| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554
While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn’t defend Mr. Trump’s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts to overturn the election. As we’ve written before, Mr. Trump’s behavior was inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time. That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s post-trial remarks. The GOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said the Constitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents while in office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are good arguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the 19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also noted that impeaching a private citizen had no “limiting principle,” and could set a dangerous precedent. .. .. .. Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump’s words and actions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters who had assembled on Jan. 6 at the President’s urging and became a mob. “Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were a disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” Mr. McConnell said. “There’s no question—none—that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day.” He added that the rioters had been “fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth–because he was angry he’d lost an election.” All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump’s failure to act with dispatch to call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
Wayne B Wrote in message:r
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn’tdefend Mr. Trump’s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we’ve written before, Mr. Trump’s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no “limiting principle,” andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump’s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6 at the President’s urging and became a mob.“Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” Mr. McConnell said.“There’s no question—none—that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.”He added that the rioters had been “fed wild falsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth–because he was angry he’d lost an election.”All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump’s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while you are under this spell. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:
Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn’tdefend Mr. Trump’s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we’ve written before, Mr. Trump’s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no “limiting principle,” andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump’s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6 at the President’s urging and became a mob.“Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” Mr. McConnell said.“There’s no question—none—that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.”He added that the rioters had been “fed wild falsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth–because he was angry he’d lost an election.”All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump’s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while you are under this spell. === We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-) I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, and we could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a little advance notice. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 12:32:40 UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn’tdefend Mr. Trump’s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we’ve written before, Mr. Trump’s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no “limiting principle,” andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump’s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6 at the President’s urging and became a mob.“Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” Mr. McConnell said.“There’s no question—none—that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.”He added that the rioters had been “fed wild falsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth–because he was angry he’d lost an election.”All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump’s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while you are under this spell. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Wow...sounds like that would be a major loss to Wayne...SNERK! |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:10:09 -0500, Wayne B
wrote: https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554 While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn’t defend Mr. Trump’s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts to overturn the election. As we’ve written before, Mr. Trump’s behavior was inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time. That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s post-trial remarks. The GOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said the Constitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents while in office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are good arguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the 19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also noted that impeaching a private citizen had no “limiting principle,” and could set a dangerous precedent. . . . Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump’s words and actions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters who had assembled on Jan. 6 at the President’s urging and became a mob. “Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were a disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” Mr. McConnell said. “There’s no question—none—that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day.” He added that the rioters had been “fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth–because he was angry he’d lost an election.” All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump’s failure to act with dispatch to call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Didn't you already say most of that? -- Freedom Isn't Free! |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:10:09 -0500, Wayne B
wrote: https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554 While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn’t defend Mr. Trump’s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts to overturn the election. As we’ve written before, Mr. Trump’s behavior was inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time. That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s post-trial remarks. The GOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said the Constitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents while in office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are good arguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the 19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also noted that impeaching a private citizen had no “limiting principle,” and could set a dangerous precedent. . . . Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump’s words and actions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters who had assembled on Jan. 6 at the President’s urging and became a mob. “Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were a disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” Mr. McConnell said. “There’s no question—none—that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day.” He added that the rioters had been “fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth–because he was angry he’d lost an election.” All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump’s failure to act with dispatch to call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Mitch said what I have been saying all along. If they think they have a criminal case, bring it in federal court and let Trump face justice, good or bad, not a political witch hunt. Since then I am hearing people say you don't need a crime to impeach. If so, why does article II say Section 4. The president, vice president and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Then the quibble words really start to flow. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne B
wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn’tdefend Mr. Trump’s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we’ve written before, Mr. Trump’s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no “limiting principle,” andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump’s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6 at the President’s urging and became a mob.“Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” Mr. McConnell said.“There’s no question—none—that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.”He added that the rioters had been “fed wild falsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth–because he was angry he’d lost an election.”All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump’s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while you are under this spell. === We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-) I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, and we could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a little advance notice. Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet up here, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't vote for either of them. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:
Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limiting principle,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while you are under this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them. i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
Wrote in message:r
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On 2/17/21 8:49 AM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? Justine is expert at keeping himself in the dark. -- Bozo Binned: Herring, Bert Robbins, JackGoff 452471atgmail.com, Just-AN-Asshole, Tim, AMDX, and Gunboy Alex, aka the Gang of Dull, Witless, Insult-Tossing Trumpsters. If you are on this list, I don't see most of your posts and I don't read any of them. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won?t win another national election.
True North Wrote in message:r
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...ndex.htmlMaybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? Nah. I,m so ugly I'd break his phone. You seem to have learned your lesson.I havent seen any pics of you since you started wearing long pants. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
John wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Looks like the person you would expect to be typing the **** that he does. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won?t win another national election.
