BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   anchor question? (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/21-re-anchor-question.html)

nom=de=plume[_2_] June 15th 10 09:48 PM

anchor question?
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jun 14, 11:46 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


two cans with
a string between them?

You have a LOT to learn!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



That describes my internet connection

?;^ )


heh...



nom=de=plume[_2_] June 15th 10 09:48 PM

anchor question?
 

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
On 6/15/2010 4:12 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jun 14, 11:46 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...



nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:18:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I have no doubt that coral exists in lots of places. Seems to me
that
you
can almost always avoid them if you're careful.

Not always true, depends on where you are.

Seems like a contradiction to me. If it depends on where you are, and
you
know there's coral "there," then you should be able to avoid that
place.
Also, I said almost always... not always.

You said that "there is no real need to avoid them," but in the
previous
sentence said that they "are very sharp and abrasive." Seems to me
that
there is a real need to avoid them.

There is no need to avoid them for ecological reasons, and assuming
you have a decent length of chain attached to your anchor, as
everyone
should, there is no reason to be concerned about abrasion either.

I guess it depends on the definition of "decent length" of chain. Is
that
20' or 30' or all chain or what? Seems open to interpretation. And, if
you have less than a decent amount, and you know you're going to a
place
that potentially has coral, seems reasonable to either avoid that
place,
get more chain, or talk to the locals before you try to anchor.

Talk to the locals? Now that's funny!

Nom: Hi! I'm going to go on a cruise and I will be anchoring at
exactly
37.846474,-122.664127. Is that a suitable area to anchor?

Locals: Say what? You have a LOT to learn!

Lat/Lon in the SF area? Seems rather more precise than you can really be
with a GPS. I guess you'd be unable to get any info about the conditions
before you go, because you're incapable of using a phone, VHF, two cans
with
a string between them?

You have a LOT to learn!


That's telling them, D'Plume. You're speaking like an experienced
yeoman now.


Not quite, but she's getting there. I rather enjoy these little missaves
of hers.


You're a stalker. You're probably pretty tiny also.



Wayne.B June 15th 10 10:24 PM

anchor question?
 
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:47:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:44:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure. That's
the
point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.


The solution(s) are left as a student excercise as they become more
familiar with boats, boating, equipment and seamanship.

Hint: Necessity is the mother of invention.


So, you're unable or unwilling to answer a question? So much for your
credentials....


Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.

Wiley June 15th 10 10:52 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/15/2010 4:48 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
On 6/15/2010 4:12 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jun 14, 11:46 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...



nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:18:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I have no doubt that coral exists in lots of places. Seems to me
that
you
can almost always avoid them if you're careful.

Not always true, depends on where you are.

Seems like a contradiction to me. If it depends on where you are,
and you
know there's coral "there," then you should be able to avoid that
place.
Also, I said almost always... not always.

You said that "there is no real need to avoid them," but in the
previous
sentence said that they "are very sharp and abrasive." Seems to
me that
there is a real need to avoid them.

There is no need to avoid them for ecological reasons, and assuming
you have a decent length of chain attached to your anchor, as
everyone
should, there is no reason to be concerned about abrasion either.

I guess it depends on the definition of "decent length" of chain.
Is that
20' or 30' or all chain or what? Seems open to interpretation.
And, if
you have less than a decent amount, and you know you're going to a
place
that potentially has coral, seems reasonable to either avoid that
place,
get more chain, or talk to the locals before you try to anchor.

Talk to the locals? Now that's funny!

Nom: Hi! I'm going to go on a cruise and I will be anchoring at
exactly
37.846474,-122.664127. Is that a suitable area to anchor?

Locals: Say what? You have a LOT to learn!

Lat/Lon in the SF area? Seems rather more precise than you can
really be
with a GPS. I guess you'd be unable to get any info about the
conditions
before you go, because you're incapable of using a phone, VHF, two
cans with
a string between them?

You have a LOT to learn!

That's telling them, D'Plume. You're speaking like an experienced
yeoman now.


Not quite, but she's getting there. I rather enjoy these little
missaves of hers.


You're a stalker. You're probably pretty tiny also.


Tiny with respect to what? What size is ideal for you?

nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 12:42 AM

anchor question?
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:47:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:44:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure. That's
the
point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.

The solution(s) are left as a student excercise as they become more
familiar with boats, boating, equipment and seamanship.

Hint: Necessity is the mother of invention.


So, you're unable or unwilling to answer a question? So much for your
credentials....


Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.



Jim June 16th 10 01:04 AM

anchor question?
 
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:47:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:44:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure.
That's
the
point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.

The solution(s) are left as a student excercise as they become more
familiar with boats, boating, equipment and seamanship.

Hint: Necessity is the mother of invention.

So, you're unable or unwilling to answer a question? So much for your
credentials....


Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.

