In article ,
says...
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:44:01 -0700, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:53:39 -0700, jps wrote:

For all you who served in the military, have a look at what the GOP is
unleashing against Kerry.

Get a boat you liberal faggot!

I've got two you silly turd.

Two you? English is not you major eh? Stupid arse.

What do you not understand about "I've got two?" dip****.

Would it help if I said I own two boats?

Get it now Bubba?

jps wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:44:01 -0700, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:53:39 -0700, jps wrote:

For all you who served in the military, have a look at what the GOP is
unleashing against Kerry.

Get a boat you liberal faggot!

I've got two you silly turd.

Two you? English is not you major eh? Stupid arse.

What do you not understand about "I've got two?" dip****.


The entire concept...most of these right-wingnuts are castratos who sing
countertenor.




--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

Get a boat you liberal faggot!

I've got two you silly turd.

Two you? English is not you major eh? Stupid arse.

He should have placed a comma after "two". You should have used one following
"major". I'd say you guys are about even on this issue.

On 06 Aug 2004 02:08:46 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Get a boat you liberal faggot!

I've got two you silly turd.

Two you? English is not you major eh? Stupid arse.

He should have placed a comma after "two". You should have used one following
"major". I'd say you guys are about even on this issue.

What do you expect from a couple of liberal assholes like you two. Or should
I have said too?

In a round about way this is actually boating related,
Here's the commercial
http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesui...video_wmv.html

In article ,
jps wrote:


For all you who served in the military, have a look at what the GOP is
unleashing against Kerry.

Thank God there are good folks like John McCain who'll stand up to the
bull****, no matter the source.

jps



http://mediamatters.org/items/200408050007

The cited web "report" is from a left-wing attack group which has led the
charge in partisan political abuse and fraud upon the public through the
public airwaves and media.

These are the same people who have tried to remove Rush Limbaugh from the
Armed Forces Radio Network, charging that there are no "liberal voices" on
AFRN.

Of course they completely ignore NPR, which is about as left-wing as you can
find anywhere, and is also carried on AFRN.

They further ignore the fact that Limbaugh was installed on AFRN AT THE
REQUEST OF SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN WHO WANTED TO HEAR HIM.

Gee, something's wrong with catering to those who are your "customers"?

I guess so - if you're a lefty.

Nothing "Media Matters" says or does is unbiased or fair. Indeed, their
entire purpose is to attack any conservative viewpoint.

--
--
Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://boaterforum.com Talk about Boating online - any topic, any time!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!

Karl Denninger wrote:
These are the same people who have tried to remove Rush Limbaugh from the
Armed Forces Radio Network, charging that there are no "liberal voices" on
AFRN.

You have to be a right-wing whacko to think that NPR is left-wing. It is
as balanced and unbiased as any media can get.

Of course you think otherwise, the voices on right-wing hate radio tell
you so. But they don't tell you that NPR carries many of President
Bush's speeches, interviews with General Tommy Franks, etc etc. Boy talk
about a leftist agenda!

DSK

On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:58:31 -0400, DSK wrote:


You have to be a right-wing whacko to think that NPR is left-wing. It is
as balanced and unbiased as any media can get.

The big problem with NPR is that they also give the left wing
perspective. In order to be unbiased they need to only give the right
wing version.

bb

The big problem with NPR is that they also give the left wing
perspective. In order to be unbiased they need to only give the right
wing version.

bb

I think that's what p's off the conservatives.
The RW position is most often based on emotion, and that doesn't fare so well
when contrasted with logical analysis.

Yesterday, reached at his home, Elliott said he regretted signing the
affidavit and said he still thinks Kerry deserved the Silver Star.

''I still don't think he shot the guy in the back," Elliott said. ''It
was a terrible mistake probably for me to sign the affidavit with
those words. I'm the one in trouble here."


IOW, Elliott's conscience has been working on him. "I shouldn't have signed
that"? That phrase indicates his statement was already prepared for him, rather
than
an actual expression of personal opinon.

Typical in cases like this.