| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Just an observance ....
On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote: So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist? I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have nominated to the Supreme Court. Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg? If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you stand. It's "Democratic," by the way, not "Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican party-ism. Oh, wait. "Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from "democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things. Machine politics over all else. ...... And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again. Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you fellas trust Trump and the Republicans. |
Just an observance ....
7:02 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you fellas trust Trump and the Republicans. ........ What’s funny is that he led Hillary in points and pills and the wouldn’t back him Mand gave everything to her, totally shafting him. And you back that? Btw, trump isn’t a republican either. Why do you say we back him? Because we didn’t vote for Hillary? Is that it??? I will say this- it doesn’t matter that you don’t like it, He is the President. |
Just an observance ....
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote: So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist? I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have nominated to the Supreme Court. Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg? If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you stand. It's "Democratic," by the way, not "Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican party-ism. Oh, wait. "Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from "democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things. Machine politics over all else. ...... And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again. Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you fellas trust Trump and the Republicans. Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door. |
Just an observance ....
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze - show quoted text - Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door. .......... The democrats pulled a totally undemocratic sham. No more DNC for me |
Just an observance ....
Tim wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze - show quoted text - Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door. ......... The democrats pulled a totally undemocratic sham. No more DNC for me Yeah, you are the perfect Trumpster. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Just an observance ....
12:35 PMKeyser Söze - hide quoted text - Tim wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze - show quoted text - Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door. ......... The democrats pulled a totally undemocratic sham. No more DNC for me Yeah, you are the perfect Trumpster. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. ............ Whatever |
Just an observance ....
|
Just an observance ....
On 9/24/18 7:31 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:47:38 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/24/18 1:06 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote: So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist? I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have nominated to the Supreme Court. Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg? If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you stand. It's "Democratic," by the way, not "Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican party-ism. Oh, wait. "Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from "democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things. Machine politics over all else. ...... And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again. Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you fellas trust Trump and the Republicans. Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door. Bernie is a socialist. He considers himself an independent. He caucuses with the Dems. He doesn't run as a Dem. The only Libertarians I recall who ran for and won federal office ran as Republicans. He ran as a democrat in 2016 and that is what we are talking about. You are just trying to divert from how undemocratic the process was that scuttled him. It probably scuttled the best chance the DNC had to win the white house too. People who hated Hillary were not ever going to change their mind. Bernie may have flipped a couple of red states. He was running against Washington "business as usual" too. I never thought Bernie could win a general election. Never. Still don't. He said he was a Dem for purpose of the primaries, but he "reverted" back to what he really was afterwards. |
Just an observance ....
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:36:41 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 9/24/18 7:31 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:47:38 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/24/18 1:06 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote: So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist? I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have nominated to the Supreme Court. Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg? If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you stand. It's "Democratic," by the way, not "Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican party-ism. Oh, wait. "Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from "democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things. Machine politics over all else. ...... And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again. Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you fellas trust Trump and the Republicans. Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door. Bernie is a socialist. He considers himself an independent. He caucuses with the Dems. He doesn't run as a Dem. The only Libertarians I recall who ran for and won federal office ran as Republicans. He ran as a democrat in 2016 and that is what we are talking about. You are just trying to divert from how undemocratic the process was that scuttled him. It probably scuttled the best chance the DNC had to win the white house too. People who hated Hillary were not ever going to change their mind. Bernie may have flipped a couple of red states. He was running against Washington "business as usual" too. I never thought Bernie could win a general election. Never. Still don't. He said he was a Dem for purpose of the primaries, but he "reverted" back to what he really was afterwards. See now you can't say that about my guy Gary. He is seeking a seat in the senate as we speak as a Libertarian. https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/407916-a-senator-gary-johnson-could-be-good-not-just-for-libertarians-but-for-the |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com