What question? All your questions have been answered.
But you want to argue instead of learn.
In case you're still asking about how to hoist chain hand over hand if
you don't have a windlass, it goes one of two ways.
Left hand pulls, then right hand, or right hand pulls, then left hand.
So it depends which hand you start pulling with.
Let me know if that didn't answer your question.
Or maybe you want to argue about coral?

Jim - Wearing my Helpful Hat.




Larry[_21_] June 16th 10 01:29 AM

anchor question?
 
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jun 14, 4:52 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:35:13 -0400, Wiley
wrote:

Pass the popcorn. The dumpster Diva is going to teach Wayne all
about
coral, and ground tackle. This should be good.

Heh.

There's always more to learn but I will be filtering carefully.
:-)

So, Wayne... for someone who promotes "teaching" is this kind of
comment one
you approve of? Apparently it is, since you think he's amusing.

Yet, you have no problem scolding me about _my_ attitude...

OK, I'll jump in here. I didn't see Wayne aproving of anyone elses
comments, and I didn't see where Wayne thought the other post[s] were
amusing. But Wayne is a great sailor and not only with his Grand Banks
but is an accomplished wind sailor/racer.

I have no doubt that Wayne is a great sailor. He said it the very
last post:

jerkPass the popcorn. The dumpster Diva is going to teach Wayne all
about
jerkcoral, and ground tackle. This should be good.
wayne Heh.
wayne There's always more to learn but I will be filtering
carefully. :-)

So, was he amused or not, in your humble opinion, by the dumpster
Diva reference?


If I was to be a sail or a trawler, I wouldnt' take his advice
lightly. From what I understand the reason why there is so much chain
involved is not only to thwart scrapes that would cut a rope but the
weight of the chain helps to set the anchor. There's more than one
reason to use chain and the length of the chain than what seems to be
of face value.

Ok. And what about retrieving the chain if you don't have help from
the windlass?


You are looking at 40'+ boats without a windlass?

Keep on trollin'


Please show me where I said that. What I said was what happens if it
fails to work. So, you're just an idiot.


You never asked that question.

Larry[_21_] June 16th 10 01:31 AM

anchor question?
 
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:54:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Half a boat length of chain is the recommended minimum. Most serious
cruisers are using all chain (with a snubber) for a variety of good
reasons.

Did you get a copy of Chapman's yet ? You'll learn a lot from it and
get more details than anyone here can provide:

http://www.amazon.com/Chapman-Piloti...Small-Handling

Yes, have a copy though not the latest. So, a 40' boat would have at
least
20 feet. Seems like with all chain that could get pretty heavy if
you need
to get it out without a windlass... Seems like picking a good place
with
(among other things) less likelihood of coral would mean you
wouldn't need
to have as much use for all chain.


There are a number of ways to pull a heavy anchor and chain without a
windlass, but a windlass is certainly the preferred way of doing it.
Most serious cruisers prefer all chain simply because it provides more
security when anchoring, and when you are living on your boat in
remote places, that counts for a lot. Chain sets faster because the
catenary effect reduces the angle of pull on the anchor. Chain offers
a great deal of protection from accidental or intentional
cuts/abrasion. Chain has a very high ultimate breaking strength,
etc., etc.

99 out of 100 international/offshore cruising boats can't be all
wrong. Get the big anchor, get the chain, and get the windlass
unless you intend to spend all of your time in a marina.


Interesting... I'd like to know how you would go about raising an
anchor with all that chain by hand? I didn't read anything like that
so far. You can't put the chain on a regular winch right? So, I was
thinking you would have to sail up to just above the anchor, but
that's still a lot of chain/anchor.

Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure.
That's the point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.


If the windlass fails, you cut and run. I'll bet there are tens of
thousands of anchors on the bottom of the ocean that were stuck and the
Captain had no other choice.

Larry[_21_] June 16th 10 01:32 AM

anchor question?
 
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:18:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I have no doubt that coral exists in lots of places. Seems to me
that you
can almost always avoid them if you're careful.


Not always true, depends on where you are.

Seems like a contradiction to me. If it depends on where you are,
and you know there's coral "there," then you should be able to avoid
that place. Also, I said almost always... not always.

You said that "there is no real need to avoid them," but in the
previous
sentence said that they "are very sharp and abrasive." Seems to me
that
there is a real need to avoid them.

There is no need to avoid them for ecological reasons, and assuming
you have a decent length of chain attached to your anchor, as everyone
should, there is no reason to be concerned about abrasion either.

I guess it depends on the definition of "decent length" of chain. Is
that 20' or 30' or all chain or what? Seems open to interpretation.
And, if you have less than a decent amount, and you know you're
going to a place that potentially has coral, seems reasonable to
either avoid that place, get more chain, or talk to the locals
before you try to anchor.


Talk to the locals? Now that's funny!

Nom: Hi! I'm going to go on a cruise and I will be anchoring at
exactly 37.846474,-122.664127. Is that a suitable area to anchor?

Locals: Say what? You have a LOT to learn!


