This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.

On 6/27/18 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.




Well, of course, it's an anti-worker, right-wing court. No surprise.

On 6/27/2018 10:39 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/27/18 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.




Well, of course, it's an anti-worker, right-wing court. No surprise.


Apparently this decision reverses a Supreme Court ruling back in 1977.
Several unsuccessful attempts to change or modify that ruling since
have been made over the years.

Ah, yes. Making America Great Again.

Ain't you proud?

On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:39:06 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 6/27/18 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.




Well, of course, it's an anti-worker, right-wing court. No surprise.

Public worker unions are anti citizen because they get to "negotiate"
from both sides of the table.
When they get to influence the politicians that are supposed to
represent the tax payer you end up with the abusive contracts that are
bankrupting our municipalities.
The idea that they can force people to join an organization they may
not agree with is also anti American.
I bet you would scream your head off if they charged a tax on your
guns and ammo that went straight to the NRA. It is certainly as easy
to make the argument that you are getting the benefit that the unions
use.
The next step is to remove all tax payer funding of these unions. It
is stupid that union workers are on the government payroll while they
are doing the work of the union, against the interests of the tax
payer.

"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:

This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.





It keeps on getting better.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 6/27/2018 10:39 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/27/18 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.




Well, of course, it's an anti-worker, right-wing court. No surprise.


Apparently this decision reverses a Supreme Court ruling back in 1977.
Several unsuccessful attempts to change or modify that ruling since
have been made over the years.

Ah, yes. Making America Great Again.

Ain't you proud?




Two in a row must have Fat Harry's head exploding.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 6/27/18 12:55 PM, justan wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 6/27/2018 10:39 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/27/18 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.




Well, of course, it's an anti-worker, right-wing court. No surprise.


Apparently this decision reverses a Supreme Court ruling back in 1977.
Several unsuccessful attempts to change or modify that ruling since
have been made over the years.

Ah, yes. Making America Great Again.

Ain't you proud?




Two in a row must have Fat Harry's head exploding.


Not at all. It is exactly what one would expect with right-wing
ideologues running the judiciary. I would expect more being taken away
from low and middle income Amerikkkans and handed to the rich.

On 6/27/2018 12:55 PM, justan wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 6/27/2018 10:39 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/27/18 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.




Well, of course, it's an anti-worker, right-wing court. No surprise.


Apparently this decision reverses a Supreme Court ruling back in 1977.
Several unsuccessful attempts to change or modify that ruling since
have been made over the years.

Ah, yes. Making America Great Again.

Ain't you proud?




Two in a row must have Fat Harry's head exploding.



Another "classy" Democrat - Keith Ellison

"Gorsuch really should not be on the Supreme Court," he said. "He may be
there, but he's not there properly. You know, you can do that. You can
jam in a Supreme Court by denying a sitting president their right to
appoint the Supreme Court justice. That is exactly what happened, and
Gorsuch has just done what his paymasters sent him there to do. It's a
shame."

Ellison, who is deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee, is
running for Minnesota Attorney General. He has been forced to defend
himself against critics of his past meetings with Nation of Islam leader
Louis Farrakhan, who is known for his outlandish conspiracy theories and
anti-Semitism.

On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:35:39 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.


And well done!

On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 13:03:35 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 6/27/18 12:55 PM, justan wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 6/27/2018 10:39 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/27/18 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

This time delivering a blow to public unions.

Public employee unions can no longer require non-union workers to pay
union dues to help defray the costs of collective bargaining.

This decision also eliminates the practice of unions supporting
politicians using funds collected by non-union public employees
who may not support said politicians.




Well, of course, it's an anti-worker, right-wing court. No surprise.


Apparently this decision reverses a Supreme Court ruling back in 1977.
Several unsuccessful attempts to change or modify that ruling since
have been made over the years.

Ah, yes. Making America Great Again.

Ain't you proud?




Two in a row must have Fat Harry's head exploding.


Not at all. It is exactly what one would expect with right-wing
ideologues running the judiciary. I would expect more being taken away
from low and middle income Amerikkkans and handed to the rich.

Who do you think pays for all of those union demands?
It is the local city tax payer. (low and middle income Americans)
In many cases it is tax payers up north in crumbling cities sending 6
figure retirement benefits to people in sunbelt states.
Thanks.

BTW nice touch alleging all low and middle income Americans are in the
KKK. Keep up all of this "deplorable" bull**** and we will have 6 more
years of Trump. Ivanka might run in 2024 under the "feckless ****s of
the world unite" banner.