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:r
On 2/17/21 8:49 AM, True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? Justine is expert at keeping himself in the dark.-- Bozo Binned: Herring, Bert Robbins, JackGoff 452471atgmail.com,Just-AN-Asshole, Tim, AMDX, and Gunboy Alex, aka the Gang of Dull,Witless, Insult-Tossing Trumpsters. If you are on this list, I don't seemost of your posts and I don't read any of them. No offense but you are so offensive that I wouldnt want to imagine what would happen to you if you showed up on my doorstep. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:31:53 UTC-4, Alex wrote:
John wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent.....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Looks like the person you would expect to be typing the **** that he does.. SNERK! That guy looks more like The Johns' age than mine. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:31:53 UTC-4, Alex wrote: John wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Looks like the person you would expect to be typing the **** that he does. SNERK! That guy looks more like The Johns' age than mine. You know exactly who "that guy" is.Â* You posted it, bozo. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won?t win another national election.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:44:52 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:r On 2/17/21 8:49 AM, True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? Justine is expert at keeping himself in the dark.-- Bozo Binned: Herring, Bert Robbins, JackGoff 452471atgmail.com,Just-AN-Asshole, Tim, AMDX, and Gunboy Alex, aka the Gang of Dull,Witless, Insult-Tossing Trumpsters. If you are on this list, I don't seemost of your posts and I don't read any of them. No offense but you are so offensive that I wouldnt want to imagine what would happen to you if you showed up on my doorstep. I suspect that any guy showing up on your doorstep would be subjected to a really bad blow job. |
Wall Street Journal
|
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won?t win another national election.
True North Wrote in message:r
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:31:53 UTC-4, Alex wrote: John wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Looks like the person you would expect to be typing the **** that he does.SNERK!That guy looks more like The Johns' age than mine. Right. He looks like he's probably 50 years older than you. Mentaly anyways. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:55:44 UTC-4, Alex wrote:
True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:31:53 UTC-4, Alex wrote: John wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent.....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Looks like the person you would expect to be typing the **** that he does. SNERK! That guy looks more like The Johns' age than mine. You know exactly who "that guy" is. You posted it, bozo. Would y'all like to put your money where your big mouth is, Bozo? I have a nice crisp 100.00 Canadian bill that I'll put against your Yankee 100.00 bill. We can mail the money to a poster that we both trust and I'll send a current photo of me to that person and he'll be the sole arbitrator of whether The John's photo is me or not. Since you don't trust Harry and I don't trust The John and his Bowl of Turds (no offence) .....that would leave Tim if he is agreeable and if not, Richard or Greg. BTW I know your money is worth more than mine but since you're so sure of yourself, you can give me odds. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent.....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n’t win another national election.
True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. Maybe it up $200 Canadian against the $100 US. Since the looney is worth a lot less, and you declare you did not post that picture. Seems as if remember you posting that link years ago. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t win another national election.
Bill Wrote in message:r
True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. Maybe it up $200 Canadian against the $100 US. Since the looney is worth alot less, and you declare you did not post that picture. Seems as ifremember you posting that link years ago. I don't know if that's him. The face is dumb looking enough and the legs are stubby enough, but they don't appear to be bowed out to the extreme like in the other genuine picture of him standing in front of his little sandpiper sailboat. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t win anothernational election.
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 08:50:59 UTC-4, justan wrote:
Bill Wrote in message:r True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. Maybe it up $200 Canadian against the $100 US. Since the looney is worth alot less, and you declare you did not post that picture. Seems as ifremember you posting that link years ago. I don't know if that's him. The face is dumb looking enough and the legs are stubby enough, but they don't appear to be bowed out to the extreme like in the other genuine picture of him standing in front of his little sandpiper sailboat. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Don't discourage Ditzy Dan or The John. They are so sure it's me. Would you really deny me the great pleasure of spending their money and rubbing it in their noses? |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t winanother national election.
True North Wrote in message:r
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 08:50:59 UTC-4, justan wrote: Bill Wrote in message:r True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. Maybe it up $200 Canadian against the $100 US. Since the looney is worth alot less, and you declare you did not post that picture. Seems as ifremember you posting that link years ago. I don't know if that's him. The face is dumb looking enough and the legs are stubby enough, but they don't appear to be bowed out to the extreme like in the other genuine picture of him standing in front of his little sandpiper sailboat. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlDon't discourage Ditzy Dan or The John. They are so sure it's me.Would you really deny me the great pleasure of spending their money and rubbing it in their noses? YES -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t win anothernational election.