Lat/Lon in the SF area? Seems rather more precise than you can really
be with a GPS. I guess you'd be unable to get any info about the
conditions before you go, because you're incapable of using a phone,
VHF, two cans with a string between them?

You have a LOT to learn!


Talk with the locals and good luck with that.

Tim June 16th 10 01:44 AM

anchor question?
 
On Jun 15, 12:04*pm, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 12:55 PM, Tim wrote:



On Jun 15, 9:57 am, *wrote:
On 6/15/10 10:55 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jun 14, 11:46 pm, * *wrote:


two cans with
a string between them?


You have a LOT to learn!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


That describes my internet connection


?;^ )


When did you get the other can? * * *:)


When the paper cone gave out, Obviously!


I've got a client like you who at the moment is on vacation up in maine.
His laptop blew up...literally. He used it for email, mostly. At least
15 years old. So he wanted a suggestion for a replacement. I recommended
this:

http://tinyurl.com/287hfdm

Smith-Corona Galaxis


Too modern. I DO have one of these and it's still very functional.

http://www.parmistan.com/royal.jpg

nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 02:44 AM

anchor question?
 

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jun 14, 4:52 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:35:13 -0400, Wiley
wrote:

Pass the popcorn. The dumpster Diva is going to teach Wayne all
about
coral, and ground tackle. This should be good.

Heh.

There's always more to learn but I will be filtering carefully.
:-)

So, Wayne... for someone who promotes "teaching" is this kind of
comment one
you approve of? Apparently it is, since you think he's amusing.

Yet, you have no problem scolding me about _my_ attitude...

OK, I'll jump in here. I didn't see Wayne aproving of anyone elses
comments, and I didn't see where Wayne thought the other post[s] were
amusing. But Wayne is a great sailor and not only with his Grand Banks
but is an accomplished wind sailor/racer.

I have no doubt that Wayne is a great sailor. He said it the very last
post:

jerkPass the popcorn. The dumpster Diva is going to teach Wayne all
about
jerkcoral, and ground tackle. This should be good.
wayne Heh.
wayne There's always more to learn but I will be filtering carefully.
:-)

So, was he amused or not, in your humble opinion, by the dumpster Diva
reference?


If I was to be a sail or a trawler, I wouldnt' take his advice
lightly. From what I understand the reason why there is so much chain
involved is not only to thwart scrapes that would cut a rope but the
weight of the chain helps to set the anchor. There's more than one
reason to use chain and the length of the chain than what seems to be
of face value.

Ok. And what about retrieving the chain if you don't have help from the
windlass?


You are looking at 40'+ boats without a windlass?

Keep on trollin'


Please show me where I said that. What I said was what happens if it
fails to work. So, you're just an idiot.


You never asked that question.


You're the one claiming I said something when I didn't. You're a liar AND an
idiot.


nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 02:44 AM

anchor question?
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:47:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:44:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm
just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure.
That's
the
point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.

The solution(s) are left as a student excercise as they become more
familiar with boats, boating, equipment and seamanship.

Hint: Necessity is the mother of invention.

So, you're unable or unwilling to answer a question? So much for your
credentials....


Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.

What question? All your questions have been answered.
But you want to argue instead of learn.
In case you're still asking about how to hoist chain hand over hand if
you don't have a windlass, it goes one of two ways.
Left hand pulls, then right hand, or right hand pulls, then left hand.
So it depends which hand you start pulling with.
Let me know if that didn't answer your question.
Or maybe you want to argue about coral?

Jim - Wearing my Helpful Hat.




It's not my fault if you can't read.



nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 02:45 AM

anchor question?
 

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:54:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Half a boat length of chain is the recommended minimum. Most serious
cruisers are using all chain (with a snubber) for a variety of good
reasons.

Did you get a copy of Chapman's yet ? You'll learn a lot from it and
get more details than anyone here can provide:

http://www.amazon.com/Chapman-Piloti...Small-Handling

Yes, have a copy though not the latest. So, a 40' boat would have at
least
20 feet. Seems like with all chain that could get pretty heavy if you
need
to get it out without a windlass... Seems like picking a good place
with
(among other things) less likelihood of coral would mean you wouldn't
need
to have as much use for all chain.


There are a number of ways to pull a heavy anchor and chain without a
windlass, but a windlass is certainly the preferred way of doing it.
Most serious cruisers prefer all chain simply because it provides more
security when anchoring, and when you are living on your boat in
remote places, that counts for a lot. Chain sets faster because the
catenary effect reduces the angle of pull on the anchor. Chain offers
a great deal of protection from accidental or intentional
cuts/abrasion. Chain has a very high ultimate breaking strength,
etc., etc.

99 out of 100 international/offshore cruising boats can't be all
wrong. Get the big anchor, get the chain, and get the windlass
unless you intend to spend all of your time in a marina.


Interesting... I'd like to know how you would go about raising an anchor
with all that chain by hand? I didn't read anything like that so far. You
can't put the chain on a regular winch right? So, I was thinking you
would have to sail up to just above the anchor, but that's still a lot of
chain/anchor.

Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure. That's
the point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.


If the windlass fails, you cut and run. I'll bet there are tens of
thousands of anchors on the bottom of the ocean that were stuck and the
Captain had no other choice.


Really? How much does 100' of chain and a big anchor cost? You're going to
leave it? Sounds pretty stupid to me, but you don't own a boat, right? So,
you wouldn't even have a clue.


nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 02:46 AM

anchor question?
 

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:18:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I have no doubt that coral exists in lots of places. Seems to me that
you
can almost always avoid them if you're careful.


Not always true, depends on where you are.

Seems like a contradiction to me. If it depends on where you are, and
you know there's coral "there," then you should be able to avoid that
place. Also, I said almost always... not always.

You said that "there is no real need to avoid them," but in the
previous
sentence said that they "are very sharp and abrasive." Seems to me
that
there is a real need to avoid them.

There is no need to avoid them for ecological reasons, and assuming
you have a decent length of chain attached to your anchor, as everyone
should, there is no reason to be concerned about abrasion either.

I guess it depends on the definition of "decent length" of chain. Is
that 20' or 30' or all chain or what? Seems open to interpretation.
And, if you have less than a decent amount, and you know you're going
to a place that potentially has coral, seems reasonable to either avoid
that place, get more chain, or talk to the locals before you try to
anchor.


Talk to the locals? Now that's funny!

Nom: Hi! I'm going to go on a cruise and I will be anchoring at exactly
37.846474,-122.664127. Is that a suitable area to anchor?

Locals: Say what? You have a LOT to learn!


Lat/Lon in the SF area? Seems rather more precise than you can really be
with a GPS. I guess you'd be unable to get any info about the conditions
before you go, because you're incapable of using a phone, VHF, two cans
with a string between them?

You have a LOT to learn!


Talk with the locals and good luck with that.


So you don't think local knowledge is important... dumb and dumber...



Wayne.B June 16th 10 03:41 AM

anchor question?
 
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

Wayne.B June 16th 10 04:01 AM

anchor question?
 
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:44:03 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Too modern. I DO have one of these and it's still very functional.

http://www.parmistan.com/royal.jpg


Sorry, but i"m having trouble locating the escape and delete keys.
Must be my failing eye sight.

Where do you plug it in?

What is the baud rate?

Does it support WiFi?

How many pixels?

Broad band?

902.11g?


nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 04:40 AM

anchor question?
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?


You're not my teacher. You're some guy on a newsgroup who claims to have
great knowledge about cruising/anchoring. I asked a straightforward, honest
question.. how do you deal with 100 ft of chain and big anchor if you can't
use a windlass. It seems as though you'd rather rest on your laurels vs.
making a serious attempt to answer a serious question. I even proposed
driving up to above the anchor, but that doesn't solve the problem of
pulling up all that weight. If you want to answer the question, if you're
capable of answering the question, go for it. Otherwise, you should probably
just admit that you don't have an answer and perhaps take the lesson
yourself and find a solution, since you're actually doing the cruising and
it might come in handy.



Wayne.B June 16th 10 04:53 AM

anchor question?
 
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?


You're not my teacher.


Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.

nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 05:16 AM

anchor question?
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?


You're not my teacher.


Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.


You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to answer
the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning experience for
you. It's call humility.



TopBassDog June 16th 10 07:13 AM

anchor question?
 
On Jun 15, 9:41*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. * Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. *Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. *Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?


Exactly when did patent attorneys ever need anything. especially
valued advice?

TopBassDog June 16th 10 07:21 AM

anchor question?
 
On Jun 15, 8:45*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message

...



nom=de=plume wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:54:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Half a boat length of chain is the recommended minimum. * Most serious
cruisers are using all chain (with a snubber) for a variety of good
reasons.


Did you get a copy of Chapman's yet ? * You'll learn a lot from it and
get more details than anyone here can provide:


http://www.amazon.com/Chapman-Piloti...Small-Handling


Yes, have a copy though not the latest. So, a 40' boat would have at
least
20 feet. Seems like with all chain that could get pretty heavy if you
need
to get it out without a windlass... Seems like picking a good place
with
(among other things) less likelihood of coral would mean you wouldn't
need
to have as much use for all chain.


There are a number of ways to pull a heavy anchor and chain without a
windlass, but a windlass is certainly the preferred way of doing it.
Most serious cruisers prefer all chain simply because it provides more
security when anchoring, and when you are living on your boat in
remote places, that counts for a lot. *Chain sets faster because *the
catenary effect reduces the angle of pull on the anchor. *Chain offers
a great deal of protection from accidental or intentional
cuts/abrasion. * Chain has a very high ultimate breaking strength,
etc., etc.


99 out of 100 international/offshore cruising boats can't be all
wrong. * Get the big anchor, get the chain, and get the windlass
unless you intend to spend all of your time in a marina.


