Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:29:02 GMT, "JamesgangNC"
wrote: I don't agree that there is any future in it. There is no other major industry that is interested in producing large consumer two strokes besides the boating outboard business. You simply can not easily design a two stroke that is going to cleanly burn all the fuel at the entire rpm range. I wasn't there, but I understand that at the dealer's meeting for the E-TEC big engine rollout (about a month or so ago), they compared emissions of an E-TEC 225 to a Honda Civic and the E-TEC showed better overall figures - one in particular carbon monoxide and one other was actually better by a big margin. They did the test in front of everybody at the meeting as I understand it, so it was a live test. Reducing the fuel charge is extremely dangerous to longevity. At the same time advanced flow analysis and engine designs continue to make 4 strokes in cars and motorcylces simpler, more powerful, cleaner, and cheaper to produce. Most of that engineering is directly transferable into 4 stroke outboards at a far lesser cost. The advantage of a full cycle to clean out the combustion products and reload with a fresh charge is hard to beat if you're looking to have a clean burn across the entire rpm range. Well, we'll see. Great discussion topic though. Nice job. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ----------- "Angling may be said to be so like the mathematics that it can never be fully learnt..." Izaak Walton "The Compleat Angler", 1653 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
quietest outboards, some details. | General | |||
Why Ficht failed no1 | General | |||
Why Ficht Failed No 2 (octane, propa speeds, oil dilution) | General | |||
2 or 4 stroke? | General |