LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Wall Street Journal: He may run again, but he won’t win another national election.

On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:10:09 -0500, Wayne B
wrote:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554

While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didn’t
defend Mr. Trump’s words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts to
overturn the election. As we’ve written before, Mr. Trump’s behavior
was inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.

That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s post-trial remarks. The
GOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said the
Constitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents while
in office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are good
arguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the
19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also noted
that impeaching a private citizen had no “limiting principle,” and
could set a dangerous precedent.
.
.
.
Mr. McConnell was lacerating in his criticism of Mr. Trump’s words and
actions, which he blamed for deceiving and motivating supporters who
had assembled on Jan. 6 at the President’s urging and became a mob.
“Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were a
disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” Mr. McConnell said.
“There’s no question—none—that President Trump is practically and
morally responsible for provoking the events of the day.”

He added that the rioters had been “fed wild falsehoods by the most
powerful man on Earth–because he was angry he’d lost an election.”

All of this was compounded by Mr. Trump’s failure to act with dispatch
to call off the rioters once he heard what was happening.


Mitch said what I have been saying all along. If they think they have
a criminal case, bring it in federal court and let Trump face justice,
good or bad, not a political witch hunt.
Since then I am hearing people say you don't need a crime to impeach.
If so, why does article II say

Section 4. The president, vice president and all civil officers of the
United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and
conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and
misdemeanors.

Then the quibble words really start to flow.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good Covid news from the Wall Street Journal Wayne B General 47 February 18th 21 05:03 PM
GOP's Wall Street Journal blasts McCain...again. Arrrrgh! General 0 September 19th 08 09:51 PM
Wall Street Journal sez: hk General 0 August 10th 08 05:33 PM
As seen on Oprah, 20/20, the Wall Street Journal [email protected] General 1 August 8th 07 02:27 PM
Wall Street Journal on Mari-Cha IV Auerbach Boat Building 1 May 26th 05 06:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017