Interesting... I'd like to know how you would go about raising an anchor
with all that chain by hand? I didn't read anything like that so far. You
can't put the chain on a regular winch right? So, I was thinking you
would have to sail up to just above the anchor, but that's still a lot of
chain/anchor.


Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure. That's
the point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.


If the windlass fails, you cut and run. *I'll bet there are tens of
thousands of anchors on the bottom of the ocean that were stuck and the
Captain had no other choice.


Really? How much does 100' of chain and a big anchor cost? You're going to leave it?


What guage of chain and how heavy and what type of an anchor?

Sounds pretty stupid to me, but you don't own a boat, right? So,
you wouldn't even have a clue.


It is evident you don't own one D'Plume and never will. Especially
anything that would require 100 ft. of chain..

nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 07:23 AM

anchor question?
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Jun 15, 9:41 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?


Exactly when did patent attorneys ever need anything. especially
valued advice?


Exactly who let you out of the mental hospital? That person should be given
patent for accomplishing a miracle!



TopBassDog June 16th 10 07:23 AM

anchor question?
 
On Jun 15, 8:46*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message

...



nom=de=plume wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
om...
nom=de=plume wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:18:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


I have no doubt that coral exists in lots of places. Seems to me that
you
can almost always avoid them if you're careful.


Not always true, depends on where you are.


Seems like a contradiction to me. If it depends on where you are, and
you know there's coral "there," then you should be able to avoid that
place. Also, I said almost always... not always.


You said that "there is no real need to avoid them," but in the
previous
sentence said that they "are very sharp and abrasive." Seems to me
that
there is a real need to avoid them.


There is no need to avoid them for ecological reasons, and assuming
you have a decent length of chain attached to your anchor, as everyone
should, there is no reason to be concerned about abrasion either.


I guess it depends on the definition of "decent length" of chain. Is
that 20' or 30' or all chain or what? Seems open to interpretation.
And, if you have less than a decent amount, and you know you're going
to a place that potentially has coral, seems reasonable to either avoid
that place, get more chain, or talk to the locals before you try to
anchor.


Talk to the locals? *Now that's funny!


Nom: Hi! *I'm going to go on a cruise and I will be anchoring at exactly
37.846474,-122.664127. *Is that a suitable area to anchor?


Locals: Say what? *You have a LOT to learn!


Lat/Lon in the SF area? Seems rather more precise than you can really be
with a GPS. I guess you'd be unable to get any info about the conditions
before you go, because you're incapable of using a phone, VHF, two cans
with a string between them?


You have a LOT to learn!


Talk with the locals and good luck with that.


... dumb and dumber...


Ah, again you are gazing into the magic mirror, D'Plume?

TopBassDog June 16th 10 07:24 AM

anchor question?
 
On Jun 15, 8:44*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...



nom=de=plume wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:47:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:44:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm
just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure.
That's
the
point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.


The solution(s) are left as a student excercise as they become more
familiar with boats, boating, equipment and seamanship.


Hint: *Necessity is the mother of invention.


So, you're unable or unwilling to answer a question? So much for your
credentials....


Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. * Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. *Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. *Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise..


What question? *All your questions have been answered.
But you want to argue instead of learn.
In case you're still asking about how to hoist chain hand over hand if
you don't have a windlass, it goes one of two ways.
Left hand pulls, then right hand, or right hand pulls, then left hand.
So it depends which hand you start pulling with.
Let me know if that didn't answer your question.
Or maybe you want to argue about coral?


Jim - Wearing my Helpful Hat.


It's not my fault if you can't read.


It's no one else's fault if you can't think, D'Plume.

nom=de=plume[_2_] June 16th 10 07:25 AM

anchor question?
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Jun 15, 8:45 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message

...



nom=de=plume wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:54:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Half a boat length of chain is the recommended minimum. Most
serious
cruisers are using all chain (with a snubber) for a variety of good
reasons.


Did you get a copy of Chapman's yet ? You'll learn a lot from it
and
get more details than anyone here can provide:


http://www.amazon.com/Chapman-Piloti...Small-Handling


Yes, have a copy though not the latest. So, a 40' boat would have at
least
20 feet. Seems like with all chain that could get pretty heavy if
you
need
to get it out without a windlass... Seems like picking a good place
with
(among other things) less likelihood of coral would mean you
wouldn't
need
to have as much use for all chain.


There are a number of ways to pull a heavy anchor and chain without a
windlass, but a windlass is certainly the preferred way of doing it.
Most serious cruisers prefer all chain simply because it provides
more
security when anchoring, and when you are living on your boat in
remote places, that counts for a lot. Chain sets faster because the
catenary effect reduces the angle of pull on the anchor. Chain
offers
a great deal of protection from accidental or intentional
cuts/abrasion. Chain has a very high ultimate breaking strength,
etc., etc.


99 out of 100 international/offshore cruising boats can't be all
wrong. Get the big anchor, get the chain, and get the windlass
unless you intend to spend all of your time in a marina.


