Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:50 -0500, wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...001809503.html === Bloomberg continued, “But seriously. somebody’s gotta stand up and do what we need. A healthy banking system that’s going to take risks because that’s what creates the jobs for everybody. And nobody’s willing to say that. The trouble is, these campaigns in this day and age, really are about slogans and not about issues anymore." And he's right of course, but not a popular message. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/26/2020 9:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:50 -0500, wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...001809503.html === Bloomberg continued, “But seriously. somebody’s gotta stand up and do what we need. A healthy banking system that’s going to take risks because that’s what creates the jobs for everybody. And nobody’s willing to say that. The trouble is, these campaigns in this day and age, really are about slogans and not about issues anymore." And he's right of course, but not a popular message. My limited experience with banks is that they do *not* take risks unless they are forced to (by the feds) as in the sub-prime loans that led to the economic collapse of home loans in 2008. My experiences are limited, I recognize, but I've never seen a bank take a *risk*, either in personal loans, mortgages or in business. The loans are always backed by some form of collateral. Financial risk takers are private investors, venture capital firms, etc. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/26/2020 9:38 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/26/20 9:31 AM, wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:50 -0500, wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...001809503.html === Bloomberg continued, “But seriously. somebody’s gotta stand up and do what we need. A healthy banking system that’s going to take risks because that’s what creates the jobs for everybody. And nobody’s willing to say that. The trouble is, these campaigns in this day and age, really are about slogans and not about issues anymore." And he's right of course, but not a popular message. There are plenty of serious issues being discussed seriously on the Democratic side and, on the Republican side, there is Donald Trump telling us the Corona virus will fade away shortly and that a vaccine is really close, except the experts are saying it is a year to 18 months away. Yep, it sure didn't take too long for the Dems to organize their talking points and start blaming Trump for the Coronavirus. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/26/20 9:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2020 9:38 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/26/20 9:31 AM, wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:50 -0500, wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...001809503.html === Bloomberg continued, “But seriously. somebody’s gotta stand up and do what we need. A healthy banking system that’s going to take risks because that’s what creates the jobs for everybody. And nobody’s willing to say that. The trouble is, these campaigns in this day and age, really are about slogans and not about issues anymore." And he's right of course, but not a popular message. There are plenty of serious issues being discussed seriously on the Democratic side and, on the Republican side, there is Donald Trump telling us the Corona virus will fade away shortly and that a vaccine is really close, except the experts are saying it is a year to 18 months away. Yep, it sure didn't take too long for the Dems to organize their talking points and start blaming Trump for the Coronavirus. I haven't heard or seen anyone *blaming* the Moron for the virus, but he sure cut back on the people and departments who are supposed to handle the issues related to protecting us from it and he making idiotic, non-science based remarks about it "disappearing" and the near availability of a vaccine, and these remarks are utter nonsense. Your guy. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/26/2020 9:54 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/26/20 9:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:38 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/26/20 9:31 AM, wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:50 -0500, wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...001809503.html === Bloomberg continued, “But seriously. somebody’s gotta stand up and do what we need. A healthy banking system that’s going to take risks because that’s what creates the jobs for everybody. And nobody’s willing to say that. The trouble is, these campaigns in this day and age, really are about slogans and not about issues anymore." And he's right of course, but not a popular message. There are plenty of serious issues being discussed seriously on the Democratic side and, on the Republican side, there is Donald Trump telling us the Corona virus will fade away shortly and that a vaccine is really close, except the experts are saying it is a year to 18 months away. Yep, it sure didn't take too long for the Dems to organize their talking points and start blaming Trump for the Coronavirus. I haven't heard or seen anyone *blaming* the Moron for the virus, but he sure cut back on the people and departments who are supposed to handle the issues related to protecting us from it and he making idiotic, non-science based remarks about it "disappearing" and the near availability of a vaccine, and these remarks are utter nonsense. Your guy. Sure. Could be he's trying to prevent panic until the real scope of the threat is determined. Doesn't help with that slime-ball, Chuck Schumer heading for the first open microphone to denounce Trump and his administration and raising anxieties purely for political advantage. As Trump said, if he had requested *more* money from Congress, Schumer and the Dems would be saying it was too much. As it turns out, he and the Dems are claiming Trump's initial request was too little. Lost in the whole pigsty of politics was the fact that Trump's request was for an initial funding. If need be, he acknowledged we may need more. Of course, if Congress thinks the initial request for funding isn't enough, they are free to authorize more ... without Trump asking. It's pure BS politics again. