Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default Just an observance ....

On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote:


So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist?


I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have
nominated to the Supreme Court.

Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg?
If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you
stand.

It's "Democratic," by the way, not
"Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican
party-ism. Oh, wait.


"Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you
were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from
"democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things.
Machine politics over all else.
......

And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again.



Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you
fellas trust Trump and the Republicans.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Just an observance ....


7:02 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you
fellas trust Trump and the Republicans.

........


What’s funny is that he led Hillary in points and pills and the wouldn’t back him Mand gave everything to her, totally shafting him. And you back that?

Btw, trump isn’t a republican either. Why do you say we back him? Because we didn’t vote for Hillary? Is that it???

I will say this- it doesn’t matter that you don’t like it, He is the President.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Just an observance ....

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote:


So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist?


I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have
nominated to the Supreme Court.

Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg?
If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you
stand.

It's "Democratic," by the way, not
"Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican
party-ism. Oh, wait.


"Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you
were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from
"democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things.
Machine politics over all else.
......

And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again.



Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you
fellas trust Trump and the Republicans.


Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Just an observance ....


On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.

..........

The democrats pulled a totally undemocratic sham.

No more DNC for me
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default Just an observance ....

Tim wrote:

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.

.........

The democrats pulled a totally undemocratic sham.

No more DNC for me


Yeah, you are the perfect Trumpster.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Just an observance ....


12:35 PMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
Tim wrote:

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.

.........

The democrats pulled a totally undemocratic sham.

No more DNC for me


Yeah, you are the perfect Trumpster.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.

............

Whatever
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default Just an observance ....

On 9/24/18 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote:

So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist?


I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have
nominated to the Supreme Court.
Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg?
If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you
stand.

It's "Democratic," by the way, not
"Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican
party-ism. Oh, wait.

"Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you
were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from
"democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things.
Machine politics over all else.
......

And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again.



Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you
fellas trust Trump and the Republicans.


Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.



Bernie is a socialist. He considers himself an independent. He caucuses
with the Dems. He doesn't run as a Dem. The only Libertarians I recall
who ran for and won federal office ran as Republicans.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Just an observance ....

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:47:38 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/24/18 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote:

So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist?


I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have
nominated to the Supreme Court.
Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg?
If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you
stand.

It's "Democratic," by the way, not
"Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican
party-ism. Oh, wait.

"Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you
were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from
"democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things.
Machine politics over all else.
......

And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again.



Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you
fellas trust Trump and the Republicans.


Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.



Bernie is a socialist. He considers himself an independent. He caucuses
with the Dems. He doesn't run as a Dem. The only Libertarians I recall
who ran for and won federal office ran as Republicans.


He ran as a democrat in 2016 and that is what we are talking about.
You are just trying to divert from how undemocratic the process was
that scuttled him.
It probably scuttled the best chance the DNC had to win the white
house too. People who hated Hillary were not ever going to change
their mind. Bernie may have flipped a couple of red states. He was
running against Washington "business as usual" too.
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default Just an observance ....

On 9/24/18 7:31 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:47:38 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/24/18 1:06 PM,
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote:

So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist?


I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have
nominated to the Supreme Court.
Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg?
If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you
stand.

It's "Democratic," by the way, not
"Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican
party-ism. Oh, wait.

"Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you
were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from
"democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things.
Machine politics over all else.
......

And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again.



Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you
fellas trust Trump and the Republicans.

Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.



Bernie is a socialist. He considers himself an independent. He caucuses
with the Dems. He doesn't run as a Dem. The only Libertarians I recall
who ran for and won federal office ran as Republicans.


He ran as a democrat in 2016 and that is what we are talking about.
You are just trying to divert from how undemocratic the process was
that scuttled him.
It probably scuttled the best chance the DNC had to win the white
house too. People who hated Hillary were not ever going to change
their mind. Bernie may have flipped a couple of red states. He was
running against Washington "business as usual" too.



I never thought Bernie could win a general election. Never. Still don't.
He said he was a Dem for purpose of the primaries, but he "reverted"
back to what he really was afterwards.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Just an observance ....

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:36:41 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/24/18 7:31 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:47:38 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/24/18 1:06 PM,
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote:

So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist?


I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have
nominated to the Supreme Court.
Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg?
If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you
stand.

It's "Democratic," by the way, not
"Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican
party-ism. Oh, wait.

"Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you
were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from
"democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things.
Machine politics over all else.
......

And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again.



Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you
fellas trust Trump and the Republicans.

Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.



Bernie is a socialist. He considers himself an independent. He caucuses
with the Dems. He doesn't run as a Dem. The only Libertarians I recall
who ran for and won federal office ran as Republicans.


He ran as a democrat in 2016 and that is what we are talking about.
You are just trying to divert from how undemocratic the process was
that scuttled him.
It probably scuttled the best chance the DNC had to win the white
house too. People who hated Hillary were not ever going to change
their mind. Bernie may have flipped a couple of red states. He was
running against Washington "business as usual" too.



I never thought Bernie could win a general election. Never. Still don't.
He said he was a Dem for purpose of the primaries, but he "reverted"
back to what he really was afterwards.


See now you can't say that about my guy Gary. He is seeking a seat in
the senate as we speak as a Libertarian.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/407916-a-senator-gary-johnson-could-be-good-not-just-for-libertarians-but-for-the
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017