of Mrs. Wood?
That's odd.... Now, again, you've made two allegations below, that I
abuse drugs, and have FAS, along with a NEW one, Alzheimer's (it's NOT
"Alzheimer") Do you have any proof of ANY of those? You keep stating
such, and you are never able to show any evidence, and when I ask for
some, you just come up with more and more drivel.. Care to try again?

And, if you are going talk about making sure you are correct, you need
to re-read your third sentence....BWAAAAHAAA!!!!!

Basskisser,

I know you suffer from FAS and your brain is fried from excessive drug use,
but you should not make it so easy for everyone to see. Woods was not a
typo or spelling mistake. Harry stated: "Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary
Wood, NOT Woods. You fellows really have problems with hard facts."

Now the funny part of all of this is her real name is "Woods" not "Wood", so
when Harry was ridiculing NYOB for making a mistake, he was really just
sticking his foot down his throat. Sort of like you do on all of your
posts.

Now, if you print this out, and read it slowly, maybe a few times, I think
even you can follow the thread.





"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:BCkXc.64046$Fg5.37089@attbi_s53...
Basskisser,
What spelling error are you talking about? Harry was ridiculing someone
for
not knowing Mrs. Woods name was really Mrs. Wood. When ones wants to
ridicule someone for making a mistake, it is prudent to make sure you
are
correct.

Do you really think that Mrs. Woods is NOT a misspelling of Mrs. Wood?
That's odd.... Now, again, you've made two allegations below, that I
abuse drugs, and have FAS, along with a NEW one, Alzheimer's (it's NOT
"Alzheimer") Do you have any proof of ANY of those? You keep stating
such, and you are never able to show any evidence, and when I ask for
some, you just come up with more and more drivel.. Care to try again?

And, if you are going talk about making sure you are correct, you need
to re-read your third sentence....BWAAAAHAAA!!!!!

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:sPqXc.315022$a24.68316@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,

I know you suffer from FAS and your brain is fried from excessive drug use,

How do you "know" this. Be specific. Show what evidence you have of
such.

If someone makes a statement that the "KNOW" something, either they
have some facts, or are just ignorant. Now, which are you? I know,
you'll spew out some idiotic crap, with absolutely NO answer to what
I've just asked. Because you don't HAVE any proof, you dumb ****.

OK, BK, which one is it? Is your problem FAS or a excessive drug usage?


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:sPqXc.315022$a24.68316@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,

I know you suffer from FAS and your brain is fried from excessive drug
use,

How do you "know" this. Be specific. Show what evidence you have of
such.

If someone makes a statement that the "KNOW" something, either they
have some facts, or are just ignorant. Now, which are you? I know,
you'll spew out some idiotic crap, with absolutely NO answer to what
I've just asked. Because you don't HAVE any proof, you dumb ****.

"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:sPqXc.315022$a24.68316@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,

I know you suffer from FAS and your brain is fried from excessive drug
use,
but you should not make it so easy for everyone to see. Woods was not a
typo or spelling mistake. Harry stated: "Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary
Wood, NOT Woods. You fellows really have problems with hard facts."

Now the funny part of all of this is her real name is "Woods" not
"Wood", so
when Harry was ridiculing NYOB for making a mistake, he was really just
sticking his foot down his throat. Sort of like you do on all of your
posts.

Now, if you print this out, and read it slowly, maybe a few times, I
think
even you can follow the thread.

Expecting asslicker to master reading comprehension.?
He's too busy slurping down that kerry camp koolaid and checking harry for
polyps.






"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:BCkXc.64046$Fg5.37089@attbi_s53...
Basskisser,
What spelling error are you talking about? Harry was ridiculing
someone
for
not knowing Mrs. Woods name was really Mrs. Wood. When ones wants
to
ridicule someone for making a mistake, it is prudent to make sure
you
are
correct.

Do you really think that Mrs. Woods is NOT a misspelling of Mrs. Wood?
That's odd.... Now, again, you've made two allegations below, that I
abuse drugs, and have FAS, along with a NEW one, Alzheimer's (it's NOT
"Alzheimer") Do you have any proof of ANY of those? You keep stating
such, and you are never able to show any evidence, and when I ask for
some, you just come up with more and more drivel.. Care to try again?

And, if you are going talk about making sure you are correct, you need
to re-read your third sentence....BWAAAAHAAA!!!!!

I know I should be ashamed of myself for picking on the mentally
handicapped, but it just is so much fun.

I loved it when BK took the stance that Schnapps was a whiskey and to prove
his point he cut and pasted a definition that stated whisky is
differentiated from other grain alcohols because whiskey is aged in oak
barrels. Even when it was pointed out that his definition stated Schnapps
was not a whiskey, he insisted it was.

BK keeps stating he is not a victim of FAS or excessive drug abuse, what he
fails to realize is it really doesn't matter why he is mentally handicapped,
but he definitely is.

My guess is it is a combination of FAS and excessive drug abuse, combined
with "bad genes".




"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:sPqXc.315022$a24.68316@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,

I know you suffer from FAS and your brain is fried from excessive drug
use,
but you should not make it so easy for everyone to see. Woods was not
a
typo or spelling mistake. Harry stated: "Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose
Mary
Wood, NOT Woods. You fellows really have problems with hard facts."

