On 11/6/18 8:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 8:47 AM, Tim wrote:

May the worse candidate lose.


I have a meeting to attend this morning but I'll go vote after it's over.

For me it's really a waste of time except for governor. The incumbent
running for re-election is a Republican.

Latest odds here says Warren has a 99 out of 100 chance of being
re-elected.Â* Her closest Republican opponent's chances of winning
is less than 1 out of 100 as is the third party candidate.






No local/House of Representative elections in your area, eh?

We have a couple of local issues plus a bunch of local office candidates
in addition to the U.S. Senate, House, and governor's race.

On 11/6/2018 10:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/6/18 8:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 8:47 AM, Tim wrote:

May the worse candidate lose.


I have a meeting to attend this morning but I'll go vote after it's over.

For me it's really a waste of time except for governor. The incumbent
running for re-election is a Republican.

Latest odds here says Warren has a 99 out of 100 chance of being
re-elected.Â* Her closest Republican opponent's chances of winning
is less than 1 out of 100 as is the third party candidate.






No local/House of Representative elections in your area, eh?

We have a couple of local issues plus a bunch of local office candidates
in addition to the U.S. Senate, House, and governor's race.


If you read the names on the ballot the incumbents are at least 80%
Democrats.

Why bother?

On 11/6/18 12:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 10:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/6/18 8:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 8:47 AM, Tim wrote:

May the worse candidate lose.


I have a meeting to attend this morning but I'll go vote after it's
over.

For me it's really a waste of time except for governor. The incumbent
running for re-election is a Republican.

Latest odds here says Warren has a 99 out of 100 chance of being
re-elected.Â* Her closest Republican opponent's chances of winning
is less than 1 out of 100 as is the third party candidate.






No local/House of Representative elections in your area, eh?

We have a couple of local issues plus a bunch of local office
candidates in addition to the U.S. Senate, House, and governor's race.


If you read the names on the ballot the incumbents are at least 80%
Democrats.

Why bother?



Oh, I suppose that works for you. I just voted straight Dem...which is
unusual for me. I see no reason to support anyone in the party of POTUS
Pig Vomit.

On 11/6/2018 1:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/6/18 12:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 10:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/6/18 8:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 8:47 AM, Tim wrote:

May the worse candidate lose.


I have a meeting to attend this morning but I'll go vote after it's
over.

For me it's really a waste of time except for governor. The
incumbent running for re-election is a Republican.

Latest odds here says Warren has a 99 out of 100 chance of being
re-elected.Â* Her closest Republican opponent's chances of winning
is less than 1 out of 100 as is the third party candidate.






No local/House of Representative elections in your area, eh?

We have a couple of local issues plus a bunch of local office
candidates in addition to the U.S. Senate, House, and governor's race.


If you read the names on the ballot the incumbents are at least 80%
Democrats.

Why bother?



Oh, I suppose that works for you. I just voted straight Dem...which is
unusual for me. I see no reason to support anyone in the party of POTUS
Pig Vomit.


I get a kick out of some of the comments on elections in various states.
Heard a political pundit the other day discussing the senate election
in New Jersey. He said voters should just hold their nose and vote
for Bob Menendez. The pundit was a Democrat.

On 11/6/18 1:36 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 1:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/6/18 12:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 10:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/6/18 8:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 8:47 AM, Tim wrote:

May the worse candidate lose.


I have a meeting to attend this morning but I'll go vote after it's
over.

For me it's really a waste of time except for governor. The
incumbent running for re-election is a Republican.

Latest odds here says Warren has a 99 out of 100 chance of being
re-elected.Â* Her closest Republican opponent's chances of winning
is less than 1 out of 100 as is the third party candidate.






No local/House of Representative elections in your area, eh?

We have a couple of local issues plus a bunch of local office
candidates in addition to the U.S. Senate, House, and governor's race.


If you read the names on the ballot the incumbents are at least 80%
Democrats.

Why bother?



Oh, I suppose that works for you. I just voted straight Dem...which is
unusual for me. I see no reason to support anyone in the party of
POTUS Pig Vomit.


