| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
It looks like theses motors use the same block, likely intake and
exhaust. HP difference may come from carb and rpm. Weight of these motors is pretty much the same. Often the more powerful motor will use less fuel at certain speeds as it doesnt have to work as hard. The only issue that would point at the 40 HP is money. If cost for the 50 isnt prohibitive then get that. I wouldnt recommend getting the 40 and lateron tweak it to get 50 HP (not worth it). I dont know how well tubing with a pontoon boat works ... might require twin 400HP ? ![]() Matt (Marko) wrote in message . com... I'm buying an 18' pontoon that weighs 1050 lbs. I decided on the 40hp Honda but I'm wondering if the 50hp would be better for pulling my kids on a tube. Besides tubing, I'll also be trolling for walleyes, trout, etc. Both motors weigh 212 lbs. Any recommendations? I need to decide soon. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Honda EU3000is - maybe NOT a good idea.... | Cruising | |||
| Honda 40hp...2003 vs. 2004 | General | |||
| Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question | General | |||
| Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question | Cruising | |||