But he does as a Senator but does not want to bring his past 20 years up.
Strange.

His Senate career is a matter of public record. His constituents have been
pleased well enough to reelect him repeatedly. Next wobbly accusation?

In that case, it's all about character.

What a bunch of pure BS. You know better than that Chuck.

You don't believe character is important?
That it's a prime requisite for POTUS?
How about aspects of character, like honesty, intelligence, integrity, and so
forth? Are they "BS" as well?

If we take his past 20 years in the Senate as any indication then it is
obvious that he will push for higher taxes on all of us and more government
control of our lives.

The current guy has obliterated the Bill of Rights. How does that square with
your concern about "government control of our lives"? The current guy has run
up a debt
that will take generations to pay back. How does that square with your concern
about taxation? I'll take a full and faithful restoration of the Constitution
and a moderation of the deficit, thank you very much.

So character is important now but was not an issue when Clinton was in
office? Funny stuff Chuck.



Character has always been important.
I condemned Clinton for a lack of it. You're the Google star. Try "Clinton,
disgrace, embarassed the office" and see what you find.

The character assassination is being done by a group of men independant of
the President

Well, at least we agree that it *is* a case of character assassination. There
may be hope for you still.

I am trying to show that the opinions of these guys carry as much weight as
the 9 you have been discussing...zippo.


You're trying to make a point that working alongside somebody for 4-5 weeks
gives you no more insight into that person's charcter than being aboard another
boat that happpened to be going downriver and passed Kerry's boat going up.

That doesn't make sense.

Bridge back to you. Sorry.