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 10:09:26 UTC-4, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:r On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 08:50:59 UTC-4, justan wrote: Bill Wrote in message:r True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. Maybe it up $200 Canadian against the $100 US. Since the looney is worth alot less, and you declare you did not post that picture. Seems as ifremember you posting that link years ago. I don't know if that's him. The face is dumb looking enough and the legs are stubby enough, but they don't appear to be bowed out to the extreme like in the other genuine picture of him standing in front of his little sandpiper sailboat. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlDon't discourage Ditzy Dan or The John. They are so sure it's me.Would you really deny me the great pleasure of spending their money and rubbing it in their noses? YES -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Im thinking The John probably got that photo from you and you sure as hell know it's fake. Too bad, I was already dreaming what I'd spend the money on. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t winanother national election.
True North Wrote in message:r
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 10:09:26 UTC-4, justan wrote: True North Wrote in message:r On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 08:50:59 UTC-4, justan wrote: Bill Wrote in message:r True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. Maybe it up $200 Canadian against the $100 US. Since the looney is worth alot less, and you declare you did not post that picture. Seems as ifremember you posting that link years ago. I don't know if that's him. The face is dumb looking enough and the legs are stubby enough, but they don't appear to be bowed out to the extreme like in the other genuine picture of him standing in front of his little sandpiper sailboat. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlDon't discourage Ditzy Dan or The John. They are so sure it's me.Would you really deny me the great pleasure of spending their money and rubbing it in their noses? YES -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...t/index.htmlIm thinking The John probably got that photo from you and you sure as hell know it's fake.Too bad, I was already dreaming what I'd spend the money on. Wrong again. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t win anothernational election.
On 2/18/21 9:49 AM, True North wrote:
Im thinking The John probably got that photo from you and you sure as hell know it's fake. Too bad, I was already dreaming what I'd spend the money on. I just don't have the patience for morons like Justine anymore. -- Bozo Binned: Herring, Bert Robbins, JackGoff 452471atgmail.com, Just-AN-Asshole, Tim, AMDX, and Gunboy Alex, aka the Gang of Dull, Witless, Insult-Tossing Trumpsters. If you are on this list, I don't see most of your posts and I don't read any of them. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t winanother national election.
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/18/21 9:49 AM, True North wrote: Im thinking The John probably got that photo from you and you sure as hell know it's fake. Too bad, I was already dreaming what I'd spend the money on. I just don't have the patience for morons like Justine anymore. Translation: You don’t have any payday lenders that will loan you money to bet. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t winanother national election.
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:r
On 2/18/21 9:49 AM, True North wrote: Im thinking The John probably got that photo from you and you sure as hell know it's fake. Too bad, I was already dreaming what I'd spend the money on. I just don't have the patience for morons like Justine anymore.-- Bozo Binned: Herring, Bert Robbins, JackGoff 452471atgmail.com,Just-AN-Asshole, Tim, AMDX, and Gunboy Alex, aka the Gang of Dull,Witless, Insult-Tossing Trumpsters. If you are on this list, I don't seemost of your posts and I don't read any of them. You hurt my feelings but I'll get over it. Whoops, already over it. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t win another national election.
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:50:02 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:r On 2/18/21 9:49 AM, True North wrote: Im thinking The John probably got that photo from you and you sure as hell know it's fake. Too bad, I was already dreaming what I'd spend the money on. I just don't have the patience for morons like Justine anymore.-- Bozo Binned: Herring, Bert Robbins, JackGoff 452471atgmail.com,Just-AN-Asshole, Tim, AMDX, and Gunboy Alex, aka the Gang of Dull,Witless, Insult-Tossing Trumpsters. If you are on this list, I don't seemost of your posts and I don't read any of them. You hurt my feelings but I'll get someone to stick it in my butt. Maybe Billy? |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:55:44 UTC-4, Alex wrote: True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:31:53 UTC-4, Alex wrote: John wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Looks like the person you would expect to be typing the **** that he does. SNERK! That guy looks more like The Johns' age than mine. You know exactly who "that guy" is. You posted it, bozo. Would y'all like to put your money where your big mouth is, Bozo? I have a nice crisp 100.00 Canadian bill that I'll put against your Yankee 100.00 bill. We can mail the money to a poster that we both trust and I'll send a current photo of me to that person and he'll be the sole arbitrator of whether The John's photo is me or not. Since you don't trust Harry and I don't trust The John and his Bowl of Turds (no offence) .....that would leave Tim if he is agreeable and if not, Richard or Greg. BTW I know your money is worth more than mine but since you're so sure of yourself, you can give me odds. Is the bet that you didn't post the photo or it's not you?Â* You did post it so you must know who that guy is. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. You know damn well you posted it.Â* Not on purpose, but you are too dumb to post a single photo so you shared your whole portfolio. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 20:58:10 UTC-4, Alex wrote:
True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:55:44 UTC-4, Alex wrote: True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 20:31:53 UTC-4, Alex wrote: John wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Looks like the person you would expect to be typing the **** that he does. SNERK! That guy looks more like The Johns' age than mine. You know exactly who "that guy" is. You posted it, bozo. Would y'all like to put your money where your big mouth is, Bozo? I have a nice crisp 100.00 Canadian bill that I'll put against your Yankee 100.00 bill. We can mail the money to a poster that we both trust and I'll send a current photo of me to that person and he'll be the sole arbitrator of whether The John's photo is me or not. Since you don't trust Harry and I don't trust The John and his Bowl of Turds (no offence) .....that would leave Tim if he is agreeable and if not, Richard or Greg. BTW I know your money is worth more than mine but since you're so sure of yourself, you can give me odds. Is the bet that you didn't post the photo or it's not you? You did post it so you must know who that guy is. Are you on crack? I have no idea who this person is. You say I posted the photo....where and when? Where is the rest of the photo and why is the quality so poor? As I stated the photo is not of me. Are you chickening out? Cluck cluck cluck. $100.00 should be chump change to a self proclaimed big shot like y'all and you sure as 'ell must be used to losing by now. What with Trumpty Dumpty getting his ass handed to him, Limbaugh taking a dirt nap etc. One more loss shouldn't bother you and it certainly would brighten my day. |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:30:54 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in your neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. Don't get bent out of shape, Donnie. I think you're much cuter in this one anyway! https://funkyimg.com/i/3aHGN.jpg But, if I were you I still wouldn't think about getting on a motorcycle. Although, the Honda Monkey might work: https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/...11551a92.jp g -- Freedom Isn't Free! |
Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he wo n?t win another national election.
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:07:58 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote: On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 08:50:59 UTC-4, justan wrote: Bill Wrote in message:r True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 21:14:24 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:48:10 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 12:25:26 UTC-4, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:49:52 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 08:59:40 UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:05:56 -0500 (EST), justan Wrote in message:r On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:47:06 -0500, Wayne wrote:On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:32:38 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:Wayne B Wrote in message:r https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn?tdefend Mr. Trump?s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts tooverturn the election. As we?ve written before, Mr. Trump?s behaviorwas inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.That wasthe essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell?s post-trial remarks. TheGOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said theConstitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents whilein office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are goodarguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing ofthe19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also notedthat impeaching a private citizen had no ?limitingprinciple,? andcould set a dangerous precedent....Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump?s words andactions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters whohad assembled on Jan. 6at thePresident?s urging and became a mob.?Former President Trump?s actions that preceded the riot were adisgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,? Mr. McConnell said.?There?s no question?none?that President Trump is practically andmorally responsible for provoking the events of the day.?He added that the rioters had been ?fed wildfalsehoods by the mostpowerful man on Earth?because he was angry he?d lost an election.?All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump?s failure to act with dispatchto call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Wayne Wayne Wayne...Trump had no control over the many factions which comprised that sea of souls at the Capital. I'll be in neighborhood soon but I'm not sure I could have a civil conversation with you while youareunder this spell.===We'd no doubt have to agree not to talk politics. :-)I'm capable if you are. Weather here is near perfect right now, andwe could probably round up Greg for a beer or lunch with a littleadvance notice.Sure I would like to get out of the house or you folks could meet uphere, sort of neutral ground, since I am a Loonytarian who didn't votefor either of them.i sent you our itinerary. I am not sure where that is. Just a little ways from you. Aparently you got my note. I like to keep Fat Harry and any other spooky individuals in the dark. You never know whos lurking on the internets. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Maybe Greg can take a photo and post on this group. Neither he nor Wayne have anything to hide. How about you? How about you? https://funkyimg.com/i/3aSnG.jpg I'm thinking you better stay away from motorcycles! -- Freedom Isn't Free! Who is that supposed to be, JohnnyMop? If it's supposed to be me, y'all better find a new investigator. You're the one posted it, not me! -- Freedom Isn't Free! When or where did I post that photo, JohnnyMop? Maybe you'd like to take me up on the same bet I offered Ditzy Dan Kruger. And yes, I would trust your good friend Tim. I'm a good judge of character and know he'll give it an honest assessment. Maybe it up $200 Canadian against the $100 US. Since the looney is worth alot less, and you declare you did not post that picture. Seems as ifremember you posting that link years ago. I don't know if that's him. The face is dumb looking enough and the legs are stubby enough, but they don't appear to be bowed out to the extreme like in the other genuine picture of him standing in front of his little sandpiper sailboat. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazon...net/index.html Don't discourage Ditzy Dan or The John. They are so sure it's me. Would you really deny me the great pleasure of spending their money and rubbing it in their noses? Did I say it was you? I simply asked you a question, "How about you?", and posted a picture. Then you go ape ****. -- Freedom Isn't Free! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com