Interesting... I'd like to know how you would go about raising an
anchor
with all that chain by hand? I didn't read anything like that so far.
You
can't put the chain on a regular winch right? So, I was thinking you
would have to sail up to just above the anchor, but that's still a lot
of
chain/anchor.


Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure.
That's
the point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.


If the windlass fails, you cut and run. I'll bet there are tens of
thousands of anchors on the bottom of the ocean that were stuck and the
Captain had no other choice.


Really? How much does 100' of chain and a big anchor cost? You're going
to leave it?


What guage of chain and how heavy and what type of an anchor?


No idea. I'd imagine that chain/anchor for a 40' boat would be pretty
significant.

Sounds pretty stupid to me, but you don't own a boat, right? So,
you wouldn't even have a clue.


It is evident you don't own one D'Plume and never will. Especially
anything that would require 100 ft. of chain..


I've said I don't own a boat. I have been to the Carib, where a lot of chain
on a rental boat is pretty common. I bet you own one of the little putt-putt
boats that make a nuisance.



TopBassDog June 16th 10 07:29 AM

anchor question?
 
On Jun 15, 9:41*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. * Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. *Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. *Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.


Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?


Relax Wayne B. there is no need to proceed any further. As a seasoned
sailor you have no credibility. After all, the wench has spoken.

Moose June 16th 10 12:34 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/15/2010 10:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.

Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

Isn't it fun being judged by the queen of the dumpster?

Moose June 16th 10 12:53 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/15/2010 11:40 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.

Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?


You're not my teacher. You're some guy on a newsgroup who claims to
have great knowledge about cruising/anchoring. I asked a
straightforward, honest question.. how do you deal with 100 ft of
chain and big anchor if you can't use a windlass. It seems as though
you'd rather rest on your laurels vs. making a serious attempt to
answer a serious question. I even proposed driving up to above the
anchor, but that doesn't solve the problem of pulling up all that
weight. If you want to answer the question, if you're capable of
answering the question, go for it. Otherwise, you should probably just
admit that you don't have an answer and perhaps take the lesson
yourself and find a solution, since you're actually doing the cruising
and it might come in handy.


The answer is simple. If you can't lift the anchor you must set it free,
with a bouy attached for obvious reasons. Or you could McGiver up one of
the many winches on the sailboat to help lift the anchor.
So sorry that you couldn't figure that out on your own. It wasn't that
tough.


Moose June 16th 10 12:55 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/2010 12:16 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher.


Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.


You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to
answer the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning
experience for you. It's call humility.


You can give a bitch a fish and feed her once or teach her how to fish
and feed her for life.

Harry[_5_] June 16th 10 12:56 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/10 7:53 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/15/2010 11:40 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.

Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?


You're not my teacher. You're some guy on a newsgroup who claims to
have great knowledge about cruising/anchoring. I asked a
straightforward, honest question.. how do you deal with 100 ft of
chain and big anchor if you can't use a windlass. It seems as though
you'd rather rest on your laurels vs. making a serious attempt to
answer a serious question. I even proposed driving up to above the
anchor, but that doesn't solve the problem of pulling up all that
weight. If you want to answer the question, if you're capable of
answering the question, go for it. Otherwise, you should probably just
admit that you don't have an answer and perhaps take the lesson
yourself and find a solution, since you're actually doing the cruising
and it might come in handy.


The answer is simple. If you can't lift the anchor you must set it free,
with a bouy attached for obvious reasons. Or you could McGiver up one of
the many winches on the sailboat to help lift the anchor.
So sorry that you couldn't figure that out on your own. It wasn't that
tough.



Which of the line-handing winches on a sailboat would you use to try to
pull up 100 feet of anchor chain and a large anchor? It's not like you
are in the navy, still, and part of a dumb gang crew of 100 men pressed
into doing the old heave-ho.

The newest piece of gear on most of the larger fishing charter boats in
the Bay almost invariably is the electric anchor windlass, because the
damned things burn out in that sort of constant use.

Harry[_5_] June 16th 10 12:57 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/10 7:55 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 12:16 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher.

Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.


You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to
answer the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning
experience for you. It's call humility.


You can give a bitch a fish and feed her once or teach her how to fish
and feed her for life.



I don't believe anyone asked for the details of your marriage.

Moose June 16th 10 01:03 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/2010 2:25 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Jun 15, 8:45 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message

...



nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:54:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Half a boat length of chain is the recommended minimum. Most
serious
cruisers are using all chain (with a snubber) for a variety of
good
reasons.

Did you get a copy of Chapman's yet ? You'll learn a lot
from it and
get more details than anyone here can provide:

http://www.amazon.com/Chapman-Piloti...Small-Handling

Yes, have a copy though not the latest. So, a 40' boat would
have at
least
20 feet. Seems like with all chain that could get pretty heavy
if you
need
to get it out without a windlass... Seems like picking a good
place
with
(among other things) less likelihood of coral would mean you
wouldn't
need
to have as much use for all chain.

