LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,650
Default Nuclear Fusion

On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:47:10 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:57:37 -0500,

wrote:

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:14:58 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Interesting article. Looks promising.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46219656


===

It does sound promising but workable fusion has been anywhere from 5
to 30 years away for a long time.


That is the way I see it. We are damned good at an uncontrolled fusion
reaction tho.
We understand how to start them up. We just don't know how to do it in
a bottle. The problems make disposing of some spent fuel rods seem
trivial compared to fusion without blowing up the city if the plasma
gets away from you.


===

There's always a risk with things that are not well understood, but
everything we know at present says that the plasma will die if it is
not magnetically confined.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nuclear NIMBY Harry[_2_] General 1 February 1st 10 09:39 PM
Repugs to “go nuclear” Cliff General 0 April 19th 09 06:31 AM
Repugs to “go nuclear” Tim General 2 April 11th 09 02:25 PM
Nuclear Proliferation Gilligan ASA 10 November 16th 06 10:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017