I get a kick out of some of the comments on elections in various states.
Heard a political pundit the other day discussing the senate election
in New Jersey.Â* He said voters should just hold their nose and vote
for Bob Menendez.Â*Â* The pundit was a Democrat.



Makes perfect sense...no reasons to support a candidate who will back
Trump.

Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Oh, I suppose that works for you. I just voted straight Dem...which is
unusual for me. I see no reason to support anyone in the party of POTUS
Pig Vomit.

..........

So much for the republican sheriff you admire. Did he run out of favors to give you?

On 11/6/18 1:37 PM, Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Oh, I suppose that works for you. I just voted straight Dem...which is
unusual for me. I see no reason to support anyone in the party of POTUS
Pig Vomit.

.........

So much for the republican sheriff you admire. Did he run out of favors to give you?


As I was working my way through and marking my paper ballot, I was
trying to decide what to do about him. In the end, I couldn't force
myself to vote for him. Trump and his enablers have poisoned politics.

On 11/6/2018 1:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/6/18 1:37 PM, Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Oh, I suppose that works for you. I just voted straight Dem...which is
unusual for me. I see no reason to support anyone in the party of POTUS
Pig Vomit.

.........

So much for the republican sheriff you admire.Â* Did he run out of
favors to give you?


As I was working my way through and marking my paper ballot, I was
trying to decide what to do about him. In the end, I couldn't force
myself to vote for him. Trump and his enablers have poisoned politics.


I had exactly the same thought process as I worked my way through
marking my paper ballot. Normally I vote for some Democrats if I think
he or she is competent and would do a better job than any of their
opponents.

But, not this time. I couldn't force myself to vote for *any* Democrat.
As representatives of a lock-step party intent in their desire for
power at the expense of the ignoring the jobs they were elected to do,
they have poisoned politics for some time to come
in my mind.

On 11/6/2018 2:05 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 1:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/6/18 1:37 PM, Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Oh, I suppose that works for you. I just voted straight Dem...which is
unusual for me. I see no reason to support anyone in the party of POTUS
Pig Vomit.

.........

So much for the republican sheriff you admire.Â* Did he run out of
favors to give you?


As I was working my way through and marking my paper ballot, I was
trying to decide what to do about him. In the end, I couldn't force
myself to vote for him. Trump and his enablers have poisoned politics.


I had exactly the same thought process as I worked my way through
marking my paper ballot.Â*Â* Normally I vote for some Democrats if I think
he or she is competent and would do a better job than any of their
opponents.

But, not this time.Â* I couldn't force myself to vote for *any* Democrat.
As representatives of aÂ* lock-step party intent in their desire for
power at the expense of the ignoring the jobs they wereÂ* elected to do,
they have poisoned politics for some time to come
in my mind.


BTW Harry, I admit that in a small way you contributed to my feelings
about voting for any Democrats this time around. When I saw a "D"
beside their name I briefly thought of all the crap you sprew here and
my marker automatically moved over to fill in the "R" oval.

Thanks for all your hard work.

On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:03:25 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 11/6/18 8:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2018 8:47 AM, Tim wrote:

May the worse candidate lose.


I have a meeting to attend this morning but I'll go vote after it's over.

For me it's really a waste of time except for governor. The incumbent
running for re-election is a Republican.

Latest odds here says Warren has a 99 out of 100 chance of being
re-elected.Â* Her closest Republican opponent's chances of winning
is less than 1 out of 100 as is the third party candidate.






No local/House of Representative elections in your area, eh?

We have a couple of local issues plus a bunch of local office candidates
in addition to the U.S. Senate, House, and governor's race.

The biggest things here are probably the dozens of constitutional
amendments they rolled up into 13 ballot initiatives.

They put things like offshore drilling and "vaping" on the same vote.
There is one they are selling as banning dog racing that is so broadly
worded that they might have to close all the zoos and stop raising
animals for food are anything else. We already passed an amendment
years ago that gives baby pigs more rights than people.

Personally I think giving the voters this easy an access to the
constitution is stupid. It only takes a ridiculously low, unverified,
number of signatures on a petition to get ballot access.