There are a number of ways to pull a heavy anchor and chain
without a
windlass, but a windlass is certainly the preferred way of doing
it.
Most serious cruisers prefer all chain simply because it
provides more
security when anchoring, and when you are living on your boat in
remote places, that counts for a lot. Chain sets faster
because the
catenary effect reduces the angle of pull on the anchor. Chain
offers
a great deal of protection from accidental or intentional
cuts/abrasion. Chain has a very high ultimate breaking strength,
etc., etc.

99 out of 100 international/offshore cruising boats can't be all
wrong. Get the big anchor, get the chain, and get the windlass
unless you intend to spend all of your time in a marina.

Interesting... I'd like to know how you would go about raising an
anchor
with all that chain by hand? I didn't read anything like that so
far. You
can't put the chain on a regular winch right? So, I was thinking you
would have to sail up to just above the anchor, but that's still
a lot of
chain/anchor.

Not saying the cruisers are wrong... obviously they're right. I'm
just
wondering how they do it, esp. in the case of mechanism failure.
That's
the point of being a sailor.. dealing with adversity, etc.

If the windlass fails, you cut and run. I'll bet there are tens of
thousands of anchors on the bottom of the ocean that were stuck
and the
Captain had no other choice.

Really? How much does 100' of chain and a big anchor cost? You're
going to leave it?


What guage of chain and how heavy and what type of an anchor?


No idea. I'd imagine that chain/anchor for a 40' boat would be pretty
significant.

Sounds pretty stupid to me, but you don't own a boat, right? So,
you wouldn't even have a clue.


It is evident you don't own one D'Plume and never will. Especially
anything that would require 100 ft. of chain..


I've said I don't own a boat. I have been to the Carib, where a lot of
chain on a rental boat is pretty common. I bet you own one of the
little putt-putt boats that make a nuisance.


Ahhh I'ts a brand new day, The sun is low on the horizon. The birds are
chirping, and Nom De Plume Has been burning the midnight oil making a
fool of herself.
Hello World.

Moose June 16th 10 01:32 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/2010 7:57 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/16/10 7:55 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 12:16 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher.

Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.

You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to
answer the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning
experience for you. It's call humility.


You can give a bitch a fish and feed her once or teach her how to fish
and feed her for life.



I don't believe anyone asked for the details of your marriage.

No.We were discussing Wayne's failed attempt to get Da Plume to think
and solve problems on her own rather than be spoon fed the answers.
To you, being told what to think and say is a way of life, so I can
understand why you are standing by her decision not to learn.

Harry[_5_] June 16th 10 01:32 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/10 8:32 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 7:57 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/16/10 7:55 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 12:16 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher.

Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.

You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to
answer the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning
experience for you. It's call humility.


You can give a bitch a fish and feed her once or teach her how to fish
and feed her for life.



I don't believe anyone asked for the details of your marriage.

No.We were discussing Wayne's failed attempt to get Da Plume to think
and solve problems on her own rather than be spoon fed the answers.
To you, being told what to think and say is a way of life, so I can
understand why you are standing by her decision not to learn.



W'hine is an arrogant asshole. But your comment does prove my oft-stated
point here, that rec.boats is *not* the place to ask and get answered
serious boating questions. Fortunately, there are some moderated
discussion groups where ****heads like you would be tossed at the first
opportunity.

Moose June 16th 10 01:42 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/2010 7:56 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/16/10 7:53 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/15/2010 11:40 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.

Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your
expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher. You're some guy on a newsgroup who claims to
have great knowledge about cruising/anchoring. I asked a
straightforward, honest question.. how do you deal with 100 ft of
chain and big anchor if you can't use a windlass. It seems as though
you'd rather rest on your laurels vs. making a serious attempt to
answer a serious question. I even proposed driving up to above the
anchor, but that doesn't solve the problem of pulling up all that
weight. If you want to answer the question, if you're capable of
answering the question, go for it. Otherwise, you should probably just
admit that you don't have an answer and perhaps take the lesson
yourself and find a solution, since you're actually doing the cruising
and it might come in handy.


The answer is simple. If you can't lift the anchor you must set it free,
with a bouy attached for obvious reasons. Or you could McGiver up one of
the many winches on the sailboat to help lift the anchor.
So sorry that you couldn't figure that out on your own. It wasn't that
tough.



Which of the line-handing winches on a sailboat would you use to try
to pull up 100 feet of anchor chain and a large anchor? It's not like
you are in the navy, still, and part of a dumb gang crew of 100 men
pressed into doing the old heave-ho.


Does it matter?

The newest piece of gear on most of the larger fishing charter boats
in the Bay almost invariably is the electric anchor windlass, because
the damned things burn out in that sort of constant use.

Anchor windlasses are rated to lift ground tackle, not break it free
from the bottom. You might want to pass this on to your buddies in the
fleet.



Harry[_5_] June 16th 10 01:52 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/10 8:42 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 7:56 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/16/10 7:53 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/15/2010 11:40 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Student exercises have a long and honored tradition within the
educational system. Yours is due by 8:00AM Monday. Non-responders
will receive a failing grade. Extra points awarded for especially
creative solutions and solid attempts at joie de vivre/good humor.

