Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Spam Me Please" wrote in message news:OY9pb.85137$HS4.692587@attbi_s01... Gould, The fact that you keep repeating the same statements does not make it correct. JD Powers has a listing of boats broken down by category at the following web site: http://www.jdpower.com/cc/boats/boatratings.jsp JD Powers has something to sell without resorting to biasing the survey, that is what you fail to realize. Companies are very interested in the consumers perception of them, both good and bad, the number 1 label is the same as Consumer Reports "Best Value" and while there are people who would disagree with CR ratings, I have never heard anyone say there reports are deliberately biased. The following is a post from JD Powers about how their surveys work. This was from May 02 from the Trailer Boats Magazine web site. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Hello boaters. I am the director of the J. D. Power and Associates Marine Study, and I'd be happy to discuss how our program works with anyone who's interested. There was quite a string of emails in March regarding Bryant's subscribing to the study. I'll address a few of the misconceptions about J.D. Power, and I look forward to hearing from anyone and everyone about what we're up to. We are surveying some 50,000 owners of boats in six segments this year, with our 2002 report due out in August. Bass boats, Coastal Fishing (17-28 feet), Runabouts (16-19 and 20-29 feet), Pontoons, Ski/Wakeboard and Coastal Cruisers (24-33 feet) are being covered this year, and an engine report will also be produced covering outboards, sterndrives and inboards by brand and model. Manufacturers are included in the study based on how many owners we can mail out to. We like to have 150 returns per brand per segment for statistical validity, so with a 28% response rate, we generally look for manufacturers who produce 450 or more boats per year. We will include smaller builders under certain circumstances. This year we have 70 boat brands represented, so we're covering the great majority of the units sold in each of these six segments. So whether Bryant or anyone else buys, or subscribes to, our study, if they' re big enough to qualify, we still survey their owners. That's what gives our study so much value to our subscribers, in fact; all that competitive data is used by builders to improve their own product and service. What we report is not our own analysis or opinion, but the voice of the consumer. The art here is knowing what questions to ask to elicit information that is actionable for the boatbuilder. Companies buy our reports because they contain useful data. Boatbuilders can use the info to see where their own product comes up short and needs fixing, what not to fix (since is isn't broken), and precisely where and how the competition is doing a better job. Incidentally, a builder like Bryant can buy a copy of our syndicated report for a little more than half of the $35,000 mentioned, if they take advantage of various discounts available. Whether you are a newcomer to boating or an old salt, you may well have no clue about how well a manufacturer's dealer sales and service network takes care of its owners. You can own a great boat, with superb construction, a wonderful hull form and smooth-as-silk propulsion, but if the warranty service or parts availability is lacking, you won't enjoy the experience of owning the boat as much as you should. These reports tell us who's who in the industry, and they're based entirely on survey results from owners like you. At www.jdpower.com, you can see the Power Circle rankings of the three boat segments we surveyed last year. These website rankings are high-level; the detailed, actionable info is reserved for the manufacturers who pay to put it to work for them. These rankings are based solely on customer input, and have nothing to do with who did or didn't buy the reports from us. Those manufacturers who win in each segment also have the option of paying for the use of the J.D. Power name in their advertising. When you see a Cobalt, Grady White or Ranger (or Lexus) ad with the J.D. Power name and trophy, they purchased the right to use it. We hope and expect that the public spotlight provided by J.D. Power's entry into the marine industry results in improved levels of quality and customer satisfaction across the board. That's certainly been the case in automotive and other industries, and we look forward to it happening in marine as well. Thanks, and I look forward to hearing from you. -------------------- Eric Sorensen Director, Marine Practice J.D. Power and Associates ------------------------------------------------------------------- posted May 15, 2002 01:17 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to all of you for your interest in the J.D. Power and Associates marine study. I'll answer a few of your questions, in the general order in which they appear in the string. 1.) We take a similar "snapshot", sample-size-wise, of all the boatbuilders in a segment. That means we survey (send out questionnaires to) about the same number of owners per brand per segment. For instance, we don' t send surveys to 3,000 Bayliner owners and 300 Cobalt owners; once you get to a certain number of returns, adding sample size is going to have little if any impact on the overall results. We make sure we're at that baseline level before we include a brand in any of our syndicated studies. 2.) We find that the very happy and very upset owners, as well as those in the middle of the road, tend to balance each other out, producing consistent results among the brands. 3.) The questions are designed to be as neutral as possible, so we don 't "lead the witness", or try to produce one result rather than another. 4.) We've found that there was surprisingly little difference, statistically, between the responses of owners who'd owned their boats for shorter or longer periods of time. 5.) We are careful to prevent any "gaming" (for instance, a manufacturer withholding the names of dissatisfied customers would be gaming) in the study. As an auditing step, we either get or verify all of our boat owners' names from an independent, 3rd-party source which has access to HIN data on nearly all boats sold in the country. If we can't verify the validity of name source, it isn't included in the study. 6.) There is really no merit to the notion that larger builders somehow score better. See the 2001 public rankings at www.jdpower.com for the evidence. 7.) Regarding perception, which is part of what we measure and report on, the customers' collective perception is the boatbuilder's (and engine manufacturer's) reality. -------------------- Eric Sorensen Director, Marine Practice J.D. Power and Associates |