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:43:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:31 AM, wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:50 -0500, wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...001809503.html === Bloomberg continued, “But seriously. somebody’s gotta stand up and do what we need. A healthy banking system that’s going to take risks because that’s what creates the jobs for everybody. And nobody’s willing to say that. The trouble is, these campaigns in this day and age, really are about slogans and not about issues anymore." And he's right of course, but not a popular message. My limited experience with banks is that they do *not* take risks unless they are forced to (by the feds) as in the sub-prime loans that led to the economic collapse of home loans in 2008. My experiences are limited, I recognize, but I've never seen a bank take a *risk*, either in personal loans, mortgages or in business. The loans are always backed by some form of collateral. Financial risk takers are private investors, venture capital firms, etc. The problems started with the banks when Clinton signed the law repealing Glass Steagall in 1999 and allowed the banks to become like venture capital firms and stock brokers. Then they were gambling with their depositor's money. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:46:44 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:38 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/26/20 9:31 AM, wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:50 -0500, wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...001809503.html === Bloomberg continued, “But seriously. somebody’s gotta stand up and do what we need. A healthy banking system that’s going to take risks because that’s what creates the jobs for everybody. And nobody’s willing to say that. The trouble is, these campaigns in this day and age, really are about slogans and not about issues anymore." And he's right of course, but not a popular message. There are plenty of serious issues being discussed seriously on the Democratic side and, on the Republican side, there is Donald Trump telling us the Corona virus will fade away shortly and that a vaccine is really close, except the experts are saying it is a year to 18 months away. Yep, it sure didn't take too long for the Dems to organize their talking points and start blaming Trump for the Coronavirus. If the damned Chinese would stop sleeping with the pigs they eat we would avoid a lot of these viruses. Virtually every one in the last 50 years has come out of China and was traced back to livestock. Hey Dung Poo, wash your hands after you hug your pig. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:12:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:54 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/26/20 9:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:38 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/26/20 9:31 AM, wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:50 -0500, wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...001809503.html === Bloomberg continued, “But seriously. somebody’s gotta stand up and do what we need. A healthy banking system that’s going to take risks because that’s what creates the jobs for everybody. And nobody’s willing to say that. The trouble is, these campaigns in this day and age, really are about slogans and not about issues anymore." And he's right of course, but not a popular message. There are plenty of serious issues being discussed seriously on the Democratic side and, on the Republican side, there is Donald Trump telling us the Corona virus will fade away shortly and that a vaccine is really close, except the experts are saying it is a year to 18 months away. Yep, it sure didn't take too long for the Dems to organize their talking points and start blaming Trump for the Coronavirus. I haven't heard or seen anyone *blaming* the Moron for the virus, but he sure cut back on the people and departments who are supposed to handle the issues related to protecting us from it and he making idiotic, non-science based remarks about it "disappearing" and the near availability of a vaccine, and these remarks are utter nonsense. Your guy. Sure. Could be he's trying to prevent panic until the real scope of the threat is determined. Doesn't help with that slime-ball, Chuck Schumer heading for the first open microphone to denounce Trump and his administration and raising anxieties purely for political advantage. As Trump said, if he had requested *more* money from Congress, Schumer and the Dems would be saying it was too much. As it turns out, he and the Dems are claiming Trump's initial request was too little. Lost in the whole pigsty of politics was the fact that Trump's request was for an initial funding. If need be, he acknowledged we may need more. Of course, if Congress thinks the initial request for funding isn't enough, they are free to authorize more ... without Trump asking. It's pure BS politics again. They don't want to admit, the immediate "fix" is to have tighter border screening. The Dems want open borders. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Even Bloomberg says it's better... | General | |||
Bloomberg is a piece of crap... | General | |||
John can't remember houses, Cindy can't remember sisters. | General | |||
Guys, remember spontoon boy. Remember Burnt Njall. | General |