Now the funny part of all of this is her real name is "Woods" not
"Wood", so
when Harry was ridiculing NYOB for making a mistake, he was really
just
sticking his foot down his throat. Sort of like you do on all of your
posts.

Now, if you print this out, and read it slowly, maybe a few times, I
think
even you can follow the thread.

Expecting asslicker to master reading comprehension.?
He's too busy slurping down that kerry camp koolaid and checking harry
for
polyps.






"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:BCkXc.64046$Fg5.37089@attbi_s53...
Basskisser,
What spelling error are you talking about? Harry was ridiculing
someone
for
not knowing Mrs. Woods name was really Mrs. Wood. When ones wants
to
ridicule someone for making a mistake, it is prudent to make sure
you
are
correct.

Do you really think that Mrs. Woods is NOT a misspelling of Mrs.
Wood?
That's odd.... Now, again, you've made two allegations below, that I
abuse drugs, and have FAS, along with a NEW one, Alzheimer's (it's
NOT
"Alzheimer") Do you have any proof of ANY of those? You keep stating
such, and you are never able to show any evidence, and when I ask
for
some, you just come up with more and more drivel.. Care to try
again?

And, if you are going talk about making sure you are correct, you
need
to re-read your third sentence....BWAAAAHAAA!!!!!

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:9%FXc.191188$8_6.138274@attbi_s04...
OK, BK, which one is it? Is your problem FAS or a excessive drug usage?


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:sPqXc.315022$a24.68316@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,

I know you suffer from FAS and your brain is fried from excessive drug
use,

How do you "know" this. Be specific. Show what evidence you have of
such.

If someone makes a statement that the "KNOW" something, either they
have some facts, or are just ignorant. Now, which are you? I know,
you'll spew out some idiotic crap, with absolutely NO answer to what
I've just asked. Because you don't HAVE any proof, you dumb ****.

This is great!!! You don't even realize how bad it looks for you!! Man
you are dumb as a post!!! I've given you every opportunity to pony up
some facts for the **** that you spew, and every single time you can't
so you come up with something even dumber!!!!!

"P. Fritz" wrote in message ...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:sPqXc.315022$a24.68316@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,

I know you suffer from FAS and your brain is fried from excessive drug
use,
but you should not make it so easy for everyone to see. Woods was not a
typo or spelling mistake. Harry stated: "Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary
Wood, NOT Woods. You fellows really have problems with hard facts."

Now the funny part of all of this is her real name is "Woods" not
"Wood", so
when Harry was ridiculing NYOB for making a mistake, he was really just
sticking his foot down his throat. Sort of like you do on all of your
posts.

Now, if you print this out, and read it slowly, maybe a few times, I
think
even you can follow the thread.

Expecting asslicker to master reading comprehension.?
He's too busy slurping down that kerry camp koolaid and checking harry for
polyps.

What an ignorant piece of **** you are!!!!

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:UgGXc.191260$8_6.18024@attbi_s04...
I know I should be ashamed of myself for picking on the mentally
handicapped, but it just is so much fun.

I loved it when BK took the stance that Schnapps was a whiskey and to prove
his point he cut and pasted a definition that stated whisky is
differentiated from other grain alcohols because whiskey is aged in oak
barrels. Even when it was pointed out that his definition stated Schnapps
was not a whiskey, he insisted it was.

BK keeps stating he is not a victim of FAS or excessive drug abuse, what he
fails to realize is it really doesn't matter why he is mentally handicapped,
but he definitely is.

One more time, dumb ass. please state what evidence you have of the
above. Simple question, can be answered easily: Do you have any?
If so, what?

OK, so which one is it?


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:9%FXc.191188$8_6.138274@attbi_s04...
OK, BK, which one is it? Is your problem FAS or a excessive drug
usage?


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:sPqXc.315022$a24.68316@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,

I know you suffer from FAS and your brain is fried from excessive
drug
use,

How do you "know" this. Be specific. Show what evidence you have of
such.

If someone makes a statement that the "KNOW" something, either they
have some facts, or are just ignorant. Now, which are you? I know,
you'll spew out some idiotic crap, with absolutely NO answer to what
I've just asked. Because you don't HAVE any proof, you dumb ****.

This is great!!! You don't even realize how bad it looks for you!! Man
you are dumb as a post!!! I've given you every opportunity to pony up
some facts for the **** that you spew, and every single time you can't
so you come up with something even dumber!!!!!

Just reread my comment, you are mentally deficient and it is obvious to
everyone you meet.


"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:UgGXc.191260$8_6.18024@attbi_s04...
I know I should be ashamed of myself for picking on the mentally
handicapped, but it just is so much fun.

I loved it when BK took the stance that Schnapps was a whiskey and to
prove
his point he cut and pasted a definition that stated whisky is
differentiated from other grain alcohols because whiskey is aged in oak
barrels. Even when it was pointed out that his definition stated
Schnapps
was not a whiskey, he insisted it was.

BK keeps stating he is not a victim of FAS or excessive drug abuse, what
he
fails to realize is it really doesn't matter why he is mentally
handicapped,
but he definitely is.

One more time, dumb ass. please state what evidence you have of the
above. Simple question, can be answered easily: Do you have any?
If so, what?

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:19:58 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


Admit it...you had no idea who John Dean is...none, zip. D'oh.

He can find out who he is by searching the web...just like you do for
every issue discussed here.