| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:48:47 GMT, "JamesgangNC"
wrote: Not taking a position on Karen's usefulness but I have to agree with her position on 2 strokes. There is just far too much established 4 stroke engineering that can be used to make reliable riskfree 4 stroke products. Trying to make a 2 stroke low emission is just not worth it. Doing so negates one of the biggests advantages of a two stroke, it's simplicity. I agree with that, but I don't believe that two stroke technology is dead. I believe, and it's only my opinon, that those who are invested in two stroke technology will make it well worth the while. E-TEC may just be the start. Later, Tom |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| quietest outboards, some details. | General | |||
| Why Ficht failed no1 | General | |||
| Why Ficht Failed No 2 (octane, propa speeds, oil dilution) | General | |||
| 2 or 4 stroke? | General | |||