JAXAshby wrote:

yeah, hoary, those damn laws of physics were voted in by corrupt politicians
and their ain't no way *you* will EVER get sucked by them.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how
fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs, for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.

The comment I offered here was on the depths of water I've measured in a
particular area. If you want to dispute the numbers, go right ahead. But
Thunder is right: you simply are trying to suck posters into another of
your long, inane arguments. In that regard, you're like that ugly old
witch from Australia--Lucretia Smith.


As I stated, I offered observations on water depths. Feel free to
comment upon those observations at any time.
I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:

yeah, hoary, those damn laws of physics were voted in by corrupt
politicians
and their ain't no way *you* will EVER get sucked by them.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how
fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of
water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course
this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's
plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs,
for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.

The comment I offered here was on the depths of water I've measured in a
particular area. If you want to dispute the numbers, go right ahead. But
Thunder is right: you simply are trying to suck posters into another of
your long, inane arguments. In that regard, you're like that ugly old
witch from Australia--Lucretia Smith.


As I stated, I offered observations on water depths. Feel free to
comment upon those observations at any time.
I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.

So how was that storm surge during the rain storm this weekend on the Bay?
Must have been frightful, especially since it was accompanied by 3-5
footers. Scary stuff....eh Krause?

hoary, you seem to have a major gap in your recall of what and how much you
said. And after only a few hours. geesh.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

yeah, hoary, those damn laws of physics were voted in by corrupt
politicians
and their ain't no way *you* will EVER get sucked by them.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 8:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, have you ANY idea what fetch is? obviously you have no idea how
fetch
affects things, but do you even know what fetch is?

From: Harry Krause
Date: 8/16/2004 6:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

thunder wrote:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:02:46 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I don't know what JaxAss is trying to prove, other than being
argumentative.

He's trying to get someone to buy into a long, inane argument on the
mathematical properties of waves. A 5' wave will break in 6.5' of
water,
making much of the Chesapeake incapable of supporting it, of course
this
disregards many other factors.

It's along the edges in the mid-Bay where it shallows up. There's plenty
of water once you are away from shore a ways. At the Calvert Cliffs, for
example, once you are out a half mile or so, there's 20' of water, and
you can watch your depth gauge drop down to 80-90' or so as you get to
the channel.

The comment I offered here was on the depths of water I've measured in a
particular area. If you want to dispute the numbers, go right ahead. But
Thunder is right: you simply are trying to suck posters into another of
your long, inane arguments. In that regard, you're like that ugly old
witch from Australia--Lucretia Smith.


As I stated, I offered observations on water depths. Feel free to
comment upon those observations at any time.
I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, you seem to have a major gap in your recall of what and how much you
said. And after only a few hours. geesh.



I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.
How's that crappy little sailbote of yours? Ready to take on Long Island
Sound?


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

I'm NOT interested in getting involved in another of your long, inane
arguments.
How's that crappy little sailbote of yours? Ready to take on Long Island
Sound?

see hoary? already you have forgotten that my Porta-Bote does not have the
optional sailing rig.