| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
|
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:35:36 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:23 PM, wrote: On 4 Oct 2018 20:52:05 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:30:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Your statement that psychologists can work without a license really just depends on what state they are in. Once again, your educational limitations exceed your reach. If you are not practicing, you do not need a license. "Work" is a term that opens the door to many rooms, and in the case of psychologists, those rooms do not have to involve working as a therapist. If you are saying they can help design ad campaigns to appeal to a certain demographic, you are right but if they are seeing patients in Florida they need some kind of a license, even if they are just bar tenders or hair dressers. I've posted several times that if you are not seeing patients, you do not need a license. It does call into question how you work being a psychologist if you are not seeing patients. What are you doing? Cleaning the office? Answering the phone? Your raising that question once again demonstrates your ignorance and disdain for academic study. How can you do an accredited academic study as a psychologist if not dealing with patients? Harry just got caught being wrong again and he is trying to tap dance his way out of it ... again. The M.O. is the usual one, insult and diversion. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
On 10/4/18 8:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:35:36 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:23 PM, wrote: On 4 Oct 2018 20:52:05 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:30:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Your statement that psychologists can work without a license really just depends on what state they are in. Once again, your educational limitations exceed your reach. If you are not practicing, you do not need a license. "Work" is a term that opens the door to many rooms, and in the case of psychologists, those rooms do not have to involve working as a therapist. If you are saying they can help design ad campaigns to appeal to a certain demographic, you are right but if they are seeing patients in Florida they need some kind of a license, even if they are just bar tenders or hair dressers. I've posted several times that if you are not seeing patients, you do not need a license. It does call into question how you work being a psychologist if you are not seeing patients. What are you doing? Cleaning the office? Answering the phone? Your raising that question once again demonstrates your ignorance and disdain for academic study. How can you do an accredited academic study as a psychologist if not dealing with patients? Harry just got caught being wrong again and he is trying to tap dance his way out of it ... again. The M.O. is the usual one, insult and diversion. Psychologists have professional employment opportunities that have nothing to do with treating patients and if they are engaged in those sorts of activities, there is no need in many of those fields to be licensed. That you and others here are unaware of that is a reflection of your ignorance and intellectual laziness. Just to pick two examples, in many states, industrial and organizational psychologists do not have to be licensed. If they are not engaged in individual or group practice on the side, professors of psychology typically don't have to be licensed in psychology. How do you do an accredited academic psychology study if you are not licensed? Let's say your dissertation involves surveying attitudes towards X, Y, or Z, and you design the survey, pick the audience, mail the survey to recipients, get the completed surveys back, code the results and analyze them. You typically need academic credentials to have the survey accepted, but you don't have to be licensed. And once again, Fretwell, you have demonstrated why it makes no sense to "debate" you. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 8:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:35:36 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:23 PM, wrote: On 4 Oct 2018 20:52:05 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:30:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Your statement that psychologists can work without a license really just depends on what state they are in. Once again, your educational limitations exceed your reach. If you are not practicing, you do not need a license. "Work" is a term that opens the door to many rooms, and in the case of psychologists, those rooms do not have to involve working as a therapist. If you are saying they can help design ad campaigns to appeal to a certain demographic, you are right but if they are seeing patients in Florida they need some kind of a license, even if they are just bar tenders or hair dressers. I've posted several times that if you are not seeing patients, you do not need a license. It does call into question how you work being a psychologist if you are not seeing patients. What are you doing? Cleaning the office? Answering the phone? Your raising that question once again demonstrates your ignorance and disdain for academic study. How can you do an accredited academic study as a psychologist if not dealing with patients? Harry just got caught being wrong again and he is trying to tap dance his way out of it ... again. The M.O. is the usual one, insult and diversion. Psychologists have professional employment opportunities that have nothing to do with treating patients and if they are engaged in those sorts of activities, there is no need in many of those fields to be licensed. That you and others here are unaware of that is a reflection of your ignorance and intellectual laziness. Just to pick two examples, in many states, industrial and organizational psychologists do not have to be licensed. If they are not engaged in individual or group practice on the side, professors of psychology typically don't have to be licensed in psychology. How do you do an accredited academic psychology study if you are not licensed? Let's say your dissertation involves surveying attitudes towards X, Y, or Z, and you design the survey, pick the audience, mail the survey to recipients, get the completed surveys back, code the results and analyze them. You typically need academic credentials to have the survey accepted, but you don't have to be licensed. And once again, Fretwell, you have demonstrated why it makes no sense to "debate" you. I think you are afraid to bump heads with Greg. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 8:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:35:36 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:23 PM, wrote: On 4 Oct 2018 20:52:05 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:30:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Your statement that psychologists can work without a license really just depends on what state they are in. Once again, your educational limitations exceed your reach. If you are not practicing, you do not need a license. "Work" is a term that opens the door to many rooms, and in the case of psychologists, those rooms do not have to involve working as a therapist. If you are saying they can help design ad campaigns to appeal to a certain demographic, you are right but if they are seeing patients in Florida they need some kind of a license, even if they are just bar tenders or hair dressers. I've posted several times that if you are not seeing patients, you do not need a license. It does call into question how you work being a psychologist if you are not seeing patients. What are you doing? Cleaning the office? Answering the phone? Your raising that question once again demonstrates your ignorance and disdain for academic study. How can you do an accredited academic study as a psychologist if not dealing with patients? Harry just got caught being wrong again and he is trying to tap dance his way out of it ... again. The M.O. is the usual one, insult and diversion. Psychologists have professional employment opportunities that have nothing to do with treating patients and if they are engaged in those sorts of activities, there is no need in many of those fields to be licensed. That you and others here are unaware of that is a reflection of your ignorance and intellectual laziness. Just to pick two examples, in many states, industrial and organizational psychologists do not have to be licensed. If they are not engaged in individual or group practice on the side, professors of psychology typically don't have to be licensed in psychology. How do you do an accredited academic psychology study if you are not licensed? Let's say your dissertation involves surveying attitudes towards X, Y, or Z, and you design the survey, pick the audience, mail the survey to recipients, get the completed surveys back, code the results and analyze them. You typically need academic credentials to have the survey accepted, but you don't have to be licensed. And once again, Fretwell, you have demonstrated why it makes no sense to "debate" you. Your answer regards someone working on a psychology degree, not a psychologist. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 01:08:44 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 8:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:35:36 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:23 PM, wrote: On 4 Oct 2018 20:52:05 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:30:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Your statement that psychologists can work without a license really just depends on what state they are in. Once again, your educational limitations exceed your reach. If you are not practicing, you do not need a license. "Work" is a term that opens the door to many rooms, and in the case of psychologists, those rooms do not have to involve working as a therapist. If you are saying they can help design ad campaigns to appeal to a certain demographic, you are right but if they are seeing patients in Florida they need some kind of a license, even if they are just bar tenders or hair dressers. I've posted several times that if you are not seeing patients, you do not need a license. It does call into question how you work being a psychologist if you are not seeing patients. What are you doing? Cleaning the office? Answering the phone? Your raising that question once again demonstrates your ignorance and disdain for academic study. How can you do an accredited academic study as a psychologist if not dealing with patients? Harry just got caught being wrong again and he is trying to tap dance his way out of it ... again. The M.O. is the usual one, insult and diversion. Psychologists have professional employment opportunities that have nothing to do with treating patients and if they are engaged in those sorts of activities, there is no need in many of those fields to be licensed. That you and others here are unaware of that is a reflection of your ignorance and intellectual laziness. Just to pick two examples, in many states, industrial and organizational psychologists do not have to be licensed. If they are not engaged in individual or group practice on the side, professors of psychology typically don't have to be licensed in psychology. How do you do an accredited academic psychology study if you are not licensed? Let's say your dissertation involves surveying attitudes towards X, Y, or Z, and you design the survey, pick the audience, mail the survey to recipients, get the completed surveys back, code the results and analyze them. You typically need academic credentials to have the survey accepted, but you don't have to be licensed. And once again, Fretwell, you have demonstrated why it makes no sense to "debate" you. Your answer regards someone working on a psychology degree, not a psychologist. Exactly. People can parlay a psychology degree into lots of things but a distressing number of them are analyzing people by how they order their Venti Iced Pumpkin Spice Chai Latte at Starbucks. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 01:08:44 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 8:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:35:36 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:23 PM, wrote: On 4 Oct 2018 20:52:05 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:30:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Your statement that psychologists can work without a license really just depends on what state they are in. Once again, your educational limitations exceed your reach. If you are not practicing, you do not need a license. "Work" is a term that opens the door to many rooms, and in the case of psychologists, those rooms do not have to involve working as a therapist. If you are saying they can help design ad campaigns to appeal to a certain demographic, you are right but if they are seeing patients in Florida they need some kind of a license, even if they are just bar tenders or hair dressers. I've posted several times that if you are not seeing patients, you do not need a license. It does call into question how you work being a psychologist if you are not seeing patients. What are you doing? Cleaning the office? Answering the phone? Your raising that question once again demonstrates your ignorance and disdain for academic study. How can you do an accredited academic study as a psychologist if not dealing with patients? Harry just got caught being wrong again and he is trying to tap dance his way out of it ... again. The M.O. is the usual one, insult and diversion. Psychologists