Yep.. you're unable to answer the question. So much for your
expertise.


Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher. You're some guy on a newsgroup who claims to
have great knowledge about cruising/anchoring. I asked a
straightforward, honest question.. how do you deal with 100 ft of
chain and big anchor if you can't use a windlass. It seems as though
you'd rather rest on your laurels vs. making a serious attempt to
answer a serious question. I even proposed driving up to above the
anchor, but that doesn't solve the problem of pulling up all that
weight. If you want to answer the question, if you're capable of
answering the question, go for it. Otherwise, you should probably just
admit that you don't have an answer and perhaps take the lesson
yourself and find a solution, since you're actually doing the cruising
and it might come in handy.


The answer is simple. If you can't lift the anchor you must set it free,
with a bouy attached for obvious reasons. Or you could McGiver up one of
the many winches on the sailboat to help lift the anchor.
So sorry that you couldn't figure that out on your own. It wasn't that
tough.



Which of the line-handing winches on a sailboat would you use to try
to pull up 100 feet of anchor chain and a large anchor? It's not like
you are in the navy, still, and part of a dumb gang crew of 100 men
pressed into doing the old heave-ho.


Does it matter?

The newest piece of gear on most of the larger fishing charter boats
in the Bay almost invariably is the electric anchor windlass, because
the damned things burn out in that sort of constant use.

Anchor windlasses are rated to lift ground tackle, not break it free
from the bottom. You might want to pass this on to your buddies in the
fleet.




D'oh. As usual, you jumped to the wrong conclusion. No wonder we lost in
Vietnam.

Harry[_5_] June 16th 10 01:53 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/10 8:54 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 8:32 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/16/10 8:32 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 7:57 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/16/10 7:55 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 12:16 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher.

Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.

You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to
answer the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning
experience for you. It's call humility.


You can give a bitch a fish and feed her once or teach her how to fish
and feed her for life.


I don't believe anyone asked for the details of your marriage.
No.We were discussing Wayne's failed attempt to get Da Plume to think
and solve problems on her own rather than be spoon fed the answers.
To you, being told what to think and say is a way of life, so I can
understand why you are standing by her decision not to learn.



W'hine is an arrogant asshole. But your comment does prove my
oft-stated point here, that rec.boats is *not* the place to ask and
get answered serious boating questions. Fortunately, there are some
moderated discussion groups where ****heads like you would be tossed
at the first opportunity.

Wayne is a hell of a guy except when he decides to pick on me. :-)
It is fortunate that no one pays attention to your assessments.
Otherwise there would be no one left to discuss things with except you.

Your problem is you "oft-state" too much of non boating garbage. Go ****
yourself..



That instructive video you sent of you trying it and then your wife
trying it wouldn't play on my DVD player...wrong format.

Moose June 16th 10 01:54 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/2010 8:32 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/16/10 8:32 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 7:57 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/16/10 7:55 AM, Moose wrote:
On 6/16/2010 12:16 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher.

Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.

You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to
answer the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning
experience for you. It's call humility.


You can give a bitch a fish and feed her once or teach her how to fish
and feed her for life.


I don't believe anyone asked for the details of your marriage.

No.We were discussing Wayne's failed attempt to get Da Plume to think
and solve problems on her own rather than be spoon fed the answers.
To you, being told what to think and say is a way of life, so I can
understand why you are standing by her decision not to learn.



W'hine is an arrogant asshole. But your comment does prove my
oft-stated point here, that rec.boats is *not* the place to ask and
get answered serious boating questions. Fortunately, there are some
moderated discussion groups where ****heads like you would be tossed
at the first opportunity.

Wayne is a hell of a guy except when he decides to pick on me. :-)
It is fortunate that no one pays attention to your assessments.
Otherwise there would be no one left to discuss things with except you.

Your problem is you "oft-state" too much of non boating garbage. Go ****
yourself..

YukonBound June 16th 10 02:45 PM

anchor question?
 


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher.


Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.


You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to answer
the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning experience for
you. It's call humility.


If you're waiting for a show of humility from some of the 'know it alls' in
here, I hope you brought your lunch.
It'll be a long wait.


Harry[_5_] June 16th 10 02:50 PM

anchor question?
 
On 6/16/10 9:45 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Exactly what is it about a homework assignment that you don't
understand ?

You're not my teacher.

Perhaps not, you need one however.

Assignments are due 8:00 AM Monday.

Creativity counts.

Joie de vivre counts more.

Savoir faire? Priceless.


You really are starting to sound like a jerk. If you're not able to
answer the question, why not just say so. It might be a learning
experience for you. It's call humility.


If you're waiting for a show of humility from some of the 'know it alls'
in here, I hope you brought your lunch.
It'll be a long wait.



W'hine will surely tell us how great he is in his humility. He got that
way by taking the same cruise every year.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com