On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:02:47 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:19:52 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/18 8:17 PM, Bill wrote:

So it is okay when a Democrat President appoints an ultra liberal leftist?


I'm not aware of any "ultra liberal leftists" Democratic presidents have
nominated to the Supreme Court.
Kagan? Sotomayor? Ginsburg?
If you don't think they are leftists, it is only because of where you
stand.

It's "Democratic," by the way, not
"Democrat." The way you use that word is just an ignorant Republican
party-ism. Oh, wait.

"Democratic" infers that they do things in a democratic way. If you
were watching how they ****ed Bernie, the process was far from
"democratic" but it was certainly the "democrat" way of doing things.
Machine politics over all else.
......

And believe me, there were many of us that watched it very closely and will never trust the DNC again.



Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. What's funny, of course, is that you
fellas trust Trump and the Republicans.

Bernie was a democrat in the sense that you call all Libertarians
republicans and he was running for the democrat nomination at a very
undemocratic convention. When you have enough "machine" super
delegates to advance a nominee in spite of the vote, it is not
democratic, no matter what it says on the signs over the door.