have professional employment opportunities that have nothing to do with treating patients and if they are engaged in those sorts of activities, there is no need in many of those fields to be licensed. That you and others here are unaware of that is a reflection of your ignorance and intellectual laziness. Just to pick two examples, in many states, industrial and organizational psychologists do not have to be licensed. If they are not engaged in individual or group practice on the side, professors of psychology typically don't have to be licensed in psychology. How do you do an accredited academic psychology study if you are not licensed? Let's say your dissertation involves surveying attitudes towards X, Y, or Z, and you design the survey, pick the audience, mail the survey to recipients, get the completed surveys back, code the results and analyze them. You typically need academic credentials to have the survey accepted, but you don't have to be licensed. And once again, Fretwell, you have demonstrated why it makes no sense to "debate" you. Your answer regards someone working on a psychology degree, not a psychologist. Exactly. People can parlay a psychology degree into lots of things but a distressing number of them are analyzing people by how they order their Venti Iced Pumpkin Spice Chai Latte at Starbucks. I worked with a guy in the 1980’s who had his degree in psychology. Said he went to,school to figure out why he was so screwed up. He stated, failed that part, but found out he loved statistics. Did our system bench marks. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 20:56:43 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 8:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:35:36 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:23 PM, wrote: On 4 Oct 2018 20:52:05 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:30:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Your statement that psychologists can work without a license really just depends on what state they are in. Once again, your educational limitations exceed your reach. If you are not practicing, you do not need a license. "Work" is a term that opens the door to many rooms, and in the case of psychologists, those rooms do not have to involve working as a therapist. If you are saying they can help design ad campaigns to appeal to a certain demographic, you are right but if they are seeing patients in Florida they need some kind of a license, even if they are just bar tenders or hair dressers. I've posted several times that if you are not seeing patients, you do not need a license. It does call into question how you work being a psychologist if you are not seeing patients. What are you doing? Cleaning the office? Answering the phone? Your raising that question once again demonstrates your ignorance and disdain for academic study. How can you do an accredited academic study as a psychologist if not dealing with patients? Harry just got caught being wrong again and he is trying to tap dance his way out of it ... again. The M.O. is the usual one, insult and diversion. Psychologists have professional employment opportunities that have nothing to do with treating patients and if they are engaged in those sorts of activities, there is no need in many of those fields to be licensed. I acknowledged that, basically just recommending what motivates people. juvenile insult snipped Just to pick two examples, in many states, industrial and organizational psychologists do not have to be licensed. If they are not engaged in individual or group practice on the side, professors of psychology typically don't have to be licensed in psychology. Those that can do, Those that can't teach. I know. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ford's Ex-boyfriend Opens Up
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 20:56:43 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 8:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:35:36 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/4/18 5:23 PM, wrote: On 4 Oct 2018 20:52:05 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:30:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Your statement that psychologists can work without a license really just depends on what state they are in. Once again, your educational limitations exceed your reach. If you are not practicing, you do not need a license. "Work" is a term that opens the door to many rooms, and in the case of psychologists, those rooms do not have to involve working as a therapist. If you are saying they can help design ad campaigns to appeal to a certain demographic, you are right but if they are seeing patients in Florida they need some kind of a license, even if they are just bar tenders or hair dressers. I've posted several times that if you are not seeing patients, you do not need a license. It does call into question how you work being a psychologist if you are not seeing patients. What are you doing? Cleaning the office? Answering the phone? Your raising that question once again demonstrates your ignorance and disdain for academic study. How can you do an accredited academic study as a psychologist if not dealing with patients? Harry just got caught being wrong again and he is trying to tap dance his way out of it ... again. The M.O. is the usual one, insult and diversion. Psychologists have professional employment opportunities that have nothing to do with treating patients and if they are engaged in those sorts of activities, there is no need in many of those fields to be licensed. That you and others here are unaware of that is a reflection of your ignorance and intellectual laziness. Just to pick two examples, in many states, industrial and organizational psychologists do not have to be licensed. If they are not engaged in individual or group practice on the side, professors of psychology typically don't have to be licensed in psychology. How do you do an accredited academic psychology study if you are not licensed? Let's say your dissertation involves surveying attitudes towards X, Y, or Z, and you design the survey, pick the audience, mail the survey to recipients, get the completed surveys back, code the results and analyze them. You typically need academic credentials to have the survey accepted, but you don't have to be licensed. And once again, Fretwell, you have demonstrated why it makes no sense to "debate" you. You're describing a statistician, which, if you'll be honest, is what your non-patient-treating psychologists really are. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| will a ford... | General | |||
| Ford had their act together... | General | |||
| and meanwhile Ford ... | General | |||
| Gaynz after a fight with his boyfriend . . . | ASA | |||
| Martin Baxter & His Boyfriend | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
